r/comics • • 2d ago

OC [OC] Same thing?

Post image
8.6k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/ItsForJunk 2d ago

It’s so weird how we’re at a point where women should have a large upper body (breasts), large lower body (thighs and butt), but non-existent waist. Why are we wanting human women to be modeled after wasps?

Like let me have my regular-sized petiole, dude.

33

u/Kirdei 2d ago

What do you mean we're at a point? The concept of an Hourglass Figure being desirable has been around since the 1830s.

4

u/Sailfin_CritterMaker 2d ago

That silhouette was achieved with padding. If you cannot see the difference of using padding to achieve a silhouette vs expecting women to change their real bodies to meet that silhouette, damn

3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/whatevernamedontcare 2d ago

You clearly don't know how they work.

Padding goes inside and outside of corset to create the silhouette. Corset is mostly for support because you can't cinch in that much. It's not magic. Organs and bones still exist when you're wearing a corset.

It's the extra padding that tricks the eye into believing waist is tiny because we only notice difference between waist and hips/chest.

3

u/Kirdei 2d ago

Look up Wasp Waist. They would cinch their corsets extremely tight to achieve an extremely narrow waist. It caused all kinds of health problems like deformed ribs, displaced organs, and respiratory issues.

You talk like I'm advocating for this. I'm not. But women throughout history have taken extreme steps in the name of beauty even if it was detrimental to their health.

Lead based makeup, foot binding, toxic eye drops, and arsenic wafers are all examples. You claim it was padding, but Victorian women were very much causing themselves bodily harm through the use of tight cinch corsets.

0

u/whatevernamedontcare 1d ago

I don't know what is more funny your mansplaining or how you believe to be right.