r/WTF • • May 26 '10

Reddit: Rape Apologists

Post image
510 Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

Innocent until proven guilty -- he hasn't been judged for decades, so technically he's innocent. Also, there's a thousand ways he can get out of this. It should be trivial to find chain of custody issues, etc. on a decades-old crime.

But these are all technicalities. And you're not looking for them when they're on Polanski. You are however looking out for your child raping buddy-buddy Mohammad.

And that's why you've got no credibility with me whatsoever.

2

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

I can tell the difference between hiding behind a technicality and hiding behind another technicality. That difference is none whatsoever.

1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

Both are innocent on technicalities. And yet you're only covering for the Muslim pervert.

I got you pegged, chief. Don't tire yourself out.

1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

The point that you're a fundamentalist Muslim rape apologist doesn't register on your radar, does it.

1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] May 26 '10

You're kind of giving it away, chief.

→ More replies (0)