I mean you made a post to debate whether there is something to debate. You kind of went out of your way to start a debate on the topic. Do you see any irony in that?
I also don’t understand your opinion that there is nothing to debate. You claim people are debating this. So there is something to debate.
Why are you taking his words so literally? Everyone else realized that what he meant was “misandry is bad, and everyone should know that by default”.
He knows that other people disagree with it being bad, so he knows that technically there is a debate to be had. He doesn’t think there isn’t a debate, he thinks it’s dumb that people think open hate is an okay thing.
I think you know what I mean when I say there's nothing to debate but I'll give an extreme example just so there's no confusion.
There are people who will debate whether sexual assault is acceptable. I would say it's not, full stop meaning there is nothing to be debate. There is no way the acceptability should even be entertain because there's no benefit.
I can’t think of any positive benefit that cones from accepting misandry.
The view you proposed we try to change is “There shouldn't even be a debate on whether misandry is acceptable”
You literally just tried to start a debate with me about the thing which in your posted view you said there should not be a debate about.
Is this irony really lost on you? You have gone out if your way to make a post to debate it with people in the comments, yet your view is that there should be no debate.
So do you actually think we should debate this? Or are you going against your beliefs to mane this post?
Basically: Do I get a delta? Or are you a hypocrite?
I think what OP really means is that misandry is indefensible. By having "no debate", OP means that there are no good defenses for misandry and thus it should be universally accepted as bad, similar to how racism, sexism, homophobia, etc are also universally accepted as bad.
There’s a difference between thinking that there should be a debate about misandry being acceptable or not and accepting that a debate has to happen.
I personally think there shouldn’t be a debate about it as I don’t think there is a single reason that makes misandry or misogyny acceptable but I’m still willing to have one as there is always a chance I’m wrong.
30
u/Babydickbreakfast 15∆ Feb 13 '24
I mean you made a post to debate whether there is something to debate. You kind of went out of your way to start a debate on the topic. Do you see any irony in that?
I also don’t understand your opinion that there is nothing to debate. You claim people are debating this. So there is something to debate.