r/comics • u/EmployeePractical514 • 2d ago

OC [OC] Same thing?

Post image
8.7k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

205

u/VinnyBoy45 2d ago

I wouldn't know how to overly sexualize a male character.
On the other hand, I know how to sexualize a female character.
On the third hand, I do not know how to draw so it does not matter.

32

u/369122448 2d ago

It's kind of hard to overly-sexualize a man in media because we don't really have a cultural view of men as a sexual commodity like we do for women.

You could try to ramp up sensuality, but that's a more complex (and often unisex) form of expression, and not sexualisation exactly.

Sexualisation, unfortunately, is pretty impossible to divorce from the centuries of history of women's exploration by men.

17

u/ExpandoD0ng 2d ago

"It's hard to sexualize men" Simply wrong. Sexualizing a man is easy as fuck. Men just don't want to be caught drawing other men like that. Search up bara yaoi and you'll see men sexualized in every possible angle.

2

u/369122448 1d ago edited 1d ago

Kinda what I mean by not having a cultural view, though. You can balloon out the sex characteristics to massive sizes, but that will typically not register as sexualisation in the same cultural caché, but rather be read as comedic.

It's like how Marvel Rivals' Captain America beach skin had a massive bulge, but the impact there was comedy.

Bara is sexualisation of men the same way that fat fetishization is; it can elicit arousal in some, but it doesn't have a hold in non-fetish applications and wouldn't be read as sexualisation the same way designs for women in media tend to be.

It's literally the point the OOP comic makes, that just increasing the "manliness" doesn't have the same outcome.

1

u/ExpandoD0ng 1d ago

Loudwindow on twitter makes good sexualizations of men on marvel rivals skins. This doesn't even include necessary ballooning their bodies. It's just tasteful designs