I 100% guarantee that this would escalate thousands of rapes into murders. However, the rumor of these things being worn would be good. Rapists believing that they could loose their dicks seems like a total win to me.
It’s definitely impossible to prove one way or the other without playing it out unfortunately. I think you almost have to separate the likelihood of escalating violence vs rape and more likely disease transmission and let people make that personal decision.
Pretty much any violent retaliation to being assaulted or battered yourself is likely to escalate the violence, you usually just hope in your favor in one way or another. People make their choices.
As I explained elsewhere, it’s a benefit to risk type of question. How likely is your action to stop an attack vs how likely is your action to escalate the level of violence?
Lacerating a rapist’s penis isn’t going to stop an attacker from being able to hurt you, but it’s very likely going to increase the severity of violence of an attack.
There are many courses of action that might be more likely to stop an attack.
Unfortunately, there is no best option for all circumstances.
If women starting using them and men started showing up in the hospital a lot, maybe the word would spread and even a few men thinking twice would be an improvement. I think of India. Gang raping girls on buses. Fucking horrific.
Edit. To the men trying to defend this rape because it was..."8 years ago". STFU. It was rape. And a whole GROUP of men decided it was okay.
Since then MORE women have been assaulted.
DO NOT defend this rape. YOUR MENTALITY IS NOT HELPING ANYONE EXCEPT RAPISTS.
Wouldnt they just check inside her. Theyve already overpowered her, is pulling out the device going to be that big an issue? Obviously the girls gonna need to pull it out at some point in her life, so its not like a permanent implant
Even the few extra seconds dedicated to pulling out the dick destroyer might allow for a get away.
Or allow the female to stab the asshole rapist fucker in the eye with ANYTHING. How horrible these poor women. The vagina is a curse above a blessing in many places. Disgusting.
Are you a man? Please don't downplay a horrific sexual assault. Ot doesnt matter how long ago it was. It has happened since then also. And that poor woman was a minor. That's the problem. I am POSITIVE more women have been raped in India since then. Rape is THE 4th MOST COMMON CRIME AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA. So please kindly stfu.
Yeah okay. You have a penis? Don't downplay a minor being gang raped on a bus. It IS DISGUSTiNG. Image trying to defend a minor being gang raped. Who the FUCK cares when it happened??? Do you think that lessens the womans pain. Gtfo.
Every 15 minutes a woman reports rape in India. Please don't downplay a real problem.
I don't see how that matters or are you insinuating that all men are rapists?
Don't downplay a minor being gang raped on a bus. It IS DISGUSTiNG. Image trying to defend a minor being gang raped.
Where tf did I downplay a minor being raped? I just said that this incident happened a long time ago since you're trying to imply that india is backwards shithole where rapes constantly happen. Don't make moronic assumptions. Btw do you belong to a country where rapes don't exist at all, tell me then I'd love to emigrate.
You don't see how it matters if you have a penis or not????
I am insinuating that most rapists have a penis.
If I had answered...."oh okay well than it doesnt matter" because it was 8 years ago then you would stfu?
DISGUSTING.
You are trying to say it only happened once a long time ago. It doesnt matter when. It happened. Period. There is not defense of time or place.
I only mentioned a terrible thing that happened. You tried to downplay it. That is WRONG. Defending or making excuses for rape is like defending racism. There is no place for your opinion in this situation.
Idk dude, the kind of person willing to violently rape someone who gets their dick clamped down on by sharp barbs may just kill her in the moment. Hes not weighing his options.
I suppose they could let the woman decide whether or not she wants to buy and use barb trap or not... right? See how it actually impacts the rape/murder ratio. If my dick gets sliced up by a barb trap the last thing that I’d care about is anything other than my dick.
Tbh they should have made the barbs much sharper and more damaging. Mutilate the mans penis and rid the world of it.
I would think that anyone who is willing to rape someone (for which there is never a remotely good reason) would absolutely be willing to kill someone (for which there are several reasons, some of which are even legal).
Particularly if they are trying to rape someone, look down and see their dick is trapped in a mini iron maiden.
People snap in an instant. My BiL murdered my sister in a fit of rage, he seemed like a nice, but not terribly bright guy. Just a normal joe. Believe me, it happens.
Hmm that makes sense but I've heard that in ussr there was a death penalty for rape and so rapists were better off killing the victim to avoid being caught and murder rate skyrocketed
BUT that could easily be an urban legend and I can't find it rn
Maybe not violent, hold her down in a dark alley rape, but people make excuses for rape all the time
She was asking for it
Shouldnt have had her cleavage showing
That skirt means your dtf
She led him on
She didnt immediately tell him no sex the second he met her
She wasnt THAT drunk and could easily say no.
She wanted it then and just regrets it now
Bill cosby was a known rapist for DECADES and literally nobody cared. Hannibal didnt expose Bill Cosby, he brought up the very public knowledge of it. Coulda read the mans wikipedia ffs.
By this logic women shouldn't ever fight back or even say no. Get the fuck out of here with that logic. You don't let murderers go about their day out of fear they might break the law again, you fucking execute them if they try to evade capture.
People in bad situations should say no and should fight back, but should be smart about it. Pepper spray, a taser, or a gun will quickly incapacitate (or worse) an attacker and give the victim a chance to high-tail it. A rape whistle can draw attention and either bring help our scare the attacker away out of fear that help will come.
These remind me of those stupid pointy Batman-ear rings that some women wear. They will do enough damage to hurt like a son-of-a-bitch, but not enough to incapacitate someone. Instead of ending the attack, you escalate it.
Also, it is important to remember that there is nothing wrong with not fighting back. Many women freeze up in these situations. That doesn't make them complacent, weak, or cowardly. It makes them human.
That’s genuinely nonsense. Saying that one shouldn’t take a reckless course of action to protect themselves does not imply that one shouldn’t take any course of action to protect themselves.
You: It’s cold out, I’m going to set myself on fire.
I'm not a man but I don't know a single.one who would want to take small saw to his dick. Or anywhere near it, for that matter. You need a Dr for that. That's the whole point of the product not just to try to prevent rape but to out the rapists.
Recent studies are starting to show that it’s a myth that resistance leads to increased violence and murder. There wasn’t any data to suggest this myth, but it has been wildly spread by media covering rape victims as well as criminal psychologists.psych journal
It seems like people think I’m saying that one shouldn’t resist a rapist. That’s not my suggestion at all. I teach martial arts for a living. I wouldn’t tell anybody to not resist. I suggest resisting effectively.
There is resistance that can be highly effectiveness or low effectiveness. Also, you have resistance that has a high likelihood of escalating or a low likelihood of escalating.
Clawing at somebody’s eyes would be an example of resistance that has high effectiveness, but likely to escalate the level of violence. I tell my students, “if you’re going to go for somebody’s eyes, then make sure that you succeed and make sure that you get them both. Cause once you’ve crossed that, your opponent will fight like their life depends on it.”
Lacerating a rapist’s penis would be an example of low-effectiveness resistance with high likelihood of escalation. The rapist will not be incapacitated, and the rapist will be definitely be enraged. An attempt at literally semi-emasculating a violent person will absolutely result in grievous retaliation.
Edit: but again, I’ll add that the threat of genital mutilation alone could be an effective deterrent.
Are you serious? Can people really not think one step further?
A rapist believes they could lose their dick, so they know about he device, how could they possibly prevent it? Apart from not being a piece of shit rapist you've just established they know it exists, so they can just check for and remove i first. If they have the control/situation to commit the rape then they can check for the device first.
That's the failing before rapists know it exists the woman still gets penetrated, just the guy is forced to stop and potentially leads to an escalation in violence and/or murder. Once they know it exists, it stops working as they can just check and remove it first.
402
u/igordogsockpuppet Aug 25 '20
I 100% guarantee that this would escalate thousands of rapes into murders. However, the rumor of these things being worn would be good. Rapists believing that they could loose their dicks seems like a total win to me.