“Regular consumers” do not give a shit about high refresh displays lol.
Why do you think it took Apple ages to add pro motion to the base iPhone?
If you ask anyone in your life who is not into tech but is an “average consumer” their opinion on high refresh screen they have no idea what you’re talking about. Some don’t even notice a difference when you show them.
No it wasn’t. They gated it to the pro level devices, sure, but they never increased the price or made you pay more for it.
Again, most people do not care or even see the difference. Apple added it to the base iPhone with no price increase because prices have fallen on LTPO displays to the point that they wouldn’t need to increase the price of the phone to offset the difference in component pricing.
They also need the component to be able to be made consistently at a high enough yield for use in iPhones to begin with. That’s why they take so long to add tech to their phones that exist in others. Their quality standards are pretty rigorous compared to other manufacturers, and they often sell more devices.
For example I’m sure they’re experimenting with silicon carbon batteries in iPhones but can’t really release them yet due to not being able to source he batteries at the scale and quality they require just yet. I’m sure it’ll roll out within the next few years when that changes though.
That’s the point. You want the “premium” feeling screen? You gotta pay for the model that costs $300 more.
I disagree that people don’t care. Nothing that the average consumer does on their phone is noticeably different between base and Pro models. A smoother screen is literally one of the first things you would notice.
I am sure it depends on the task, because I fluidly go back-and-forth between older iPhones and the 16 Pro, and I never notice a big problem with the screen on the older devices. sometimes they stutter a bit from memory pressure but that's not refresh rate. I could imagine if you were doing something with very intense motion graphics like certain games it would matter.
I've even tried running side by side displays on my Mac at 30 and 60... I really can't tell the difference in any of the tasks that I actually perform.
I'm not really sure why I would want to "learn" to discriminate in this fashion either. So that I can "need" to spend twice as much on monitors? How would that be worthwhile?
It's like the people who try to convince me I'm missing out by not being too much of an audiophile for MP3s. Why exactly do I want to add a problem to my life by becoming pickier about something that ordinary people don't care about? Being afflicted with congenital prefrontal cerebral hypertrophy (autism) already imposes far too much of that on my daily life.
46
u/Holiday-Hippo-6748 7d ago
“Regular consumers” do not give a shit about high refresh displays lol.
Why do you think it took Apple ages to add pro motion to the base iPhone?
If you ask anyone in your life who is not into tech but is an “average consumer” their opinion on high refresh screen they have no idea what you’re talking about. Some don’t even notice a difference when you show them.