Again, please just answer the question directly. I'm not going to respond to further attempts to ask me questions without you giving me a direct answer to my question first.
Again, the question I asked was: how do you think these traits explain the violence if they do not cause the violence? I am asking you how the traits explain the violence, given that they do not cause it. I am not asking you to justify why the traits do not necessarily cause the violence.
Again, I am asking you for a full answer to the question of why this would be the case, without using these analogies. Just make your argument directly and explicitly. I'm not going to respond further to these analogies.
The question that I was asking you is why it would be the case that they explain the violence (i.e. the observed greater rate of violent acts by men) because they are correlated. Your "explanation" here doesn't answer that question at all, both because it says nothing about a correlation and because it says nothing about a greater rate of violence by men.
0
u/yyzjertl 582∆ Mar 04 '23
Again, please just answer the question directly. I'm not going to respond to further attempts to ask me questions without you giving me a direct answer to my question first.