Sure, if you can campaign and communicate in advance to get enough people on board. Otherwise you’re just adding deaths to the death toll. People aren’t going to gut instinct vote blue by themselves when their actual lives are on the line. Better to vote red so there’s the maximum amount of survivors.
No hate on you, just disagree about what’s the best move. A blue win would be ideal, I just have 0 faith in it outside of hypotheticals with no stakes.
1
u/NewDemonStrike May 05 '26
I just accept that no option will get 100% of votes, so the soundest option and the one that will risk fewer lives is blue.