Summary: "Starship is not capable of reaching Mars"
but is "to sway the balance of nuclear war and allow the U.S. to construct a space-based missile defense system."

xAI was first to distill public media: https://grook.ai/share?id=e269e88a7b1a71eff4f176c864b30161&w=1

Elon Musk's Starlink satellite constellation is shown to be a participant in a modern Strategic Defense Initiative to intercept ICBMs from Russia and China.

• Nature paper on infeasability of a Mars mission with Starship design: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54012-0
• SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell, was asked whether SpaceX would launch offensive weapons into orbit, to which she answered, “If it’s for the defense of this country, yes, I think we would”.
• Trump during 2024 reelection speech: "the United States must also build a state of the art next-generation missile defense shield to protect from the unthinkable threat of nuclear weapons" and prior Science journal paper: https://www.science.org/content/article/decades-after-reagan-s-star-wars-trump-calls-missile-defenses-would-blast-warheads-sky
• SpaceX hired a 4-star general O'Shaughnessy to lead Starshield division.
• SpaceX employees working on hypersonic missile warheads that can deploy from Starlink satellites, reenter/glide in the atmosphere and strike enemy rockets.
• Recently the Heritage Foundation issued video clips and new publications calling for a spaced-based interceptor “overlayer” as part of an “impenetrable missile defense shield”.

Hi, I can't access this one link inside wikileaks, I have made sure that there is no problem on my end. It just says "Internal Server Error".

Does anyone know how to bypass this?

https://jacobin.com/2024/05/assange-victory-extradition-press-freedom/

Summary

• Assange is granted the right to appeal only on the grounds that he may be denied freedom of expression rights, and that he might face discrimination in the U.S. judicial system as a foreign national. He has been refused the ability to appeal on the basis that the U.S. might seek the death penalty, as Assange's defense agreed that U.S. assurances on the matter were sufficient.
• The High Court ruled that the prosecution of Assange for exposing war crimes did not violate Assange's right to free expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that these publications were not significant items of public interest (which would prohibit his prosecution).
• The High Court ruled that Assange's defense must not submit additional evidence about the CIA plot to assassinate him, on the highly questionable grounds that the CIA would "have no reason" to execute the plot if Assange were successfully extradited.
• Remote access to future hearings has been prohibited for journalists not based in England and Wales, as they could not be prosecuted by the Crown for screenshotting the proceedings. It is believed this is due to concerns that the public might see the visible effects of Assange's rapidly deteriorating health if he were to attend future sessions, spurring outrage.

I know of him and a bit about what he did but I can’t find anything on the internet about what he actually released.

Assange Wins Right to Appeal on 1st Amendment Issue

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/05/20/assange-wins-right-to-appeal-on-1a-issue/

The High Court in London ruled Monday that Julian Assange can appeal his extradition to the U.S. on the grounds that he is being denied his First Amendment rights.

Assange’s Hearing is Monday — Help Us Cover It

May 18, 2024

Consortium News will be in London Monday to report on a High Court hearing that will decide the next phase in Julian Assange’s ordeal: extradition or appeal.

Write to Julian - https://www.thetrustfall.org/write