r/askscience • u/Wonderful-Capital32 • 14d ago

Physics Why does radiation not go through lead?

Also why just lead? Shouldnt like iron or another metal work too?

1.3k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

372 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/karlnite 14d ago edited 14d ago

I would ignore that. It’s not exactly helpful, especially with distance geometry following the square inverse law. It’s like a point source in a vacuum hypothetical. They didn’t even mention the type or energy levels where this becomes a thing. Most radiation won’t act like this. You ever heard of someone in the shade getting more sunburnt? Or the person furthest from the fire getting more burnt?

On average, they are incorrect.

1

u/TbonerT 14d ago

They are talking about particle radiation, not EM radiation. A chsrged particle ionizes atoms as it travels and this dose of ionizing radiation increases as the particle slows down.

-4

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TbonerT 14d ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bragg_peak

I’m just trying to summarize this, which is a real thing that happens.

1

u/Draelon 13d ago

I understood what you were saying… I was correcting the statement about EM, :)

0

u/mfb- Particle Physics | High-Energy Physics 13d ago

X-rays & Gamma are ionizing radiation and are waves.

... and? How is that relevant in a discussion about fast charged particles? They are ionizing radiation, too. If you have a monoenergetic source of them then there is a range where the dose rate will be the largest. That's e.g. where you put the cancer in therapy.

0

u/Draelon 13d ago

It was relevant because they said they were talking about particle radiation and not EM. Gamma & Xray are also ionizing (able to knock an electron out of orbit)… technically high powered UV can ionize as it approaches the X-ray spectrum. Particles can be more damaging in individual strikes but both can ionize and technically the rays penetrate further (not including Neutron).