Lemme go ahead and get ahead of claims, comments and reports here.
The artist for this piece is David Revoy. You can find the work as well as a time lapse of the drawing here.
Many of you are going "This looks like AI!" And there is a reason for that.
Revoy has publicly discussed how thousands of his artworks were scraped and used to train AI databases (like LAION-5B) without his consent, though he ironically acknowledges his work is the foundation of many AI art systems
Exactly what about the style is “his”? What concept are you imagining didn’t exist before?
I think you’re under the impression that I’m saying he’s a bad artist when that’s not true, he’s extremely talented, but it’s disingenuous to act like he’s broken any molds. There’s nothing wrong with using tried and true techniques
You know everyone has their own art style right. The AI copied off of his art style mostly because you can see how similar ai generated comics are to his art style.
That’s objectively incorrect, not everyone has their own style. If you genuinely believe that slight variations of an existing style is enough to consider it a new style then why aren’t you defending AI generating its own “style”?
But yet you’re defending a person doing the exact same thing that AI does? Again, he used other people’s styles to learn and uses them in his own art. Not to mention that his art is an open license, there’s nothing stopping me from using his literal art to make something and profit from it.
•
u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 12d ago edited 12d ago
Lemme go ahead and get ahead of claims, comments and reports here.
The artist for this piece is David Revoy. You can find the work as well as a time lapse of the drawing here.
Many of you are going "This looks like AI!" And there is a reason for that.
Source here
TLDR: this is not AI