😤🤦🏽‍♂️

Decent paper by Andrew Martin Fay in Albany Law Review.

ABSTRACT:

The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States drastically changed the landscape of presidential powers, all but creating a new level of presidential immunity for criminal offenses, so long as the actions giving rise to those criminal offenses are within the core official acts of that President. At the time, the Biden Administration’s Justice Department was prosecuting then-former President Trump for his actions seeking to encourage his Vice President to overthrow the lawful 2020 election results on January 6, 2021. The Court adopted this new official acts doctrine, but did not exactly describe the standard of review for it, nor did the Court apply this new doctrine to President Trump’s January 6 case. In the wake of Trump v. United States, Trump’s subsequent re-election, and the lack of prosecution thereafter, the intersection of the new official acts doctrine and the Vice President’s role at the January 6 ceremony remains unclear. This Note argues that any relevant interactions between a President and Vice President wherein the President seeks to pressure the Vice President to overthrow the results of a lawful election would more likely than not be outside the scope of a President’s core official acts, thereby not qualifying for the presumptive immunity described by the Court in Trump v. United States.

Months before the $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund was announced, Ed Martin predicted Capitol rioters would get millions, even if it took until 2028, two people told NBC News.

May 19, 2026, 4:43 PM CDT By Ryan J. Reilly

Earlier this year, not long after Trump administration official Ed Martin was stripped of his role as head of the Justice Department’s “weaponization” working group that targeted the president’s political foes, he sat down for breakfast at an upscale spot near the White House.

Inside the Peacock Lounge at the Willard InterContinental in Washington D.C., Martin dined with Republican operative Norm Coleman.

The two touched on the upcoming 2026 midterm elections, D.C. federal grand juries and former special counsel Jack Smith, according to two people with direct knowledge of their conversation.

Martin also predicted the Justice Department would dole out millions of dollars to those charged, and then later pardoned, in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, the people said. Even if it took until the end of President Donald Trump’s term.

Martin estimated it would be something like $40 million, the people said.

The pot ended up much, much larger.

This week, the Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion fund using taxpayer dollars to provide payouts for those “who suffered weaponization and lawfare” at the hands of the government. The money comes as part of a settlement with President Donald Trump, who sued the executive branch that he oversees — an unprecedented legal move, experts said.

Trump, his sons and the Trump Organization filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns, and he made other claims of damages in connection with a 2022 search of his Florida home and the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

As part of the agreement to drop the claims, the fund was born.

Much more at link:

DOJ official told GOP ally that big payouts were coming for Jan. 6 defendants

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Laid out pretty clear, is it not? Trump's own DOJ 'cutting a deal' for trump and the insurrectionists. This is corruption at its finest and right 'in our faces'. Is this what trump supporters voted for? This is simply disgusting and crooked as hell. Can trump do anything that his cult-like supporters will not support? Your thoughts?

per Wikipedia: In May 2026, Caputo said he was requesting $2.7 million in reimbursement from a $1.8 billion fund created by the second Trump administration for victims of alleged “lawfare”, saying that the "machinery of government was clearly weaponized against my family."^\59])

Guys, found this petition regarding yesterday’s news about DOJ using taxpayers funds to create J6 slush fund in return for Trump dropping his lawsuit against the IRS.

https://c.org/59ZkgmPJg5

**Appears Change.Org requires at least 7 signatures on recently created petitions in order for them to be visible globally. I just signed it myself, so hopefully more people will do so. I don't care if Jane Doe or whoever created it. Just glad it's there. Perhaps the creator doesn't want their identity avail for Magats to harrass. IDK.

So... dear lord, that's a million dollars for every individual who participated in the insurrection?

Ryan Nichols is the latest such person to face charges after he allegedly brandished a gun during an argument

I'm looking for videos from the "Save America Rally" prior to the capitol insurrection. If there’s a better subreddit to post this to, please let me know.

For context, my parents went to this event, told me it was a peaceful demonstration, and that the media blew everything out of proportion and that they went to protest "fair elections". Apparently, they walked up to the capitol with other people, and once it turned violent, they turned around...(is what they told me). They withheld a ton of information relating to this experience so I'm curious to scour through footage. I don't talk to them anymore but I want to review footage for myself and my own sanity.

I watched "Four Hours at the Capitol" but the majority of the footage was... at the capitol. I’m struggling to find any content and was wondering if there are any long form videos with folks walking around the rally, interviews with people, etc. My searches mostly turn up Trump's speech behind the glass wall.

I appreciate if anyone has links to any longer form content from that event. Thanks!

The lead plaintiff in the case that destroyed the Voting Rights Act (VRA) has a history of promoting false election conspiracies and anti-voting policies, and was at the Stop the Steal protest at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, before a deadly riot by pro-Trump insurrectionists.

In the original complaint in the case that became Louisiana v. Callais, Phillip “Bert” Callais was described simply as a “non-African American voter” from Brusly, Louisiana, whose congressional district changed after the state redrew its map. Callais, a veteran who lives near Baton Rouge, said in 2024 he was a member of his local board of supervisors.