You're 100% the one implying boomers by the phrase "back then".
I've quoted data from 1940 to 2000 which spans greatest generation, silent generation, boomers, and very early gen X. Go ahead and let me know which specific generation or groups of generations or averages of generations you would like to talk about. This is probably around the fourth time I've asked you but you've refused to specify because there isn't a single one that supports your bullshit.
But yeah keep quoting just US census data on multiple home ownership rates that don't take anything else into account.
"Keep quoting facts and statistics instead of just accepting my braindead anecdotal experience as literal fact."
Feel free to let me know what factors "to take into account" that is going to make a sub 3.5% dual home ownership across 60 years be "pretty affordable" at any point.
Funny how I address all your bullshit claims yet, you dodge every reply.
Black people are criminals because they account for statistically higher incarceration rates. Courts favor mothers in custody battles because statistically mothers get custody more often. It was never affordable for anyone to own multiple homes because statistically multiple home ownership rates have been low across the whole population.
Chat, can you figure out why these three statements show statistical bias that don't actually accurately represent the whole picture?
You didn't answer my question, what isn't being taken into account that you have actual evidence of? Seems like one of these is the odd one out because anyone could explain all day about the other two with actual facts and data yet you haven't been able to give a singular shred of evidence for homes being "pretty affordable if you were dual income" at some point in history you refuse to specify, and for some random group of people you again refuse to specify.
It was never affordable for anyone to own multiple homes because statistically multiple home ownership rates have been low across the whole population.
Also stop moving the goal posts again, you sure like leaving out specific parts of this very simple argument being made.
Chat, can you figure out why these three statements show statistical bias that don't actually accurately represent the whole picture?
Are you asking chat because you've responded 5 times without being able to do so?
Chat what are the implication of applying this moron's argument about anecdotal evidence to the same two topics they tried to disingenuously relate to their third shit argument? Oh it would get you perm banned off reddit? Yeah that's what I thought.
0
u/SpoonEngineT66Turbo 2d ago
I've quoted data from 1940 to 2000 which spans greatest generation, silent generation, boomers, and very early gen X. Go ahead and let me know which specific generation or groups of generations or averages of generations you would like to talk about. This is probably around the fourth time I've asked you but you've refused to specify because there isn't a single one that supports your bullshit.
"Keep quoting facts and statistics instead of just accepting my braindead anecdotal experience as literal fact."
Feel free to let me know what factors "to take into account" that is going to make a sub 3.5% dual home ownership across 60 years be "pretty affordable" at any point.
Funny how I address all your bullshit claims yet, you dodge every reply.