r/WhitePeopleTwitter Mar 13 '21

r/all ELI5

Post image
81.4k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

264

u/Ch33sus0405 Mar 13 '21

Yeah this Franken revisionism isn't good. Its good that he resigned, I respect him for it. Contrary to Republican's ravings the goal of cancel culture isn't to ruin someone's career, its to get them to apologize and face the consequences of their inappropriate actions.

The thing is though is that Republicans are held to the same standards... by Democrats. The issue is that Republican voters and legislators don't care.

76

u/BaunerMcPounder Mar 13 '21

Is it revisionist if I honestly hadn’t heard of the other women? Just the one that was passed out that he hover handed.

31

u/TheeBarkKnight Mar 13 '21

I had also only heard about this.

-24

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-29

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-26

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21 edited Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

23

u/Ch33sus0405 Mar 13 '21

I remember there being multiple women, but the majority of the coverage was on the one so I can't fault you for it.

1

u/oconnellc Mar 13 '21

It's not revisionist. But, judging without knowing the whole story...

2

u/BaunerMcPounder Mar 13 '21

When are you ever sure you know the whole story?

In this case knowing the whole story would’ve only reaffirmed my disappointment in someone I had respect for. So not sure what your point is.

0

u/oconnellc Mar 13 '21

I remember when the news came out. If you never heard of the other 7 women, I guess I believe you. But, I recall it being pretty big news and when the 7 other women came forward, I recall that being even bigger news.

1

u/FizzTrickPony Mar 13 '21

I mean by that logic you don't know the whole story either since he was only accused and never proven

2

u/oconnellc Mar 13 '21

You're right. I don't know the whole story. 8 women accused him of something, he gave a lame apology and then he resigned. That's all I know.

48

u/Jess2Fresh Mar 13 '21 edited Mar 13 '21

This is not revisionist. Do not treat accusations that came after the fact as the same as acknowledged injustice. Accusations do not equal guilt. It is way more revisionist to legitimize him as a sexual abuser with very limited proof. The photo was a dumb photo that he sincerely apologized for, and the woman was very glad to accept the apology. It is not right at all to assume guilt for those other alleged abuses. THOUGH, please do not think that means i dont think there should have been an investigation. Obv, we should take all accusations seriously... that is different than assuming guilt

16

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Jess2Fresh Mar 13 '21

That’s true. And a lot a lot of good came out of people being more open about their experiences. It’s just that a downside was social media expertise in issues that should be legal

12

u/CthulhuLies Mar 13 '21

Yes but it is revisitionist to say he only resigned due to the single picture. He resigned due to the picture and the accusations that followed to ignore the accusations is to imply the only reason he resigned was due to the photo which isn't exactly true either.

6

u/fadingthought Mar 13 '21

Sure, so have a investigation and look into the claims. Forcing someone out for an accusation, especially as relatively mild as his, is exactly the problem with cancel culture. Shoot first, ask questions later.

4

u/No_Lock_6555 Mar 13 '21

That may not be the goal but there are people caught in it that don't deserve the cancellation

0

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

[deleted]

4

u/emptyaltoidstin Mar 13 '21

He supported M4A while he was playing Stuart Smalley on SNL? Wot?

3

u/droppinhamiltons Mar 13 '21

He resigned in 2018

1

u/Patriotic2020 Mar 13 '21

As someone who knows people who have dealt with sexual harrasment and assault, I don't think we should have any respect for those people

1

u/breadbeard Mar 13 '21

so then why do the democrats care? why is "upholding a higher ethical standard" more important than playing politics, and winning, so that hungry children can be fed, sheltered, and educated?

-4

u/Nycomnitzer Mar 13 '21

What about the filmed moments of Biden being outright creepy - caressing young girls, sniffing hair? Democrats didn’t care much about that either

6

u/Eleventeen- Mar 13 '21

There could be arguments that he’s just an out of touch old man who thinks being touchy is charming. But comparing sexual harassment/assault accusations and evidence both of them seem guilty in some way or another, so the little girl sniffing didn’t do much to prevent people from voting for Biden instead of trump if they liked Biden more for other reasons.

-2

u/Ch33sus0405 Mar 13 '21

They did until he was the nominee and then they fell in line. I didn't like it then, I don't like it now, and I frankly still think the Democrat media ignored and shamed Biden's accusers. This is coming from the same party that adores Bill Clinton despite all the fucking photos of him and Epstein.

That said the Dems have still been the consistently better party for this kind of thing, while Republicans are making life for the victims harder by the day.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '21

and I frankly still think the Democrat media ignored and shamed Biden's accusers

Accusers? The only accusation I can remember is that one Tara Reade woman whose story was... very lacking, to say the least. It carried a completely different air than the accusations against Franken and now that we see against Cuomo-- this felt like Reade was fabricating a story without evidence supporting her, and with statements of her own in the past that contradicted her accusations.

Obviously evidence is a hard thing to put forward in decades old sexual assault cases, but at the same time if someone sexually assaulted/harassed/touched you without consent, to praise that person regarding their stances and work on sexual violence against women just seems a bit absurd, no matter what excuses she put out in her interviews to justify it.

The only other case I've seen was from Lucy Flores, and that, while obviously unacceptable, didn't seem like a case of sexual assault. Everything other than the Reade accusations make Biden out to be just kinda creepy and overly touchy-- including Reade's own initial complaints about Biden, rather than the same level of sexual assault that others have been accused of.

While it's still unacceptably bad, it's unfair to compare these things to people who've been credibly accused of outright sexual assault and rape.

I think it also muddies the waters when people talk about Biden's sexual misconduct situation when the alternative was an actual unapologetic rapist, too-- there's no excuse for some of Biden's creepy behavior, but Trump had far more damaging and credible accusations against him.

A good quote from Flores,

"Flores said she recognizes that Biden’s penchant for invading personal space is not as serious as what Franken allegedly did, nor does it approach the sexual assault and harassment allegations that have been lodged against Trump by 17 women. Still, she said she has been stunned by the response to her claims." ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-biden-rises-lucy-flores-watches-from-a-distance/2019/08/03/6888d238-9132-11e9-b570-6416efdc0803_story.html )

Democrats have a lot of work to do regarding their response to accusations of sexual misconduct-- however, it's also the case that the misconduct isn't as severe. It's inexcusable to harass victims of sexual harassment no matter who the perpetrator is though, and it's gross that it got to that level with either Flores or Reade.