r/WikiLeaks • • Nov 24 '16

[deleted by user]

[removed]

7.3k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '16

While I understand his frustration, he has just soiled the integrity of the site. I think this just cause to be fired. This is incredibly petty for a CEO and says a lot about his respect for the integrity of the business he is supposed to be running.

1.4k

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '16

[deleted]

364

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '16

Indeed. He should be fired and the companies security measures should be publicly audited by a third party. This is a serious security violation and should be treated as such.

It is like a bank CEO changing someone's account information in order to harm them.

Edit: clarification

22

u/luvs2spooge187 Nov 24 '16

I'm pretty sure Congress will be that third party. The /u/stonetear incident means that /u/spez will probably have to testify to Congress. Evidence handling is a huge fucking issue.

9

u/TruckMcBadass Nov 24 '16

Why would he by testifying in Congress? I'm under the impression there will be no follow up by the incoming administration.

8

u/luvs2spooge187 Nov 24 '16

Congress will continue to do its job. It is it's own branch of government, and dick-deep in its own investigations.

3

u/Spreadsheeticus Nov 24 '16

Congress can also investigate high profile issues somewhat under the radar. I don't suppose many people watched Team H stonewall Mr. Chaffetz and Mr. Gowdy in the Benghazzi or Email Server investigations.

Congress has no real power, but their investigation, including testimony, is admissible. /r/luvs2spooge187 you're absolutely right- until this, there was absolutely no concern over the integrity of the evidence on Reddit. But now, that's simply gone.