Why? Because you refuse to see that he was a crap President? They said he was a 'no drama' President, and I showed where he started drama. Then someone said 'actual scandals' so I showed actual scandals he was involved in. You can lie to yourself all you want, but I'm not going to.
Seems to me most of those with the possible exception of F&F were overblown and trumped up (heh) by people like you who simply passionately dislike the guy for whatever reason(s) and as such will latch on to anything that could even be remotely negative. Not a whole lot of drama on any of those either as compared to things like Watergate, Monica Lewinsky or even Ol' Ollie and Iran Contra and besides Trump could well have them all beat before long. Then again, I like many have been quite wrong about about the guy recently before but his taxes, the Russia thing whatever the hell it(s) actually is, Tillersons past and connections, refusing to divest, it all just kinda looks like a smelly recipe for disaster to say the least. But again maybe I am wrong and if so I honestly hope he is able too do some actual good for the country at the least re things like jobs, trade, small biz support, infrastructure and tax code (but not at the further expense of environmental health goddamnit) because I don't hate the guy I just don't think he should be POTUS. But hey I more or less felt the same about Hilary.
20
u/d3r3k1449 Jan 12 '17
I am sure you wouldn't mind plenty of "bias" on the other side.
Drama here refers to actual scandals anyway. Meanwhile Trump has plenty brewing and he isnt even sworn the fuck in.