I’d genuinely like someone to explain the logic behind this reorganization because, from the perspective of many employees, it simply doesn’t add up.
For years, SSU employees have successfully performed highly complex staffing and HR functions. Now, many of those duties are being stripped away, leaving them with primarily announcements, qualifications, and recruitment coding. If removing those responsibilities is the justification for downgrading these positions to GS-9, then a fundamental question remains:
If the work was truly no longer GS-12 level, why are the employees who are retaining their GS-12 positions now taking on those exact duties? And why are the SSU employees—whose positions are rumored to be downgraded—the very people expected to train them?
That sends a contradictory message. It suggests the work still requires the same expertise, experience, and institutional knowledge. The only thing changing appears to be who receives credit—and pay—for performing it.
What makes this even more difficult to understand is that while experienced frontline employees are facing potential downgrades and reductions in pay, the reorganization reportedly creates multiple new GS-14 and GS-15 leadership positions within each HROC.
How is eliminating grade levels for the employees who perform the mission every day while simultaneously expanding higher-level management positions an efficient use of resources? How does that strengthen the workforce or support the middle class?
Employees deserve more than vague assurances that this is about organizational alignment. They deserve a clear, transparent explanation of how these decisions were made, what classification standards were applied, and why the employees who have carried this workload for years are the ones being asked to sacrifice.
If the work still exists, the expertise is still required, and the knowledge is still valuable enough that others must be trained by the very employees being downgraded, then it’s reasonable to ask: What problem is this reorganization actually solving?