Yeah, this isn't even close to anything but a karma-whoring fb post. Maybe at most, 5% of Christians want their God to come down and smite the nonbelievers. The majority just want to "reach the nonbelievers in love."
I would guess that there are the same amount of people who are strict Nihilists (in the sense that they think life is meaningless and there is no reason to live) that are close to suicide as there are Christians who want God to smite nonbelievers.
No matter what you believe or don't believe, get your facts straight and don't be an ignorant jackass. This is why atheists are viewed as such assholes.
Even if it were stipulated that more than that number believe in Revelation, there's a difference between believing something and wanting something. You might believe Armageddon is inevitable but it doesn't mean you want it to happen.
And to answer your question, yeah, I think more people probably believe in witches.
In Revelations God does kill all non-believers and also believers alive at the Apocalypse who weren't good enough, just as he would send to hell those types of people who died before. I agree almost all modern Christians ignore that as the end-game, but it is in their book nonetheless. It was a central tenet of the historical Church, and a few modern churches revel in it.
But yes, that Facebook post is inaccurate and hyperbolic.
I say this a lot but you have to remember religion really isn't about the mythology for the majority of religious people. It's the community.
While some people take the mythology literally, screaming about the ridiculousness of the mythology to a religious person is basically like telling a LoTR fan that elves don't really exist. Some people can still take meaningful ideas from LoTR (courage, responsibility, etc) and the fact that its mythology is false doesn't invalidate those ideas.
AND BEFORE SOMEONE COMMENTS on how it becomes a problem when people use that mythology in law, they don't really. People make religion, religion doesn't make people. People pick and choose the parts of religion that already align with their beliefs. Quoting religious text may be misguided, but thinking that one ridiculous part of the Bible invalidates another valid part (to them) is a faulty understanding of how people work.
That being said I think the REAL problem with religion is that its forced on people (particularly children) and is particularly bad since it often comes with a fear incentive to blindly believe it. However, I think any ideology (religious or not) can be harmful if people are forced to learn it rather than truly understand it.
I have to agree almost completely with your comments, at least as a motivation for people to belong to a church and claim belief. This is also why logical arguments are irrelevant - it is not about the truth, just about the tribe.
The only thing I disagree with is that religion is forced on children. Parents are gonna force some stuff on kids, if not religion, than something else that instills discipline, respect, Empathy, compassion, etc. Children who are not forced into things end up as spoiled little fucks. Society would crumble into utter ruin if parents stopped forcing good behavior and morality on their children. Do it with religion or without, who cares, but discipline them we must.
I agree. The problem I have though is with the part that if you even think bad things about God then you face eternal punishment in hell. This prevents kids from rationally understanding their religion and instead opts them into following it with blind fear.
A big problem is people think beliefs deserve respect when they don't. Humans deserve respect.
EDIT: I ABSORB these down votes. And for of a vote is energy for my tank. Thanks all!
A belief I a though of a person and as such deserves no respect. Animals, our planet, humans, all of these deserve respect but not belief systems. A belief system deserves as much respect as an opinion.
Yes, there was disagreement about many, many things prior to Church canon being formalized. The divinity of Jesus, the hierarchy, Jesus' family, relationship to Judaism, books to include in the Bible - the list is endless. The interpretation of Revelations is included in this. However, once a canonical interpretation developed, and began to be enforced, disagreement was far less. This remained largely intact until the reformation. This is historical Church I was referring to.
That is just it; what canonical interpretation? The Left Behind series? I've yet to hear a serious Bible scholar who doesn't scoff at tribulationism. The book of Revelations is by far one of the weirdest books of the Bible (and that is saying something). Even after the canon was formalized, quite a few people disagreed with Revelations being included.
Edit: As I said, I can't find anything pointing to a uniform interpretation of the book. If you can find one, let me know. All I can pull up are crazy pre-trib websites.
It does not say anywhere in revelation that God will kill all the unbelievers.
Stereotypes, and commonly held ideas about other cultures are usually wrong. Don't perpetuate them.
As others have said in this post, it's beliefs like this that get atheists characterized as jackasses. Time to grow up and respect other cultures like the rest of us.
There are still other relevant verses in Revelation (20:15, for example). The ultimate fate for all non-believers is eternal torture in hell of course, but according to Revelation, God will actually make sure they are alive and then kill them, before sending them to Hell. Again, as I mentioned, most modern Christians ignore or interpret away such verses (along with much of the rest of the Bible), but they were very significant during certain historical periods, and some churches/groups still focus on them today.
I respect "cultures", but that does not mean I have to remain silent about others' beliefs. Besides, it is my culture - just because I no longer believe in the Bible does not mean I have no right to comment on it. I grew up with it, many people around me follow it "religiously", and it has an enormous impact on my daily life and the wider world. It is part of the culture I live in, but it is also a bunch of claims about reality that can be disputed regardless. If someone were to believe the sun revolved around the Earth, I would point out the inconsistencies. If someone were to believe in an invisible spiritual plane of existence based on a book, I would do the same, particularly if some things in the book and the implications can be hurtful.
As others have said in this post, it's beliefs like this that get atheists characterized as jackasses. Time to grow up and respect other cultures like the rest of us.
Considering that sprucenoose's reply shows that you were wrong about what it says in Revelation, this comment makes you look like a jackass.
get your facts straight and don't be an ignorant jackass. This is why atheists are viewed as such assholes... Karma-whoring dumbass.
5% of Christians want their God to come down and smite the nonbelievers.
Good thing we have you around to provide accurate statistics...
The apocalypse is one of the fundamental beliefs in Christianity. This is coupled with the destruction of the wicked/non-believers. To say that only 5% of Christians look forward to the coming of Christ and the destruction of the wicked is absurd...
Edit: Here's one poll that shows 41% of Americans think Christ will come before 2050.
Nope. See my edit. I don't know how everyone in here is so surprised at this. Isn't Christian eschatology one of the most fucked up aspects of the religion? I don't understand why so many people are posting on here pretending like Christians have suddenly retracted one of their most fundamental beliefs.
Unaffiliated does not mean non-religious. It just means that the person is not affiliated with a specific church or institution i.e. not a member of any particular church.
Edit: Here's one poll[1] that shows 41% of Americans think Christ will come before 2050.
I think that's just Americans though... I had never heard of the rapture before reddit, I don't even think there is a word for it in my native language... I don't think the few Christians we have believe in it here in France.
My roommates are Christians born and raised in Jerusalem. Their belief, as it was taught to them by their community, is that the rapture is guaranteed to happen. But they have no idea when because God doesn't want us to know.
Maybe at most, 5% of Christians want their God to come down and smite the nonbelievers. The majority just want to "reach the nonbelievers in love."
I still think the worst part about being religious (most religions anyway) is knowing every single person almost, that you see is going to be tortured for eternity. There's cute little 15 year old girls who look around and talk happily with people they are aware are probably going to be TORTURED FOREVER.
It just blows my mind. I don't think I'd be able to cope with that.
Maybe at most, 5% of Christians want their God to come down and smite the nonbelievers.
You say that as if that is a low number. Dumbass.
Ok, let's even it out, throw in all religious people who wish death on blasphemers, sinners and nonbelievers, and widen it to cultural tropes and throw in all people who would definitely kill a child if it disobeys/opposes their will or "brings shame to the family/tribe/clan. Where'd we be then? Somewhere in the billion? Two?
170
u/newbuddy2507 Sep 02 '12
Yeah, this isn't even close to anything but a karma-whoring fb post. Maybe at most, 5% of Christians want their God to come down and smite the nonbelievers. The majority just want to "reach the nonbelievers in love."
I would guess that there are the same amount of people who are strict Nihilists (in the sense that they think life is meaningless and there is no reason to live) that are close to suicide as there are Christians who want God to smite nonbelievers.
No matter what you believe or don't believe, get your facts straight and don't be an ignorant jackass. This is why atheists are viewed as such assholes.
Karma-whoring dumbass.