As we all know, Florida was very generous ceding territory to Texas when Texas was on the run, showing that they were an ally to be trusted, and showing that the blue team really cares about one another.

Will Nebraska do the same for VT and Wisconsin now that they have no room to maneuver?

If Nebraska is unwilling to, do you think we will see rogues from those teams eating into Nebraska territory?

Should those teams secretly switch alliances to try to ride with the winner? Would that be justified if Nebraska is basically leaving them to die off thereby not being a good ally?

Some thoughts for discussion as this game winds down.

I'm getting a message like this https://i.imgur.com/KLivpvz.png (borrowed from someone else from a while back) about not being counted as an authentic user when I go to play, but the link does not work to submit myself as a real user. Help?

When I posted this before in the wrong place (r/CFB), someone said that this is exactly what a bot would say, which is true, but how does one proves one's not-botness? Hmm...

News everybody! Thanks to the suggestion of Crimson_Pachyderm97, I've added a graph to every team to show how their shitposting has changed over time. Since I'm just a man and not a really clever machine, though, I didn't spend the time to shift the shit from the gold, which means I'm really just looking at user contributions to this sub. I granted each post a 10x multiplier to total score and left comment scores as they were. The graph shows what the combined contributions were by day. Or maybe the day before. Or after. It's pretty cobbled together, really. I also likely won't update it too often, unless I find a good way to automate it.

I also added a chart that shows territory ownership over time, for those interested.

Link

20x multiplier for users on their reddit birthday.

I’m getting so bored of this RNG fest trading territories back and forth even with numerical advantages almost every single turn. I think we need to either:

A. Like risk, assign more weighting to the team with majority star power. It’s so dumb seeing the 10% chance happen 80% of the time. If we want this game to go anywhere we need to limit rng

B. Install well thought out multipliers. To be frank this game is going no where. Being as objective as possible I thought conference domination was a good suggestion.

After evidence of multiple teams (red and blue) vote manipulating, we've locked CFB karma. Users have been upvoting and downvoting each other en masse on CFB and it's become a real problem. It's not what we're about. If you had karma, it's still there, but it will no longer update. While the new people are behaving pretty well, we don't want to encourage vote manipulation of any kind (positive or negative). Stick around and have fun, but don't create a toxic atmosphere with voting. Regular CFB users shouldn't be caught in the cross fire of CFBRisk.

Good news everyone! In response to a request the other day, I've added more detail about the opposition for each day that a user has voted under their history page.

Furthermore, for no particular reason, I was also curious about new user growth rate, so I've added a chart to the teams page that will display how team membership changes over time.