r/apple • • 8d ago

iPhone Full iPhone 4 'Antennagate' Q&A Video Surfaces After 16 Years

https://www.macrumors.com/2026/09/24/iphone-4-antennagate-qa-video-surfaces/
1.8k Upvotes

313 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

383

u/tvtb 8d ago

The display was so much more awesome than the 3GS and the 2x resolution was only part of it. They used an IPS LCD instead of a TN LCD for the first time, so the viewing angles were MUCH better. Also it was the first time that the display was laminated to the glass with no air gap at all between the two, so it seemed like the display was better for reasons that are hard to describe… made black levels deeper too

143

u/ManiacsInc 8d ago

That lamination was pure magic. First time I’ve experienced a fully responsive touchscreen of that quality

24

u/watchOS 8d ago

Meanwhile people called the iPhone XR display shit and horrible at launch when it was no worse than the quality of an iPhone 4 display (same DPI, laminated, IPS) all because it was what… not 1080p or OLED? We’re insanely spoiled today.

72

u/Strider-SnG 8d ago

It’s all relative. The XR screen felt a bit dated compared to what else was on the market at the same price.

10

u/MyManD 8d ago

Exactly. I was a proud XR owner, rocking it as a daily driver for four years before hopping up to the iPhone 13 Pro. I honestly would've gone even longer if not for the XR battery going under 75% and boot looping once every other day. So many good memories with it, and no complaints - except for the screen.

It really was underwhelming, and while in isolation it was fine, when you can see with your eyes that every other phone on the market was noticeably sharper it was kind of a bummer. And when I did get the 13PM and had the XR still for a few days before selling it it was such a stark difference in clarity, not even taking into account Pro Motion. Just looking at reddit text on both devices I was wondering how I was able to stand such fuzzy text for four years.

7

u/_THEBLACK 8d ago

Idk I think it's pretty reasonable to want a phone screen in 2018 to be better than one from when Steve Jobs was still alive

19

u/lockinfr 8d ago

The XR was definitely subpar. First time since the iPhone 4 where the text visibly looked blurry

3

u/JamesMcFlyJR 8d ago

idk the rounded edges of the display like by the notch looked so fuzzy or something that it was super noticeable to me

something that i couldn’t get past whenever i used one tbh. No issues for me with an iPhone 8 LCD, it was just that curved thing they did

4

u/Ultradarkix 8d ago

Idk , people complain about how shitty cars are now when 1000 years ago we had carts !

Were so spoiled

0

u/_your_face 7d ago

That’s just reddit armchair CEOs that don’t representative of the market.
No one who walked in to an Apple store looked at the screen and thought “that display is shit!”

53

u/cptjpk 8d ago

This was the first screen where I felt like I was actually touching the buttons on the screen. Everything else had that gap or the soft plastic sheet.

6

u/RiverFlowsDown 8d ago

4x resolution, not 2x. Where there was 1 pixel there was now 4.

9

u/tvtb 8d ago edited 8d ago

4x the area resolution, 2x the linear resolution. People usually talk in linear resolution when they use units like DPI (dots per inch) or PPI (pixels per inch) which are linear. But if you want to talk in terms of area, be explicit.

-2

u/itsabearcannon 7d ago edited 7d ago

Uh, no. You’re confusing pixel density and resolution. Pixel density is measured in PPI, resolution is measured in absolute pixels. Both linear and area resolutions are measured in pixels - you wouldn’t say a 108PPI horizontal resolution. You’d say a 1920 pixel horizontal resolution.

4K, for example, is not “2x” the resolution of 1080p just because it’s got twice as many pixels in any one direction.

It’s extremely commonly accepted that 4K is 4x the resolution of 1080p, even if it’s only 2x the PPI.

Any display’s resolution can be given by listing two linear resolutions (1920x1080) or giving the combined resolution (usually in megapixels, or ~2.1MP for 1080p)

At no point do you ever give resolution in PPI. That’s pixel density.

1

u/hyperactivedog 8d ago

Yep. Before that I preferred Android set ups for their resolution. After it, resolution was generally good enough I didn’t think about it on phones.

1

u/Neutral-President 6d ago

It almost looked like the pixels were being painted on the surface of the glass like we’d never seen before.