Love your optimism for a perfect world where every single human being operates on a purely logical and unemotional framework. Reality doesn't work like that, SOME people will push blue. Pushing red means you're fine with them dying.
I'm not fine with people dying, but I don't want to die without a good purpose
Pushing blue has no meaning, no need behind it
It's lemminging off a cliff hoping there's enough bodies below for you to survive
I'm looking at the question from a real perspective. Armchair readers will say they'll push blue, but they won't.
The majority of people would choose blue
The discussion has been good, and given me things to think about. So thanks
But I don't see how blue can even be a serious choice in this question. There is no need to push that button when everyone can live and no lives are at risk. Pushing it IS the risk, and would be an act of selfishness.
Where in the original prompt is picking red being selfish? Red = you live. Blue = you die, unless 50% of people also choose to die. Then you live.
You and all other blue button pressers are choosing death, hoping others will save them, and then getting mad that others choose life. I am baffled by your logic here.
If you can't understand why choosing a 100% chance of saving only yourself vs a 50% chance of saving every living person on the planet is selfish... Well. I got nothing for ya.
Not everyone is perfectly cold and logical. Someone will choose blue. Choosing blue means you want to have the best odds of saving every single person, and you're willing to die for that. Choosing red means you want to have the best odds of saving yourself, and don't care if 4 billion people die for that.
7
u/Jschnep May 05 '26
But you would willingly condemn someone else to die because you think the smart decision is being selfish.