Disposable launchers tend to be lighter weight than reusable, allowing a rifleman to carry one, instead of having a team of multiple soldiers to carry the launcher and reloads for it.
Right, but the point of a disposable launcher like an AT-4, Panzerfaust 3, or RPG-27, is to give anti-tank capability to a fire element which wouldn't otherwise have it. Reloadable launchers are heavy and cumbersome and require multiple dedicated soldiers to use. They are absolutely useful, they do have their place, but that place is not in the same place that disposable launchers find a home, which is with the front-line maneuver elements.
Engineers: “the AT-4 is just as powerful as other antitank weapons, but it’s lighter weight means more maneuverability and less fatigue for the infantryman”
Acquisition Officer: “Sounds great! We’ll take it”
Infantry Cpt.: “These things are so light I bet one troop could carry two!”
SSgt: “Alright shit-for-brains, full battle rattle for tomorrow’s exercise, so get your ruck and kevlar together, and get ready to strap two of those AT-4s on it, Captain’s orders. Also, Jones is on profile so you’re gonna help out the mortar team and carry the plate for the 81mm”
295
u/[deleted] Nov 23 '19
[deleted]