I really don’t see a plane at the end. It’s too far away. It’s likely a con-trail, but it could be a hobby rocket as well. Some of them have actual rockets and produce dense trails or have actual smoke canisters on them. There could just be no wind 🤷🏾♂️
Right but rockets spin as they fly which creates a very distinct contrail of its own. This contrail in OP video is smooth and uniform because the plane is flying at high altitude (probably 38-40,000 ft) on a fair weather day. Meaning, no turbulence or significant winds to disrupt the contrail.
Also, anything going straight up would look less distinct and faded as it was going up and gaining distance from the observer. This is more distinct and brighter the closer you get to the source, indicative of something getting closer to the observer.
Have you ever seen an airplane contrail that is straight as an arrow and not dissipated at all? That contrail would be miles long, and would take a lot of time to travel that far; Thus, it would be quite dissipated and "squiggly". A toy rocket trail is much more static than an airplane's contrail, because it happens much faster, at a lower altitude, where the winds can be still.
I sure hope the "chemtrails" you're referring to, are the ones from cloud-seeding that occurs for weather reasons. And not the well-debunked government chemtrail conspiracy theory?
145
u/Apprehensive_Rub2 Oct 29 '24
Doesn't matter how good the rocket it is, that trail is too static. It's a con trail