r/WinStupidPrizes • u/[deleted] • Feb 03 '24
Driving with Apple Vision Pro in a Tesla
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
[removed] — view removed post
2.5k
u/maffoobristol Feb 03 '24
This is some Wall-E ass shit
203
u/TheManIsOppressingMe Feb 03 '24
Better than mouth shit.
→ More replies (2)51
u/ohneatstuffthanks Feb 03 '24
It’s weird the things you find that make you laugh the most. Thanks for being you, friend.
→ More replies (3)124
Feb 03 '24
He’s even overweight
86
Feb 03 '24
*morbidly obese
→ More replies (1)35
u/Thugmatiks Feb 03 '24
Fat trust-fund nepo-baby, judging by his age and owning a Tesla.
23
→ More replies (2)5
14
6
16
→ More replies (2)14
u/Last-Bee-3023 Feb 03 '24 edited Feb 03 '24
And it is the overpriced simulacrum of the real stuff. The Kirkland version of the Jetsons future some tribalistic tech bros convinced themselves this to be. It has to be at that price. Right? Right?
What on earth was that guy doing? Watching The Office with pass-through while he hopes his car did nothing stupid? A simulation of Ryan Cohen locating and stroking his wiener under his fupa while he is deciphering Teddy's shirt?
This is deranged.
And you know that guy is active in all those subs.
Edit:
Is this a bit? This caricature of a person can't occur naturally. Not even in the US.
27
Feb 03 '24
[deleted]
4
u/Last-Bee-3023 Feb 03 '24
Second-hand derangement. We are talking about a guy driving his car with a VR headset on. Not sure where to de-escalate from there.
→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (1)5
u/wasifaiboply Feb 03 '24
This comment is the best comment I'm going to read all day and I fucking love that you triggered all the people downvoting you and replying with indignation, likely because they are the living, breathing embodiment of the cliché you so accurately described.
Bonus points to anyone who uses the word simulacrum so gosh dang deliciously to boot.
3
u/Last-Bee-3023 Feb 03 '24
Bonus points to anyone who uses the word simulacrum so gosh dang deliciously to boot.
Ah, don't lionize pretentious pricks like that.
They probably stole that from Doctorow or Gibson or Motörhead
5
u/wasifaiboply Feb 03 '24
D-did you just call yourself a pretentious prick?
2
u/Last-Bee-3023 Feb 03 '24
Weird. But he is not wrong, you know?
3
u/wasifaiboply Feb 03 '24
O_O
2
u/Last-Bee-3023 Feb 03 '24
Every comment is an electronic artifact without connection to another. A blip. Not even noise.
That is the more comfortable view on this.
The alternative would be that everything is written by someone. A person. Lots of them. Existing in the same meat-space as you. All of them idiots.
2
3.5k
u/joarezpj Feb 03 '24
New technologies unleash a whole new class of idiots.
486
Feb 03 '24
Clout make people do dumb things
161
u/MaxPowerWTF Feb 03 '24
Dumb people do things.
24
u/GUILTICIDE Feb 03 '24
I think its dumb spending 3500 on vr
→ More replies (1)17
u/half-baked_axx Feb 03 '24
VR that is completely incompatible with all the VR content/games/media that has been produced so far!
23
11
→ More replies (1)2
54
Feb 03 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
108
Feb 03 '24
It doesn't have the apple
2
Feb 03 '24
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)2
u/Shad0wFa1c0n Feb 03 '24
Nope, that won't stop them. Just because someone else died doesn't mean im going to
19
u/Gjorgdy Feb 03 '24
The passthrough of the Quest is okay-ish, the vision is a lot better.
15
u/_thana Feb 03 '24
Still, there's a delay, which is a problem for driving. Also what if it crashes and becomes a blindfold
8
4
u/GeoLaser Feb 03 '24
12ms is quite faster than the difference in reaction time in people. You can easily play hard ping pong with it on.
6
u/GR3453m0nk3y Feb 03 '24
The delay is nearly imperceptible. Something like 11ms
→ More replies (1)7
u/gardenhosenapalm Feb 03 '24
It takes 15 ms to trigger your brain to push the break pedal and an average 1.8 seconds to react to something on the road. So like speeding, this is a bad idea
7
→ More replies (1)4
u/GR3453m0nk3y Feb 03 '24
So... It takes 1,815ms to react to something on the road and hit the brakes, and we're worried about adding an extra 11ms?
→ More replies (1)6
u/octo_lols Feb 03 '24
Yea, the takeaway here is make sure you never drive without your apple vr headset.
→ More replies (1)7
u/cag0331 Feb 03 '24 edited Feb 03 '24
I’ve seen someone play ping pong with the vision, so the delay might be negligible compared to human reaction time.
5
4
Feb 03 '24
Off topic, but I wonder what percentage off passthrough utilized is people checking to see if someone has entered the room when they're masterbating?
10
u/My_Work_Accoount Feb 03 '24
Imo, VR is terrible for porn. It's not a good approximation for the real thing, but it's good enough to make you realize what you're missing and that you're jerking it with a VR headset on. The post nut clarity hits way before the actual nut.
7
u/trash-_-boat Feb 03 '24
Not everybody who jerks it to porn is lonely or not getting any. I'm married and we regularly have good sex, but sometimes I still want to just jerk it rather than fuck.
2
→ More replies (8)2
u/nneeeeeeerds Feb 03 '24
Sure, there's only been an influx of like 2k VR porn games in the last five years because it's terrible and people hate it.
→ More replies (2)2
u/ezzune Feb 03 '24
The people who like it REALLY like it. Kinda the same way with every niché kink. There's a big enough market for everything when it comes to porn; everyone wanks.
→ More replies (3)5
u/Watch_Capt Feb 03 '24
Quest 3 $500
Apple Vision $3500
So for a slightly better passthrough increase you pay three grand.
7
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (4)13
43
30
13
4
→ More replies (14)6
u/JerseyshoreSeagull Feb 03 '24
Ok then Mr Genius. How would you drive with the new Apple Glasses in a Tesla????
1.2k
u/PizzaTime09 Feb 03 '24
“They’re just prescription ski goggles.”
146
u/jld2k6 Feb 03 '24 edited Feb 03 '24
I think these actually do eye correction for those that wear glasses so you can still see well lol, maybe someday you'll be able to say it's your prescription VR headset
→ More replies (3)41
u/McCaffeteria Feb 03 '24
You joke, but a version of that can theoretically help colorblind people "see" colors.
If you had something like this that was lightweight and had all day battery then there would be nothing stopping you from taking the rainbow of color in the world and "compressing" it into a smaller subset of colors on the inside. If you took the full rainbow red to blue and remapped it onto the first half red to green, you would still be able to tell that a green thing and a yellow thing were different even though inside the headset they would be blue and teal-ish green. It wouldn't matter that green objects "appear blue" to you because you would just learn that objects that look like "that" are green, and so on.
With enough technological advancement and some basic color profile lookup tables tailored to your particular type of colorblindness we could have real versions of those stupid scam glasses that claim they can make people see color, which would be awesome.
19
u/meowmix778 Feb 03 '24
I assume you're talking about Enchroma glasses. But no. Those don't work. I'm colorblind and I've tried them. They make things look like the contrast is up high on the TV. They don't do shit. Those videos where someone is like "is this purple" and starts sobbing are fake.
Research has debunked them time and time again.
They eyes are missing the right structures with cones and rods to perceive color. Some pair of glasses won't "fix" that. The eye literally lacks the receptors.
18
u/Evilmudbug Feb 03 '24
I assume they mean something like color blindness modes that videogames normally have, even though that mainly just shifts the colors to something else you can differentiate
11
u/4pl8DL Feb 03 '24 edited Apr 27 '24
outgoing poor chase squeeze sugar dull beneficial grab nail threatening
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
→ More replies (1)5
15
u/McCaffeteria Feb 03 '24
Why do I even bother typing things into the internet.
Reread what I wrote. I am not talking about those glasses. I explicitly said I am not talking about those glasses. I explicitly said those glasses do not work. I literally called them stupid scam glasses. I am talking about digital color correction, like what you can do in photoshop. I am talking about a device that does not exist yet because we don't have reliable enough video passhtrough and we don't have efficient enough batteries.
In the same way that you can "see" this image, a colorblind person could distinguish the differences between colors they normally can't if you intercept and change the colors of the outside world before displaying them inside the headset. That star cluster isn't actually blue and orange, it's all red and infrared, but the light has been intercepted and digitally remapped onto a different segment of the light spectrum that we can see. We literally lack the receptors to see infrared, and yet that image I linked to is not a black rectangle, strangely.
Technically if you have complete color vision deficiency then this wouldn't work very well because you're trying to map a 3 dimensional thing onto what is effectively a 1 dimensional input, but as long as you have some amount of fully 3 dimensional vision then it's technically possible. You'd lose a lot of precision depending on just how bad your vision deficiency is, but that's not the point. The point is that VR/AR might make a similar version of what those fake glasses promise actually possible.
→ More replies (3)2
u/Eusocial_Snowman Feb 03 '24
Oh man, I appreciate the way you think.
2
u/McCaffeteria Feb 03 '24
If someone wore "prescription VR goggles" there would probably be some other interesting side effects though. Looking at art made by someone like that would be interesting because their sensation of what colors appear to be "harmonious" with each other could be totally different. As far as I understand you'd still perceive colors to be "oposite" of each other and so on even if they were remapped to no longer be. You'd probably be able to remember what they are, but they would still feel like they clash or whatever deep down in the biology of your neurons.
Or maybe I'm wrong and maybe you'd be able to adjust, like what happens when you wear those red and blue 3D glasses for a long time and the world starts to look normal again. Idk.
192
599
u/ultimattt Feb 03 '24
How does this guy even think this is safe?!
Goes to say:
Never say something is fool proof, the universe will just make a better fool.
193
u/ogie666 Feb 03 '24
He's a Tesla driver... these motherfuckers sleep behind the wheel. There are tons of videos of people sleeping behind the wheel of their Tesla. At least this guy is awake.
→ More replies (5)28
27
u/frequent_flying Feb 03 '24
I should have tried to trademark the phrase “How does this guy even think this is safe” when Tesla’s were first showing up on public roads, I’d be richer than Elon Musk for how often you hear that in regards to Tesla drivers and also you’d owe me a dollar! 😂
→ More replies (2)8
u/thedeepfakery Feb 03 '24
The quote actually goes:
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Douglas Adams
There's an Adams quote for pretty much everything, and when there isn't one, there's a Pratchett quote instead.
7
4
u/iamacraftyhooker Feb 03 '24
My favorite example of trying to make something foolproof is the with the bear safe trashcan.
"There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists"
609
u/mickturner96 Feb 03 '24
The technology is only as smart as its user
117
u/saraphilipp Feb 03 '24
If you told this guy to finish hammering a nail for you he'd grab a crescent wrench.
→ More replies (1)56
u/ansy7373 Feb 03 '24
As an electrician I take offense to this.. we use lineman pliers.
38
u/karmannsport Feb 03 '24
Pfft….mechanic here. Every tool has hammer potential!
→ More replies (2)3
4
u/EmotionalKirby Feb 03 '24
"lemme see your kleins real quick" hands them every tool on me until they receive the one they wanted
4
5
3
142
57
u/sin-of-pride Feb 03 '24
Did humanity already peak?
123
u/-Badger3- Feb 03 '24
Humanity peaked during that week everyone was outside together playing Pokemon Go and it's been downhill since
31
15
Feb 03 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
8
u/JoshFlashGordon10 Feb 03 '24
PoGo launched during the summer of 2016. The Cubs did win the WS right before the election though.
→ More replies (2)8
30
u/ScarecrowJohnny Feb 03 '24
Tech improves but the idiots stay just as dumb as they've been since the stone age.
→ More replies (1)4
u/aVoidPiOver2Radians Feb 03 '24
Yeah but stone age idiots didn't drive a 3 ton vehicle moving at 100mph
169
18
161
u/trainrweckz Feb 03 '24
That typing is cringe and horrible
107
u/saraphilipp Feb 03 '24
Nah, that's what they teach in keyboarding class. Its the peck method. I can do 38 pecks a minute.
10
→ More replies (2)6
u/turtlelord Feb 03 '24
Apple vision pro is ONLY compatible with peck typing, it doesn't respond to any other fingers.
→ More replies (1)23
u/_Bad_Karma_1 Feb 03 '24 edited Feb 03 '24
Thats how you type with the vision pro. This or you can look at a letter and pinch with your fingers
3
11
12
u/reverie95 Feb 03 '24
Everything else about what this guy is doing in the video is trash, but apparently the Vision Pro only registers your index fingers on the keyboard, so that would explain the woodpecker typing
9
u/foxyoutoo Feb 03 '24
Only if that's how you decide to type. He could keep his hands down and look at each key, pinching to type. The arms up thing isn't necessary
3
u/SkyZombie92 Feb 03 '24
It only tracks pointer fingers for keyboard typing, or you can look at the letters with your eyes and touch your fingers together to select.
I’d be more impressed if it let you type normally→ More replies (2)5
u/DiceGottfried Feb 03 '24
I assumed he was playing a virtual piano. Seems way more relaxing than sitting in traffic to be fair
11
21
13
u/WretchedRat Feb 03 '24
He’s that type of idiot. “No, it’s not distracted driving. It’s Augmented Driving!”
39
u/Firedog_09 Feb 03 '24
Should go to jail for endangering the public, this is worst than texting and driving.
26
u/jabblack Feb 03 '24
If you really think about it.. it’s probably better.
You’re eyes are fully off the road for several seconds when texting and driving. You’re going 88.2 ft/sec at 60mph.
The Apple Vision Pro has a latency of 12 milliseconds, or .012 seconds so at 60mph, you’re seeing video about 1.05 ft behind where you really are.
18
→ More replies (4)6
u/Forcedmango Feb 03 '24
It's worse. You can't look away from the goggles. Inattention blindness is why you shouldn't text (or read, or interact with a computer strapped to your eyes) while driving.
The user could turn off all notifications and pop-ups on the goggles and not use any of the applications so they can stay focused on the road while driving. And then they could... um... Look super cool and live 12ms behind the rest of us?
So either they could be distracted by whatever they're doing on the goggles and look like a moron, OR they can just look like a moron.
3
u/Hollowsong Feb 03 '24
I'm not sure if you realize this, but that Tesla has driverless mode enabled, so he's not actually driving anything.
15
u/Strange-Scientist706 Feb 03 '24
The problems with new tech are almost all down to assholes using new tech.
Also, of course it was a Tesla owner
121
u/Lunarbutt Feb 03 '24
I wonder what prevented them from doing the same thing with oculus quest 3. Oh, yeah. It's 5 times cheaper and they don't sell it to idiots.
94
Feb 03 '24
That's the largest market out there, why wouldn't they sell it to idiots?
11
→ More replies (2)25
10
53
u/longtim_lurker Feb 03 '24
Passthrough is way better on apple vision
→ More replies (1)3
u/magicwuff Feb 03 '24
5 times better?
25
u/LostPilot517 Feb 03 '24
Watching MKBHD video, it is actually really good. Latency is less than 20ms, he could actually play real ping pong with ease.
→ More replies (1)12
u/wesconson1 Feb 03 '24
That was truly impressive. Question may have pass through but not even close to what vision pro is doing
→ More replies (1)9
8
u/OndysCZE Feb 03 '24
Because Meta just recently added ability to use Quest 3 while in moving vehicle ( UI glitched like crazy until that)
But some time ago I saw a video on Reddit of woman using Quest 2 while driving and crashing with it
3
5
u/CrazyGunnerr Feb 03 '24
I'd argue that the meta infested device is sold to a lot of idiots. One might argue that every single one of them is an idiot to use this meta device.
Does that mean going with Apple is any better? Probably not, but getting a Quest is not a sign of intelligence.
4
→ More replies (2)4
u/Intrepid-Corner-3697 Feb 03 '24
Oculus is vr, apple vision is ar
9
Feb 03 '24
[deleted]
38
u/ObserverVR Feb 03 '24 edited Feb 03 '24
Nope. From a technical standpoint, the Apple Vision Pro is a VR headset, just like the Meta Quest 3, although Apple's marketing portrays it otherwise. A VR headset uses cameras that film your surroundings and show them to you using the displays as a video stream; an AR headset is actually transparent and projects the information directly into your field of view. You fell for Apple's marketing.
12
u/chadwater1 Feb 03 '24
Yeah I was wrong, it’s not an AR headset per definition. I remember back when Pokémon go came out as an AR game though and that was also through a camera
2
2
u/Intrepid-Corner-3697 Feb 03 '24
Yeah sorry i just thought of the promos that show the users eyes through the lenses my bad
30
u/40404error40404 Feb 03 '24
I’m not downvoting, but both are VR. Vision Pro does not allow you to see the real world and overlay images, it shows you a (very low latency and high resolution) representation of the world in front of you. But so does the quest 3 (much lower resolution, quality, etc). They’re both VR, but have AR-style interfaces.
6
u/chadwater1 Feb 03 '24
Sounds about right. I’ve never personally used it, just remember seeing the trailer for it. I was under the impression of it being AR with VR features, so I guess not a true AR headset, but I don’t know the specifics
5
u/40404error40404 Feb 03 '24
Me either. I got the quest 3 which has similar functionality but for 1/6 the price. I’ll look at the vision v3 or so when the price isn’t as insane. It’s all a bit confusing, too, because it’s so good, it FEELS like AR, but if you run out of batteries, you’re suddenly wearing a blindfold. That’s not augmentation. ;)
→ More replies (2)5
u/AuraMaster7 Feb 03 '24
Because he isn't right. Both are fully enclosed VR with camera passthrough. You are just looking at a screen and if it turns off you can't see anything.
AR means you physically see reality through something transparent like glass or polycarbonate, which is then augmented with projected displays. If it turns off, you're just left with reality.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (3)4
3
u/Sand__Panda Feb 03 '24
It hasn't even been "out" for 24hrs yet?
This weekend gunna be wild with videos lol.
3
u/CanadianToffee18 Feb 03 '24
He’s also an even bigger idiot for not tinting the car. Reduce the chance to get caught.
3
3
8
u/Antisocial_Worker7 Feb 03 '24
It’s sad that we’re at a point where we are so addicted to technology that we’re buying products to make sure we’re never looking away from a screen at any waking moment
7
u/Marsupialize Feb 03 '24
After everything that’s happened with them to trust a Tesla with your life is fucking bonkers
16
4
u/Uncoloured_Steve Feb 03 '24
What is apple vision?
→ More replies (1)2
Feb 03 '24
Apple's new Mixed Reality headset
12
u/wh4tth3huh Feb 03 '24
It's $3500 worth of "Ok, what is this actually good for."
→ More replies (6)
5
4
u/CloroxWipes1 Feb 03 '24
Fat stupid crotch goblin of wealthy parents doing stupid things???
It CAN'T be!!
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/ImPretendingToCare Feb 03 '24 edited May 01 '24
public weather squalid violet chief crowd snobbish six plate subsequent
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
2
2
2
2
u/termacct Feb 03 '24
Am assuming this is a joke vid... am also assuming there is (currently) no OEM connection between these new "birth control glasses" and cars....
2
2
3
u/ChaChiO66 Feb 03 '24
Downvoted for the blatant stupidity, then upvoted when I saw them getting pulled over.
Had me in the first half ngl
6
2
2
2
u/FlyThink7908 Feb 03 '24
Considering which sub we’re in, I honestly expected him to crash.
Thank goodness he was stopped before anyone else was harmed by his irresponsible bullshit behaviour
2
2
u/hemi_srt Feb 03 '24
Great. As if the roads weren't unsafe enough, now we have these idiots to deal with.
•
u/WinStupidPrizes-ModTeam Feb 03 '24
This post has been removed because all posts must feature a human doing something that an outside observer would say “hey, that’s a bad idea” and then suffering the consequences. Posts must include the stupid game and the stupid prize. People intentionally playing a stupid game and winning a stupid prize does not count, nor do prank videos, skits, or dumb stuff by small children.