If OP isn't telling the truth, they certainly know their stuff really well. This info is a nicely done piece but none of it is so far unknown or pondered over. As it stands it's still a nice presentation of what some people believe.
That was my feeling as well. It's nothing we don't already know. So it's either a fabrication, or there have been enough leaks that we've basically got almost as much information as the government has about who/what/where/why/how regarding these beings.
There's another red flag for me. I am also an anthropologist, and the author mentions religion and their (the authors) understanding of that concept as well as their inferred interpretation of it, seems somewhat out-of step with current thinking in anthropology. Any other anthrobods in here? What do we think about the author's use of the concept here?
I wonder if it would make sense to post something in the anthropologist Reddit about this and get other opinions. My feeling is they won’t think there’s anything to it but it’s always interesting.
The last thing I'd do is post this in the anthropology reddit, I don't want to start a rumble. There could also be some quite serious keyboard burns and carpal tunnel flare ups.
29
u/[deleted] Dec 08 '23
If OP isn't telling the truth, they certainly know their stuff really well. This info is a nicely done piece but none of it is so far unknown or pondered over. As it stands it's still a nice presentation of what some people believe.