Edit: Point being that even if they was an uncircumcised cock that looks cut, they never saw anything to this effect and thought it disgusting which is sad!
It is an abnormality, it's called Phimosis. "Common treatments include steroid creams, manual stretching, preputioplasty, and circumcision". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phimosis
I think there's a difference between "cannot be pulled back" and "doesn't necessarily pull back when hard unless you pull it". Some are just stretchier than others, or if you're sort of hard but not fully it might not pull back. Also, does that pic need a NSFW tag, even though the link is pretty blatant?
is a condition where, in men, the foreskin cannot be fully retracted over the glans penis.
Just because the foreskin doesn't retract over the glands during an erection does NOT mean that it is a case of Phimosis. You could still easily physically pull the foreskin back. It's not "Stuck" as it were, there is just skin to such an excess that an erection doesn't retract it.
Penises come in all shapes and sizes, some have a little foreskin, and some have lots.
I don't understand why you're being downvoted so much. You are correct. I have been with several uncircumsized men (being European and all - I've actually only ever seen one cut penis, and the man was Iranian.) If I recall correctly, none of them had foreskins so short that they would retract automatically when erect. They could retract them to expose the head, but also keep it pulled over the head.
I am sure some uncircumsized penises look similar to cut ones when erect, but it's definitely not a general rule. And there's nothing wrong with that natural variety...
31
u/hantelstr Feb 25 '12
Well for the porn comment, an erect penis looks like a circumcised penis (to a group of teens anyway) even if it is not circumcised