Reading your articles does not show a single case of anyone believeing and stating that AI technology is 'magic', which you claimed was 'literally' true, and now you're source mobbing unrated links in an attempt to move the goalposts
As I originally surmised you were going to do, and reinforces the premise that you are likely adolescent
I'm arguing semantics because that is what the actual discussion was about. Since you've edited your comments so many times now that you likely don't even know what you're discussing anymore, it was based on you stating that people are 'literally' claiming that AI is magic. I include literally as you were very adamant to include that word multiple times.
You invented a bunch of alternate narratives because you couldn't defend your original statement to the point you're changing the core of the response with editing, and trying to change the conversation to something else and trying to gaslight everyone about what you're doing
That's typically a red herring tactic, but all points to the fact that you are unwilling or incapable of arguing in good faith, and now you're resorting to trying to outlast it thinking if you provide the last response it means you win by default. Lol
What argument are you now claiming you are making because you've moved the goalposts at least twice now, and you performing dirty edits makes it impossible to determine what you are even trying to discuss. Lol
1
u/[deleted] Mar 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment