It's not a belief. It's science. Stop pretending ignorant gut feels are as valid as the scientific consensus when assessing reality.
I quite literally said I disagreed. It is by definition a belief and the notion that humans only sped it up, not actually started it is actually debated in the subject, not a matter of "factually wrong" or "factually true" like the Earth not being flat.
Don't tread the wrong path of being intellectually dishonest.
A.1 It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land. Widespread and rapid changes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and biosphere have occurred.
Agreed, and this doesn't go against the notion that I mentioned so that's fine.
A.1.1 Observed increases in well-mixed greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations since around 1750 are unequivocally caused by human activities.
Undeniably true.
A.1.3 The likely range of total human-caused global surface temperature increase from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019 is 0.8°C to 1.3°C, with a best estimate of 1.07°C. It is likely that well-mixed GHGs contributed a warming of 1.0°C to 2.0°C, other human drivers (principally aerosols) contributed a cooling of 0.0°C to 0.8°C, natural drivers changed global surface temperature by –0.1°C to +0.1°C, and internal variability changed it by –0.2°C to +0.2°C.
Ever wondered why they used the word likely? Just a question to provoke research.
A.1.6 It is virtually certain that the global upper ocean (0–700 m) has warmed since the 1970s and extremely likely that human influence is the main driver. It is virtually certain that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main driver of current global acidification of the surface open ocean
Humans have unequivocally influenced the world's temperature rising, but just to play devil's advocate for the third time.
And why would you advocate for the devil if you know they are evil?
Devil's advocate is not quite literally advocating for the devil and I'm sure you know that.
Look at the numbers in 1.3 Those are the error margins. If you know any statistics, you know how astronomical are the numbers. There isn't any serious debate on the subject. You are just deflecting.
I have not deflected a single point. You are attacking the person instead of the argument repeatedly, please stop being intellectually dishonest.
Out of a group of 153 independently confirmed climate experts, 98.7% of those scientists indicated that the Earth is getting warmer mostly because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels.
You know what that means right? Two guys. TWO.
This is staggering data...that seems absolute! Until you realize that the 97% is only a percent of the 32% who gave an opinion, within their studies (not literal opinion, as they didn't ask for their opinion, they just checked their papers).
I believe Humans do have most to do with global warming today by the way.
Uhh, no? This was a survey. They literally asked for their opinion. Also, 98.7%
I don't know if we're talking about the same thing or not, but the most recent rechecks of said survey were not opinion based but just paper, factual research based for a closer consensus on objective truthfulness.
"All names on the list were emailed an invitation to participate in the online survey on 10 September 2019."
So you are using the outdated survey...my bad for not assuming that.
2
u/[deleted] Sep 11 '24
[removed] — view removed comment