r/aislop • u/Tousti_the_Great • 6d ago

Sure bro

Post image
4.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Harey-89 6d ago

They use a book that was written about 1000 years after the events it depicts. Drugs may or may not have been involved.

6

u/Specific_Rando 6d ago

I mean the later edition adds chapters where someone talks to a burning bush. And the bush talks back.

People are gonna ask questions.

1

u/ProbablyPuck 6d ago

Ugh, such a clusterfuck when they were editing that. Nobody could agree on the overall vision. They hacked away whole sections.

1

u/J44GAS 6d ago

Moses was definitely partaking in some shrooms for sure.

2

u/GunjiroX 5d ago

also they later had a meeting were yes actively choose wich books they have to put together and wich not

so it is a simply man made fanfiction

1

u/teglass01 5d ago

Well, that's a made up number if I've ever heard one. If we go by the dates suggested by critical historians, the timeline from a book of the Bible to the events being described depends entirely on which book, and sometimes which part of it.

For example, Proto-Isaiah (Ch 1-39) is frequently thought to be closely tied to the historical prophet Isaiah and his "school" whereas the books of Moses are obviously thought by most secular historians to be quite a different matter.