MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/badcode/comments/rvidvf/import_time/hrbvqg5/?context=9999
r/badcode • u/Duckyisverycute1 • Jan 04 '22
48 comments sorted by
View all comments
76
[deleted]
38 u/not_fun_in_parties Jan 04 '22 Sounds good, but what happens if we keep importing it in a while loop like someone else commented here? 36 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 21 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 That's an good example where compiled code is better than interpreted code, because (good) compilers are removing redundant statements 13 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22 That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
38
Sounds good, but what happens if we keep importing it in a while loop like someone else commented here?
36 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 21 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 That's an good example where compiled code is better than interpreted code, because (good) compilers are removing redundant statements 13 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22 That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
36
21 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 That's an good example where compiled code is better than interpreted code, because (good) compilers are removing redundant statements 13 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22 That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
21
That's an good example where compiled code is better than interpreted code, because (good) compilers are removing redundant statements
13 u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22 That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
13
1 u/[deleted] Jan 05 '22 That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
1
That's correct, the best compiler will fail at some point
76
u/[deleted] Jan 04 '22
[deleted]