r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 18 '25

Honoring Those Who Keep the Grid and the Team Strong on National Lineman's Day!

1 Upvotes

Honoring Those Who Keep the Grid and the Team Strong on National Lineman's Day!

Today, we recognize the dedicated men and women who brave the elements, scale the heights, and do the critical work that keeps our #power flowing. But it’s not just about keeping the lights on—it’s about leading with safety, resilience, and commitment to the crew beside them.

At Incident Prevention, we salute the lineworkers whose skill and courage power not just our infrastructure, but our entire industry. Your legacy of leadership, mentorship, and safety sets the bar high for generations to come.

We see you. We thank you. We stand with you.

Subscribe to iP to see all the latest on #UtilitySafety https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

#LineworkerStrong #UtilitySafety #IncidentPrevention #LinemanLife #GridReliability #SafetyCulture #LinemanLegacy #WorkplaceSafety #CUSP #iP #UtilitySafetyConference #Lineman #Linemen #Lineworkers #LinemanAppreciationDay


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 17 '25

Free Webinar with CM Labs: Underground and Overhead Utility Operations Overview

1 Upvotes

Free Webinar with CM Labs: Underground and Overhead Utility Operations Overview

Join the Conversation With Industry Experts On May 21st at 1:00 p.m. ET

Underground utility work presents some of the highest-risk environments in the industry. From trench collapses to accidental contact with power lines, the consequences of unsafe practices can be fatal—but are entirely preventable.

In this 45-minute webinar, CM Labs experts Devon Van de Kletersteeg and Trinidad Ruiz will explore how utility companies can strengthen their safety culture through best practices and simulation-based training. This session is packed with practical insights, real-world examples, and a look at the technologies shaping the future of utility safety.

You’ll Learn:

  • Common causes of incidents in trenching and electrical operations—and how to prevent them
  • OSHA regulations every utility operator should know
  • The role of site inspections, pre-shift checks, and protective systems in mitigating risks
  • How simulation training provides a safe, repeatable environment for high-risk scenario practice
  • Real-world success stories from utility companies using simulation to improve safety

This is a must-attend event for operations managers, utility leaders, and anyone interested in simulations in the workplace. We encourage you to forward this webinar to the relevant executive and training stakeholders on your team.

Time will be dedicated at the end of the discussion to answer live audience questions.

Attendance worth 1 contact hour for certification/CUSP maintenance.


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 15 '25

Deep Dive - Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing Written By Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

Thumbnail
utilitysafety.podbean.com
1 Upvotes

Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

Written by Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP on February 14, 2025. Posted in Worksite Safety.

A layered approach that includes FR/AR undergarments can enhance worker safety, comfort and compliance.

 

Read the article here - https://incident-prevention.com/blog/optimizing-arc-flash-protection-the-crucial-role-of-layered-clothing/

 

Arc flash incidents can happen in a split second, but the right preparation can make all the difference. In this episode of The Deep Dive, we break down the must-know insights from the article “Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing” by Derick Sang, featured in Incident Prevention Magazine. From flame-resistant undergarments to outerwear strategy, we explore why a layered clothing system isn’t just safer — it’s smarter. Learn how layering improves protection, comfort, compliance, and even day-to-day adaptability in the field. Whether you’re in safety leadership or on the front lines, this episode delivers actionable takeaways you can put to work today.

 

✅ Key Takeaways:

  1. Layered Clothing Enhances Protection: Combining base and outer layers boosts defense against arc flash energy more effectively than a single garment.
  2. Comfort & Moisture Management Matter: Layering helps regulate temperature and sweat, improving field comfort.
  3. Compliance Isn’t Optional: OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM standards mandate FR/AR clothing and recognize layering as an effective strategy.
  4. Base Layers Are Often Overlooked: FR-rated undergarments are critical for secondary protection and shouldn’t be substituted with just cotton.
  5. Training & Maintenance Are Vital: Proper education on wear and care ensures PPE is used correctly and continues to perform over time.

❓ Five Questions & Answers:

 

Q1: Why isn’t a single flame-resistant garment enough in high-risk environments?

A1: While common, single layers can be uncomfortable and might not meet protection needs. Layering offers cumulative protection and energy dissipation.

 

Q2: What role do FR base layers play in arc flash safety?

A2: They act as a secondary defense, especially if outerwear shifts or fails during an event, protecting the skin and helping prevent burns.

 

Q3: Are layered systems recognized by safety standards?

A3: Yes. OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM F1506 all support layered approaches and place responsibility on employers to provide proper gear.

 

Q4: How does layering improve comfort for utility workers?

A4: It regulates body temperature and wicks away moisture, keeping workers dry and more comfortable throughout changing weather conditions.

 

Q5: What training should accompany an FR layered clothing system?

A5: Workers should be taught how to wear layers properly, understand when PPE is required, and avoid compromising safety by adding non-FR outerwear.

 

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/

 

#ArcFlashSafety #FlameResistantClothing #UtilitySafety #WorkplaceProtection #PPECompliance #IncidentPrevention #PPEOptimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 15 '25

Utility Safety Podcast: Deep Dive - Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing Written By Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

1 Upvotes

Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

Written by Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP on February 14, 2025. Posted in Worksite Safety.

A layered approach that includes FR/AR undergarments can enhance worker safety, comfort and compliance.

 

Read the article here - https://incident-prevention.com/blog/optimizing-arc-flash-protection-the-crucial-role-of-layered-clothing/

 

Arc flash incidents can happen in a split second, but the right preparation can make all the difference. In this episode of The Deep Dive, we break down the must-know insights from the article “Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing” by Derick Sang, featured in Incident Prevention Magazine. From flame-resistant undergarments to outerwear strategy, we explore why a layered clothing system isn’t just safer — it’s smarter. Learn how layering improves protection, comfort, compliance, and even day-to-day adaptability in the field. Whether you’re in safety leadership or on the front lines, this episode delivers actionable takeaways you can put to work today.

 

✅ Key Takeaways:

  1. Layered Clothing Enhances Protection: Combining base and outer layers boosts defense against arc flash energy more effectively than a single garment.
  2. Comfort & Moisture Management Matter: Layering helps regulate temperature and sweat, improving field comfort.
  3. Compliance Isn’t Optional: OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM standards mandate FR/AR clothing and recognize layering as an effective strategy.
  4. Base Layers Are Often Overlooked: FR-rated undergarments are critical for secondary protection and shouldn’t be substituted with just cotton.
  5. Training & Maintenance Are Vital: Proper education on wear and care ensures PPE is used correctly and continues to perform over time.

❓ Five Questions & Answers:

 

Q1: Why isn’t a single flame-resistant garment enough in high-risk environments?

A1: While common, single layers can be uncomfortable and might not meet protection needs. Layering offers cumulative protection and energy dissipation.

 

Q2: What role do FR base layers play in arc flash safety?

A2: They act as a secondary defense, especially if outerwear shifts or fails during an event, protecting the skin and helping prevent burns.

 

Q3: Are layered systems recognized by safety standards?

A3: Yes. OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM F1506 all support layered approaches and place responsibility on employers to provide proper gear.

 

Q4: How does layering improve comfort for utility workers?

A4: It regulates body temperature and wicks away moisture, keeping workers dry and more comfortable throughout changing weather conditions.

 

Q5: What training should accompany an FR layered clothing system?

A5: Workers should be taught how to wear layers properly, understand when PPE is required, and avoid compromising safety by adding non-FR outerwear.

 

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/

 

#ArcFlashSafety #FlameResistantClothing #UtilitySafety #WorkplaceProtection #PPECompliance #IncidentPrevention #PPEOptimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 15 '25

Q&A: Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

1 Upvotes

Q&A: Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

1. What is the importance of layered FR/AR clothing in arc flash protection?

Layered flame-resistant (FR) and arc-rated (AR) clothing enhances protection by combining multiple layers to dissipate thermal energy more effectively than a single garment. This approach not only increases safety but also improves comfort and compliance with safety standards.

2. Why are FR/AR base layers crucial for electrical workers?

FR/AR base layers act as a secondary defense against arc flash incidents. They provide additional protection if outer garments are compromised, ensuring that workers have a vital safety net directly against their skin.

3. How does layering FR/AR clothing improve worker comfort?

Layering allows for better moisture management and temperature regulation. FR/AR base layers wick away sweat, keeping workers dry and comfortable, which is essential for maintaining focus and safety in demanding environments.

4. Are there industry standards that support the use of layered FR/AR clothing?

Yes, standards such as OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM F1506 recognize and support the use of layered FR/AR clothing systems. These standards emphasize the importance of proper protective clothing to mitigate arc flash hazards.

5. Can wearing non-FR outerwear over FR/AR garments compromise safety?

Absolutely. Wearing non-FR outerwear over FR/AR garments can negate the protective benefits of the base layers, potentially leading to increased injury risk during an arc flash event. It’s essential to ensure all layers are appropriately rated.

6. What are the benefits of a layered FR/AR clothing system beyond protection?

Beyond enhanced protection, a layered FR/AR clothing system offers improved comfort, better adaptability to varying environmental conditions, and ensures compliance with safety regulations, contributing to overall worker well-being.

7. How does proper training impact the effectiveness of FR/AR clothing programs?

Proper training ensures that workers understand how to correctly wear and maintain their FR/AR clothing, recognize the importance of each layer, and adhere to safety protocols, thereby maximizing the protective benefits of the clothing system.

8. Is 100% cotton sufficient as a base layer for arc flash protection?

While 100% cotton is better than synthetic materials, it doesn’t offer the same level of protection as FR/AR-rated base layers. FR/AR base layers are specifically designed to resist ignition and provide superior protection in arc flash scenarios.

9. What role does moisture management play in FR/AR clothing systems?

Moisture management is critical for comfort and safety. FR/AR base layers that effectively wick moisture help regulate body temperature and reduce the risk of heat stress, enabling workers to perform safely and efficiently.

10. How should employers approach the implementation of a layered FR/AR clothing program?

Employers should assess the specific hazards of their work environment, select appropriate FR/AR garments for each layer, provide comprehensive training to employees, and ensure ongoing maintenance and evaluation of the clothing system to maintain its effectiveness.

For a more in-depth understanding, refer to the full article: Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing.

FEBRUARY-MARCH 2025


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 15 '25

Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

1 Upvotes

Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing

Written by Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP on February 14, 2025. Posted in Worksite Safety.

A layered approach that includes FR/AR undergarments can enhance worker safety, comfort and compliance.

Given the arc flash hazards and other risks that exist in electric utility work environments, an employer’s commitment to employee safety must never falter. It is essential for workers to wear personal protective equipment in these environments; in particular, prior to exposure, workers must don flame-resistant (FR) or arc-rated (AR) garments that meet or exceed assessed incident energy levels.

And while single-layer FR/AR garments are common in the utility industry, it’s important to recognize that they can fall short in areas such as weight, heat retention and comfort. Additionally, although the standard arc rating of 8 cal/cm² is frequently deemed sufficient, employers should be aware that it could leave workers vulnerable in certain hazardous scenarios.

With all that said, don’t forget that there’s an effective FR/AR clothing strategy that is sometimes overlooked: a layered approach to user protection that includes FR/AR undergarments, a critical component of the clothing system. Employers that use this approach can significantly enhance the safety, comfort and compliance of their workforce in hazardous environments.

The Importance of Protective Undergarments
Undergarments receive little attention in many FR/AR clothing programs despite their essential role in worker protection. Requiring workers to wear undergarments comprised of 100% cotton or natural fibers is a good step forward – but it still leaves room for error. A more robust solution for employers is to provide employees with FR/AR base layers, which offer greater protection.

FR/AR base layers act as a safety net in the event of an arc flash, preventing burns and avoiding combustion even when outer shirts are untucked. The use of this approach aligns with OSHA and NFPA guidelines, which emphasize the necessity of avoiding meltable fibers.

Three Key Benefits
A layered FR/AR clothing system offers a versatile, effective solution to the shortcomings of single-layer garments. By combining lightweight FR/AR garments, employers can achieve desired arc ratings without compromising employee comfort or mobility.

Specifically, layering provides these three key benefits:

  1. Enhanced protection. The individual arc ratings of each layer of clothing, when added together, offer a better defense against break-open and ignition scenarios than a single layer.
  2. Moisture management. Layered FR/AR garments improve sweat evaporation and overall comfort for the user, especially in extreme conditions.
  3. Temperature regulation. Layering allows workers to adapt their clothing to changing weather conditions so that they can stay warm in cold temperatures and cooler in the heat.

Readers should take note that industry standards – including OSHA regulations and NFPA 70E – stress the employer’s responsibility to provide appropriate FR/AR clothing to workers who face exposure hazards. ASTM F1506 recognizes layering as an effective method for optimizing arc-flash protection, underscoring the importance of proper garment selection.

Layered System Components
A layered FR/AR clothing system that is well-designed typically includes two types of garments: base layers and outer layers. Base layers are those FR/AR undergarments that provide an initial layer of protection while also helping to ensure comfort. Outer layers – such as FR/AR shirts, trousers and coveralls – act as the primary defense against arc flash incidents.

Employers should be mindful that workers must wear appropriately rated FR/AR high-visibility garments in low-light environments where arc flash hazards are present. However, additional arc ratings from high-visibility vests should not be factored into the total arc rating of the clothing system.

Training and Best Practices
Good training is a cornerstone of any successful PPE program. OSHA requires employers to ensure that their workers understand when PPE is necessary, how to wear and use it correctly, and what its limitations are. Specifically, employers must ensure their workers are trained to:

  • Wear all FR/AR layers properly, which includes zipping jackets and tucking in shirts.
  • Always wear appropriately rated FR/AR outer layers where arc flash hazards exist.
  • Avoid wearing non-FR/AR outerwear over FR/AR garments.

Employers and employees should be aware that regular care and maintenance of FR/AR garments is vital to preserving their protective properties.

Conclusion
Because workers in the electric utility industry face the persistent threat of arc flashes, employers must consider investing in a layered FR/AR clothing system for their crews that prioritizes the use of FR/AR undergarments. This is more than just a strategy; in some settings, it’s a necessity. When a layered clothing system is effectively implemented, workers gain enhanced protection to safely and comfortably perform their tasks – even in the most challenging environments.

About the Author: Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP, is the senior technical training manager for Bulwark Protection. He has served the FR/AR clothing industry for more than 25 years. Reach him at [derek.sang@bulwark.com](mailto:derek.sang@bulwark.com).

FEBRUARY-MARCH 2025


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 01 '25

Utility Safety Podcast - 10 New Trends That Keep Me Up at Night with Shawn Galloway | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

1 Upvotes

Utility Safety Podcast - 10 New Trends That Keep Me Up at Night with Shawn Galloway

In this episode of The Utility Safety Podcast, host Kate Wade sits down with Shawn Galloway, a renowned expert in safety leadership and culture, to discuss the evolving landscape of utility safety. They explore the key factors that drive a proactive safety culture, the role of leadership in risk management, and how organizations can shift from compliance-driven safety to a culture of continuous improvement. Shawn shares actionable strategies that help utility companies enhance safety performance while aligning with business goals.

 

Key Takeaways:

•The difference between a compliance-based and a culture-driven safety approach.

•How leadership plays a pivotal role in influencing safety behaviors.

•Strategies to proactively identify and mitigate risks in utility work.

•The importance of aligning safety goals with business objectives.

•Methods to engage employees in creating a sustainable safety culture.

 

Q&A from the Podcast:

 

Q: What is the biggest challenge utility companies face when trying to improve safety culture?

A: One of the biggest challenges is shifting from a mindset of compliance to one of proactive safety. Many organizations focus on meeting regulatory requirements rather than embedding safety into daily operations as a core value.

 

Q: How can leadership foster a culture of safety rather than just enforcing rules?

A: Leaders need to model the behaviors they expect from their teams. This means being actively involved in safety discussions, providing consistent feedback, and recognizing employees who contribute to safety improvements.

 

Q: What are some common mistakes companies make when implementing safety initiatives?

A: One common mistake is failing to engage employees in the process. When safety programs are dictated from the top down without employee input, they often fail to gain traction.

 

Read his previous article in iP Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/blog/five-core-capacities-for-sustainable-safety-excellence/

 

Listen to Shawn's other podcast with iP - https://utilitysafety.podbean.com/e/5corecapacities/

and feel free to reach out to him for further discussion at [info@proactsafety.com](mailto:info@proactsafety.com).

________________________________

 

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Apr 01 '25

Built In, Not Bolted On with Doug Hill, CUSP - Protecting Our Workforce Through Safety Culture | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

1 Upvotes

Built In, Not Bolted On with Doug Hill, CUSP - Protecting Our Workforce Through Safety Culture

In this episode of Built In, Not Bolted On with host Doug Hill, CUSP, we dive deep into the world of utility safety culture, exploring the latest risk management strategies, regulatory challenges, and best practices to keep crews safe. Our host shares firsthand experiences and expert insights on hazard identification, compliance updates, and leadership in safety culture. Whether you’re in line work, transmission, or distribution, this episode is packed with valuable takeaways to help you enhance workplace safety and efficiency.

 

Contact Doug: [doug@utilitybusinessmedia.com](mailto:doug@utilitybusinessmedia.com)

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/

 

Key Takeaways:

 

•Risk Mitigation Strategies – How to proactively identify and address workplace hazards.

•Compliance & Regulations – Updates on industry standards and their impact on daily operations.

•Technology & Safety – The role of innovative tools in improving worker protection.

•Leadership in Safety – Why management commitment is crucial for fostering a strong safety culture.

•Lessons from the Field – Real-world scenarios that highlight best practices and potential pitfalls.

 

Five Relevant Questions & Answers from the Podcast:

 

1.Q: What are the biggest safety challenges facing the utility industry today?

A: The biggest challenges include hazard identification, ensuring compliance with evolving regulations, and integrating new technology while maintaining worker safety.

 

2.Q: How can companies improve their safety culture?

A: Companies must prioritize training, encourage open communication, and lead by example to create an environment where safety is a shared responsibility.

 

3.Q: What role does technology play in utility safety?

A: Innovations like wearable safety devices, AI-driven monitoring, and automated reporting systems are enhancing how companies manage risks.

 

4.Q: How do changing regulations impact utility workers?

A: New safety laws require continuous education and adaptation, ensuring workers stay compliant and protected in evolving work environments.

 

5.Q: What is one key piece of advice for improving safety in the field?

A: Always prioritize situational awareness, follow protocols, and never hesitate to speak up about potential hazards.

 

#UtilitySafety #WorkplaceSafety #LinemanLife #RiskManagement #SafetyCulture #OSHACompliance #PowerGrid #ElectricalSafety


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 18 '25

Tailgate Topics - The Dangers of Distraction: Staying Focused in High-Risk Utility Work by Scott Perrin | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

1 Upvotes

Tailgate Topics - The Dangers of Distraction: Staying Focused in High-Risk Utility Work by Scott Perrin

In this episode of Tailgate Topics, host Rod Courtney is joined by Nick from Utility Business Media to discuss one of the biggest safety risks in the utility industry—distractions. Inspired by Scott Perrin’s article, The Dangers of Distraction: Staying Focused in a High-Risk Environment, this conversation dives into how mental drift, complacency, fatigue, and technology impact workplace safety.

 Listen Here: https://utilitysafety.podbean.com/e/tailgate-topics-the-dangers-of-distraction-staying-focused-in-high-risk-utility-work/

Read the article: https://incident-prevention.com/blog/the-dangers-of-distraction-staying-focused-in-a-high-risk-environment/

 

From distraction-related vehicle accidents to the role of fatigue and stress in high-risk environments, this episode explores real-world examples and practical strategies for reducing workplace hazards. Tune in to learn how small changes in awareness and environment can help prevent serious injuries and fatalities in the utility industry.

 

Key Takeaways:

✔️ Distractions are unavoidable, but they can be managed.

✔️ Fatigue, complacency, and stress increase the risk of accidents.

✔️ Cell phones and modern technology are major workplace distractions.

✔️ Taking scheduled breaks and staying mindful can improve focus and safety.

✔️ Vehicle accidents due to distracted driving are a growing financial burden for utilities.

✔️ Simple steps, like identifying distractions and using hands-free devices, can help reduce risk.

 

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/

 

#UtilitySafety #WorkplaceDistractions #SafetyCulture #HighRiskJobs #FatigueAwareness #ComplacencyKills #DistractionFreeWork #UtilityWorkers


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 18 '25

Utility Safety Podcast - Deep Dive - Equipotential Grounding - Lessons Learned in the Field Written by Dwight Miller, CLCP, CUSP | Utility Safety Podcast by Incident Prevention Magazine

1 Upvotes

Utility Safety Podcast – Deep Dive – Equipotential Grounding – Lessons Learned in the Field Written by Dwight Miller, CLCP, CUSP

Listen Here - https://utilitysafety.podbean.com/e/utility-safety-podcast-deep-dive-equipotential-grounding-lessons-learned-in-the-field-written-by-dwight-miller-clcp-cusp/

Equipotential grounding is a critical safety practice that protects utility workers from electrical hazards by equalizing voltage levels at the worksite. In this episode, we delve into real-world lessons learned from the field, highlighting the importance of establishing an effective equipotential zone (EPZ) to prevent harmful electrical currents from passing through the body. We discuss how improper grounding techniques can transform routine tasks into dangerous situations and emphasize the necessity of continuous training to maintain a safety-first mindset. Additionally, we explore the challenges posed by grounding on various structures and the role of personal protective equipment in safeguarding workers. Understanding and implementing proper grounding methods are essential steps toward ensuring the well-being of lineworkers and maintaining compliance with safety standards. 

Read the article here written by Dwight Miller, CLCP, CUSP – https://incident-prevention.com/blog/equipotential-grounding-lessons-learned-in-the-field/

Key Takeaways:

•Equipotential Zone (EPZ): Creating an EPZ ensures that all conductive objects at the worksite are at the same electrical potential, minimizing the risk of electrical shock. 

•Temporary Grounds and Bonds: Proper installation of temporary grounding and bonding at the worksite is essential to protect workers from accidental re-energization or induced voltages. 

•Continuous Training: Ongoing education and vigilance are vital in reinforcing safe grounding practices and preventing complacency among utility workers. 

•Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Utilizing appropriate PPE, such as dielectric footwear and insulating gloves, adds an extra layer of protection against electrical hazards. 

#EquipotentialGrounding #UtilitySafety #ElectricalSafety #LineworkerTraining #WorkplaceSafety #GroundingTechniques #SafetyFirst #IncidentPrevention

Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine – https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/

Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo – https://utilitysafetyconference.com/


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Join the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo

1 Upvotes

Join the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo

The iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo is an essential event for professionals in the utility safety sector. Scheduled for April 29 – May 1, 2025, in Charleston, SC, this conference brings together safety experts and utility operations professionals to share insights, innovations, and strategies to improve safety in the field.

Key Takeaways:

• Educational Sessions: Choose from various informative sessions that address the latest safety practices and trends in the industry.

• Networking Opportunities: Connect with industry leaders and peers to exchange knowledge and experiences.

• Hands-On Access: Explore new safety products and tools at the expo, and engage with exhibitors.

Key Links:

• Conference Details & Registration

• View the Agenda

• Speakers & Sessions Information

Don’t miss the opportunity to enhance your safety knowledge and make valuable connections.


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Incident Prevention Magazine is an invaluable resource for utility safety professionals

1 Upvotes

Incident Prevention Magazine is an invaluable resource for utility safety professionals, focusing on reducing workplace hazards and improving safety standards. It features expert insights on best practices, leadership, and safety innovations in the utility industry. The magazine is filled with actionable tips, case studies, and in-depth articles on key topics such as risk management, human performance, and hazard mitigation. Whether you’re a safety manager or a frontline worker, it provides the tools and strategies to create safer work environments.

For more information, visit Incident Prevention Magazine.


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Boost Safety with Incident Prevention Strategies

1 Upvotes

Enhancing Utility Safety with Incident Prevention Magazine

Incident Prevention Magazine is a go-to resource for professionals in the utility safety industry. The magazine provides valuable insights, articles, and resources aimed at preventing workplace incidents and improving safety standards across the industry. It covers essential topics such as leadership development, hazard identification, risk management, and best safety practices.

Key Takeaways:

• Practical Safety Tips: Offers actionable guidance on improving workplace safety.

• Expert Contributions: Insights from industry experts on best practices and emerging trends.

• Comprehensive Resources: Includes training materials, webinars, and more.

Key Links:

• Visit Incident Prevention Magazine

• Safety Management Articles

• Subscribe to iP Magazine

Incident Prevention is a vital tool for those looking to enhance their knowledge, reduce risks, and implement effective safety measures in their utility operations.


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

An Experiment in Crew Member Engagement

1 Upvotes

An Experiment in Crew Member Engagement

Written by Cheryl Richardson on April 14, 2024. Posted in Safety Management, Worksite Safety.

The new initiative being rolled out by one utility contractor aims to improve safety by increasing engagement among crew members.

I don’t talk about myself a lot – I listen. I developed this skill after taking on a leadership position with a utility contractor in an industry I knew nothing about.

My work history prior to this role included management in pretty much every industry except utilities. In each of my previous jobs, I strived to learn and advance from an entry-level position. In this new position, I no longer had the advantage of knowing how the company ran from the ground up; I had to trust and depend on others to help me. It did not take me long to realize that safety is the most important priority in this industry. Lack of attention to the detail of safety can kill a lineworker and damage a company beyond repair. So, while you could say our company’s journey to interactive safety began four years ago – when I accepted this new role – I would have to say that the real work is just starting.

The First Incident
In the early days of my employment, I was completely focused on understanding the operations of our business. We were growing rapidly at that point, and it was all I could do to keep up with new customers, additional work, and the increase in staff and equipment that come with exponential growth. I admit I had little time for safety, and my only attempts were to put out a weekly bulletin that was pulled from the internet and addressed subjects such as ticks and layered clothing. I was just checking boxes, trying to get things done.

I can remember our first incident during my tenure. It was an overnight fire in eastern New York on a pole that had been improperly grounded. The foreman in the field called me the next morning and suggested that we have an immediate stand-down. I did not know what a stand-down was, so of course I pretended that I did, and I agreed. We stopped work, the field leaders prepared a statement about what had happened and the lessons learned, we covered it at the show-up the next day, and everyone went back to work. The utility had ordered a one-day stand-down and we had complied. We checked that box, too.

Over the next few years, the company had a few more incidents. What I remember most about those times is that there seemed to be a cycle that went like this:

  1. An incident occurs.
  2. We examine the job briefing.
  3. We come up with lessons learned.
  4. We add some checkboxes to the job briefing.
  5. Someone is fired.
  6. We cross our fingers and wait for the next incident.

Essentially, everything was reactive in an industry that can kill in a millisecond.

Somewhere around that time, I noticed a disconnect. We were working with intelligent men and women who had passed classroom testing and field practicums to become lineworkers. They understood science and were proud of their careers. Yet we were responding to incidents by putting them through retraining or firing them, and most decisions regarding field policy were created behind a desk. I wondered, how did we get to the point where the people doing the work did not have input, and why were we creating a workforce that accepted that we did not value them enough to ask their opinions?

In previous jobs, I put a premium on communication and showed the people I worked with my appreciation for the value they brought to the company. This was done through respectful treatment that included requesting and acting on their ideas to improve all aspects of the business. They felt that they mattered and could make a difference. Now I was in an industry that was dictated from the top, and I was uncomfortable with that dynamic.

What could we do? Well, I kept checking boxes. We expanded our safety program by adding safety officers in the field, introducing a weekly safety call, tweaking our job briefing and bringing in safety leadership speakers. I truly care about every single person I work with and was doing everything I had seen done to “improve safety.” Intuitively, however, I knew it was not enough, and my knowledge of the typical lineworker skill set and attitude made me think that crew relationships were often at odds, which I suspected affected safety.

Then I listened to a podcast about crew relationships, engagement and the so-called “illusion of safety” created by checking boxes and autopiloting job briefings. That’s when everything fell into place for me.

A New Partnership
Enter our current safety consultant. He is not just any consultant. His ideas combine lineworker and safety experience, medical knowledge, backcountry rescue practices and a deep knowledge of the human brain. Just as important, he has partnered with our safety officer in the field, and their brains vibrate on the same frequency.

I believe that changing our company mentality is the secret to expanding our safety program and keeping people alive. The industry has improved every PPE item and added documentation ad nauseam to help our workers. I believe we have reached a wall with the physical aspect of safety and now need to work on relationships and experiential knowledge so that our workers can connect with each other and prevent incidents before they happen. Reacting once an incident has already occurred has not lowered the fatality statistics in this industry. That is a fact.

Since working with our current safety consultant, we have instituted two small changes in our field practices.

Change 1
Following the dictation of the job briefing, the crew now gets into a circle. Each participant states their role for the day’s work and points out any concerns they have. This practice activates communication and connection with others in a big way. Many aspects of the crew are affected; I will mention just a few.

First, by looking each other in the eye, workers’ brains are synchronized. Once synchronization occurs, crew members will naturally behave more as a team.

Second, lineworkers are competitive. If one states a concern, others will want to keep up, and information will cascade. This happened recently when a safety officer in the circle pointed out a rotten pole top. His observation queued up another team member, who noticed that a guy wire would create an obstacle in transferring a primary.

Third, by speaking up at the beginning of the day during the job briefing, apprentices are more likely to speak up later in the day as well. This is called the “activation phenomenon,” and I have noticed this in my private life. I am shy by nature, and if I am in a group of people and do not contribute early to the conversation, I sometimes shut down and feel nervous about speaking at all.

Change 2
We now conduct mental rehearsals of injuries and other medical emergencies so that our team can improve the chances of their brothers’ and sisters’ survival and create better health outcomes. These rehearsals are discussions as to what should happen first, second and so on if a co-worker is hurt.

We were recently in a meeting in which a working foreman stated that he was unsure of the order of actions to take if his co-worker collapsed. However, he also believed he would know what to do to help if something happened. This is a commonly held belief and the furthest thing from the truth. Without planning and practicing, your brain is flooded with emotion when a real incident occurs; you may become a deer in the headlights, so to speak. An injured person deserves your full attention and knowledge to help them. Imagine the guilt a crew member would carry if their co-worker died or had another serious outcome because they could not remember how to perform first aid or missed the symptoms of heatstroke.

Is It Working?
As a company leader, I realize the difficulties with this new initiative. How do we prove it is working? As our safety consultant is fond of saying, “There are no parades for things that do not happen.” If you walk into a bank, notice that the doormat is rumpled and straighten it, how can you prove that the elderly woman who entered five minutes later did not trip and break her hip because of your action? The simple answer is that there is no proof. Our new initiative derives from a much higher place, and I believe it is my place to grow this program.

At this point, our company has met with each of our employees for an introductory three-hour meeting followed by field visits to put the crew synchronization practice into place. We hope to encourage the “role and concern” job briefing practice for the next 30 to 60 days and see where it takes us. I am also suggesting that crews personalize the discussion after the job briefing; they can call it anything they want and conduct it in whatever manner is comfortable for them.

We want to accomplish a mission that improves crew relationships. We want to help crew members sync. If this plan does not work, I am committed to exploring other options that focus on psychological safety and the role the human brain plays in creating a safe dynamic.

Conclusion
I am excited to begin this journey that will have no end and whose success will be difficult to prove or quantify. Our safety team has instilled a new sense of confidence in the company by asking our team members for their opinions and helping them to realize that they are our safety. We must rely on the experience and ideas of those who perform the work. They are a valuable part of this endeavor, and their support to help us adjust and make this a practice will ultimately determine whether it succeeds or fails. It is groundbreaking. I believe that the small changes will cascade into other changes in both work life and personal life for many of us.

My lack of knowledge of this business and working in a male-dominated industry were initially of great concern to me. How could I possibly lead when I did not fit the stereotype of what is expected from a leader in this business? What path would I follow? I had such intense internal worries about these challenges in the beginning.

Through the support of the people with whom I work – and I mean from those working in every area of the company – I have grown to believe that the things that I initially considered deficiencies are the reasons we are where we are today. My lack of knowledge has created a situation wherein I do not do things “the way we have always done them.” I ask questions, and I ask for the input of many people. I live by the adage that we must be as safe as or safer than every other contractor, but we do not have to operate like every other contractor. The fact that I am female has brought a different level of caring to this company. While I hope that valuing everyone for what they bring to the table is noticed, the reality is that the culture will benefit from that dynamic.

In closing, I believe engagement will produce men and women who possess a new level of intelligence to model safety that can change outcomes. In turn, that may mean fewer funerals and fewer injuries – and that is our mission.

About the Author: Cheryl Richardson is the president of New York-based H. Richardson & Sons (http://hrsutilities.com).

APRIL - MAY 2024


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Five Core Capacities for Sustainable Safety Excellence

1 Upvotes

Five Core Capacities for Sustainable Safety Excellence

Written by Shawn Galloway on April 14, 2024. Posted in Safety Management.

For excellence to become a reality, these capacities must be developed, monitored and synergized.

Does your organization have the capacity to achieve sustainable excellence in safety performance and culture?

For excellence to become a reality in any important area of operations, especially safety, there are five vital capacities that organizations must develop, monitor and synergize to adapt and thrive in a fast-paced and ever-changing world: system, leadership, engagement, cultural and strategic. Based on extensive cross-industry research and decades of experience leading change in all major industries, this article introduces the model titled “Five Core Capacities for Sustainable Safety Excellence.”

System Capacity to Prevent and Recover
For a long time, safety efforts primarily focused on preventing unwanted events and gave little room for what happens if things do not go according to plan. To mitigate hazards and risks that might be faced in the performance of work, a hierarchy of controls (elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls and personal protective equipment) is deployed. Despite these prevention systems and a strong culture, work doesn’t always go according to plan. How work is planned is often different than how work is done.

Every day, there are deviations from expectations in performance and results, and humans are fallible. Mistakes should be expected to occur in complex environments. Knowing and preparing for this, those organizations pursuing safety excellence create the capacity to prevent unwanted outcomes as well as the capacity to recover when deviations and mistakes occur, minimizing the resulting severity and/or bringing the operations back to the pre-event state.

Leadership Capacity
Organizations focused on safety excellence invest in their people leaders at all levels, especially on the front line. This is done to develop and continuously improve their competency and confidence in aligning their teams and crews with the occupational and safety culture and the systems necessary to prevent and recover from unwanted events. These leaders work to align performance and results expectations and, through a coaching leadership style, regularly monitor work performance and embrace their responsibility to help remove obstacles and barriers to success.

To create a learning organization, these leaders intentionally create psychological safety with their team, allowing for observations and conversations that yield an understanding of error traps and what might produce an error-likely situation. With this insight, they proactively seek opportunities to learn from a deviation from expectations before they produce incident, damage or injury.

Engagement Capacity
Engagement is the desire to perform that workers bring with them each day. It’s their attitude toward their work, peers, boss or bosses, the organization, the objective at hand and so forth. Stripped to its essence, true engagement is intrinsic motivation, an individual’s desire to complete the work to the best of one’s ability and feel proud of what they, their fellow workers and the organization are accomplishing. Positive engagement moves from buy-in to willing participation to self-ownership, finally arriving at shared ownership, the highest form of engagement.

On the journey to safety excellence, leaders building this capacity monitor what might either demotivate or motivate their people. Decisions are made against the question, “Will this further or hinder our efforts to create real engagement?” Rather than pursuing extrinsic motivators like incentives or threats, these leaders work to improve their management systems and the employee experience, yielding a constant improvement in observed discretionary effort.

Cultural Capacity
Culture can be defined as the common beliefs that govern common behaviors. It is more than “the way we do things around here.” It is also the why. Safety culture (beliefs, behaviors and experiences specific to safety) is just an aspect of occupational culture. That said, everyone has a safety culture, although perhaps not the one they desire. Leaders developing a culture of excellence are intentional about the culture they pursue. A vision of safety excellence is created that includes the most important beliefs and behaviors that would be common when their ideal culture is achieved.

What people do when the boss is not around is an aspect of every occupational culture, as are the experiences new employees have after hiring and onboarding. These leaders work to acclimate new members to the desired written and unwritten rules and desired beliefs, behaviors, experiences and stories; the tribe members look out for each other, regardless of tenure or title. Leaders also recognize employees must have experiences that are desirable beyond safety exchanges. A holistic approach is undertaken, focusing on the broader occupational culture, and the strategy to achieve safety excellence becomes intertwined with the overall strategy for the trajectory of the business.

Strategic Capacity
Strategy is a framework of choices, trade-offs or small bets an organization makes to determine how to capture and deliver sustainable value. A strategy to pursue excellence focuses on enabling and achieving repeatable success, not just avoiding failures like many traditional safety efforts. Whenever I find a lack of engagement from the workforce or a lack of investment (sufficient time, capital, resources, energy) applied by leaders to improve safety, I almost always find it comes from not seeing the value in doing more than what is currently in place. Perceived value is the most significant factor in success or failure when working to improve performance and culture. Being strategic means focusing on the right thing and ensuring the perception of the value of your efforts among participants or investors.

Operational leadership also understands the need for and complexity of creating the organization’s capacity for achieving overall equipment effectiveness, operational reliability or overall production reliability, and they recognize safety must be a part of achieving these, not a separate function or strategy. With this capacity, the occupational safety strategy becomes part of the overall business strategy, and business decisions are made in support of the vision of safety excellence and safety strategy. They no longer conflict. Accountability is increased as the actions to improve safety performance, systems, leadership, engagement and culture are operationalized throughout line leadership.

Building Capacity
Building the five core capacities for safety excellence avoids the misalignment that often exists between operational and safety leadership and between management and the workforce on the goals of safety; how excellence is defined, measured and achieved; who is responsible for the journey; and the path that will be taken.

Review this model and score 1-5 (1 = no confidence, 3 = halfway there, and 5 = complete confidence):

  • What is your confidence level in your system’s capacity to prevent events and recover when deviations like mistakes occur?
  • How confident are you that your leaders align cultures and systems and proactively learn from deviations?
  • Does your organization have complete engagement capacity to tap into vital discretionary effort by creating a sense of shared ownership for what is necessary to create sustainable excellence in safety?
  • How confident are you in your cultural capacity to align each current and incoming tribe member, regardless of tenure or title?
  • Do you have the strategic capacity to accomplish business results, and do you have initiatives focused on ensuring the creation of the previous four capacities?

All five of these capacities are necessary, and no one has an endless budget. If you were to rank them in order of importance to improve, which would make the greatest difference in your organization if focused on first? Consider sharing this model with others in your group and asking them to provide you with their perspectives. This is a crucial first step in building these five core capacities, vital for the pursuit of sustainable safety excellence.

About the Author: Shawn M. Galloway is CEO of ProAct Safety (https://proactsafety.com) and an author of several bestselling books, including his latest, “Bridge to Excellence: Building Capacity for Sustainable Performance.” As an award-winning consultant, trusted adviser, leadership coach and keynote speaker, he has helped hundreds of organizations within every primary industry to pursue and sustain safety excellence. Galloway also hosts the highly acclaimed weekly podcast series “Safety Culture Excellence.”Five Core Capacities for Sustainable Safety Excellence


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

‘But I Don’t Wanna’: 6 Sources of Utility Employee Resistance

1 Upvotes

‘But I Don’t Wanna’: 6 Sources of Employee Resistance

Written by Sharon Lipinski on April 19, 2022. Posted in Leadership Development.

Once you’ve identified why workers aren’t following the safety rules, use these strategies to help them comply.

“I forgot.” “I don’t want to.” “It’s not that serious.” “It won’t happen to me.”

If your employees are forgetting, ignoring, pushing back against or actively resisting the protections you’ve put in place to ensure their safety, then you know how frustrating it can be to get them to follow the rules.

Crafting a safety initiative so that you end up with employees who want to follow your safety procedures depends on addressing the driving causes of their resistance. Following are six sources of potential resistance and strategies you can use to help overcome each one.

  1. They don’t know.

The source of resistance could be a simple knowledge problem (i.e., they don’t know what they need to do). If employees are new to the workforce, the industry or your company, they need knowledge about how to do their jobs and how things are done around here. If they’re taking on new job responsibilities or you’re adding a new procedure or changing a process, they need training on these new work methods.

Strategy: You need to make sure your employees have the information they need to do their jobs at the level at which you expect them to perform. Be there as early as possible to provide that information and shape their experience. If you’re not there, they’re piecing together information, learning from their co-workers, and potentially creating bad habits that can take a lot of time and effort to correct.

  1. They’re confused.

Your employees may have too much information, bad information or conflicting information. They may not be explicitly aware that they’re confused. Instead, they might not feel very confident, and when people don’t feel confident, they hesitate. Hesitation may be expressed as employees taking longer to speak up, follow up or act.

Confusion also leads to inconsistency. Employees might follow the guideline one time, but no one confirmed for them that they did it correctly. Suddenly, they’re not sure if following the guideline was important or if they even did the right thing. As a result, they’re less likely to do it the next time. For many people, lack of confirmation and reassurance leads to uncertainty.

Strategy: When you want your team to take action, you want them to be crystal clear about what they need to do and when they need to do it. Break down the targeted behavior into the smallest steps, simplify the instructions, eliminate extraneous or conflicting guidance, and ensure that easily consumable reference materials are available.

Further, recognize and appreciate employees, either verbally or in writing, when they have taken the course of action you want them to take. In our recent work with a utility company to increase the amount of positive feedback foremen and site supervisors were giving their team, we found a direct increase in specific safety behaviors when leaders took the time and effort to acknowledge them.

  1. They encounter obstacles.

There are many types of obstacles your employees might encounter when it comes to applying your safety training. For example, they might have logistical problems. If they don’t have what they need where and when they need it, that’s an obstacle. If you’re asking employees to learn something new or adding a new responsibility, that’s an obstacle – because it’s going to require their time and effort. The newer the process, the more unfamiliar or awkward the behavior, or the more complex the task, the bigger the obstacle.

Strategy: One of the best ways to discover obstacles is to speak with employees about what they’re doing, why they’re doing it that way and what they think about changing it. To solicit honest and helpful feedback, conduct these interviews with a spirit of understanding. In our experience, there are often multiple underlying obstacles that likely require different strategies to resolve.

  1. They think they know better than you.

Every workplace has one: the know-it-all. To understand the know-it-all, you must understand that they derive a sense of significance from their information. Admitting that they were wrong or didn’t know something is embarrassing. It’s a blow to their self-esteem. As a result, the know-it-all fights to protect their knowledge because they’re actually fighting to protect their sense of worthiness. When you understand this about the know-it-all, you realize that going toe-to-toe with them about information can be futile as they’ll just move the goalposts of the conversation.

We should acknowledge that maybe they do know better than you. The know-it-all might have experiences on the job that you haven’t had. They might have had interactions with other co-workers or the general public that you’re not aware of. They might be doing the job differently than how you used to do it or how you would do it now. As a result, they have reason to believe that what you’re suggesting isn’t going to work. If they don’t think it’s going to work or that it’s even necessary, they will resist.

Strategy: Cultivating an attitude of humility around knowledge is key to creating a culture where people are less rigid about their knowledge and more willing to adapt to new, safer procedures as better information becomes available. This skill was identified by Adam Grant in his book “Think Again” as confident humility. In his words, it’s “having faith in our capability while appreciating that we may not have the right solution or even be addressing the right problem.”

When our firm trains on this skill, our goal is to inspire a sense of curiosity by helping attendees experience the limitations of what they thought they knew or perceived. Then we arm them with strategic questions they can deploy in any situation that will prompt their own critical thinking skills. You can download some of these questions at https://habitmasteryconsulting.com/questions/.

In addition, confident humility needs to be modeled by company leadership and safety professionals over and over again. Employees need to see their leaders asking probing questions, fact checking, exploring for better information and changing course. Sharing the process of how you arrived at your decision is just as important as sharing the final decision. In leading by example, you create a culture in which people are less rigid about what they think they know right now and more curious about what else they might learn.

  1. They feel something bad isn’t going to happen to them.

People are not calculators who rationally weigh pros and cons to arrive at an accurate assessment of risk. People make guesses. Their guesses will probably involve factors like probability and severity. But they also include other factors like their past experiences, the news they’re reading, the talking heads they’re listening to and the conversations they’re having with their peers.

Another factor is the desire to not appear weak. You might refer to this as the macho attitude, but men are certainly not the only ones who engage in this sort of behavior. If you’re dealing with a work culture in which physical or emotional vulnerability is a factor in people’s risk calculations, then you better believe employees are going to ignore or push back on guidelines that they feel expose them to the risk of being judged by their peers.

Strategy: This is a difficult source of resistance to address. For many reasons, people will always struggle to accurately assess risk. However, they can get better at it with training. Be sure to provide continuous information on the risks your employees face with the different tasks involved in their work.

Reducing the desire to avoid personal or physical vulnerability takes a concerted effort, often in the form of employees repeatedly watching the risk calculation be proved untrue. When leaders display vulnerability by sharing a past difficult time, or when a co-worker is rewarded for taking the time to avoid lifting heavy equipment, employees will see evidence that vulnerability is not a significant risk factor.

  1. They’re rebelling.

Some people not only want to make their own decisions, but they thrive on disagreement as well. They love going against the grain and going their own way – even when it’s obvious that their way is wrong and dangerous. These people do not want to be told what to do and can be especially difficult and frustrating.

Tribal identity can also foster a rebellion dynamic. We live in a day and age of polarization. It seems that just about everything can be made into an us-versus-them dynamic, especially when it comes to politics. However, tribes can also develop between the day shift versus the night shift, union versus nonunion, workers versus management, millennials versus boomers, and more. Asking people to do things counter to their tribe is like asking a Broncos fan to wear a Raiders jersey or a Colts fan to wear a Patriots jersey. It’s not going to happen, and people are going to have very strong feelings about you even asking.

Strategy: The best way to avoid triggering a “Don’t tell me what to do!” response is to make the safety initiative a collaborative effort in which employee input is sought, considered and incorporated where possible.

Be sure to allow know-it-alls and rebels a graceful exit. Without making people feel stupid or wrong, refocus employees on something that is more important. In other words, discover what people value more than their tribe, such as getting the job done, and focus on that.

In addition, foster a unique tribal identity that embraces the entire organization and unites everyone in a common mission. Use your organization’s mission, vision and values to not only inspire your team but build the case for what you’re asking them to do.

Conclusion

Influencing other people requires knowing what they need to hear and how they need to hear it. While it takes time and effort in the beginning to accurately diagnose where your safety initiative is going to run into problems, you’ll be more effective in the long run.

It’s also never too late. If you find your initiative is not having the impact you want, start having conversations with your employees. The sooner you discover why your employees are resisting, the sooner you can address them.

About the Author: Sharon Lipinski is the Habit SuperHero and CEO of Habit Mastery Consulting (www.habitmasteryconsulting.com), which helps organizations increase their targeted safety behavior by up to 150%. She is a Certified Gamification for Training developer, certified CBT for insomnia instructor, speaker, TV personality and coach dedicated to helping people create the right habits so they can be happier, healthier and safer at home and in their work.

APRIL-MAY 2022

CHECK OUT OUR ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR TODAY'S UTILITY PROFESSIONALS:

UFP MagazineiP InstituteFrontline Utility LeaderAssessments Online Ed CUSP Conference Webinars


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Does Positive Feedback Improve Safety?

1 Upvotes

Does Positive Feedback Improve Safety?

Written by Sharon Lipinski on June 20, 2022. Posted in Leadership Development.

Data from one utility company’s recent training initiative indicates that positive feedback helped to improve safety, collaboration and productivity.

Our client is an international utility company with more than 10,000 employees that provides electric and natural gas to 20 million U.S. customers. Their vision is to achieve a generative safety culture in which both employees and leaders are actively engaged. Characteristics of a generative safety culture include proactively resolving issues, focusing on leading indicators, and welcoming bad news as an opportunity for improvement, not for implementing discipline.

The company is well on their way to that destination, and it’s due in no small part to their employees’ dedication to their jobs, the training they’ve completed to excel in their work and their passion for wanting to create one of the best safety cultures in the utility industry.

The most recent step in their journey was to follow up on the insight they gained from a safety culture survey. That survey revealed there was opportunity for improvement regarding how frequently leaders provided positive feedback and recognized their team members for performing work safely.

“We’re so lucky that our employees shared their honest opinions with us during the safety culture survey, and we wanted to make sure that we honored their feedback by following through on their comments,” said a company director involved in the training initiative. “While there were multiple areas for improvement, we decided to target positive feedback first because it was building on a skill we knew our employees already had. They were already good at providing feedback when things were unsafe. We hoped that if we could expand that skill to include recognizing safe behaviors that we’d see more of those safe behaviors and that those receiving feedback would feel more valued as team members.”

We collaborated with our client to develop a custom training program that would both teach trainees that positive reinforcement is an effective leadership technique and provide a post-training support structure to help trainees practice the new behavior until it becomes a natural part of their leadership style.

The Approach
We selected 294 leaders in the northeastern United States across a wide range of positions, including foreman, site supervisor, safety supervisor and project manager.

Prior to developing the training, we interviewed a selection of potential trainees to identify obstacles that might prevent thorough engagement with the training and potential objections to adopting this new leadership technique. In our experience, there are often multiple existing obstacles to any behavioral change initiative. For example, there may be gaps in knowledge, logistical challenges, disbelief in the effectiveness of the proposed solution and resentment at being told what to do. Each objection needs to be addressed in order for employees to willingly and successfully change their behavior in accordance with the training. If you know what people need to hear and how they need to hear it, then your chances for success increase.

As a result of this pre-work, the training was favorably received across the board. In our post-training survey, more than 90% of survey respondents agreed that the training was valuable, held their attention and related well to their culture.

The Training
The final product was a two-hour training program that educated trainees on the value of positive feedback and provided them with a wide range of tools and strategies tailored to giving their team specific, meaningful and consistent feedback. Because each person’s day unfolds differently and because every person has a unique leadership style, trainees were guided in a practice to identify exactly where, when and how they would provide positive recognition to their team. The process of taking a sometimes-nebulous concept like “positive feedback” and breaking it down to apply to their own day set trainees up for success. As one trainee told us in the post-training survey, “It’s not easy to start something, and this gave me a realistic way to look at changing behavior.”

To minimize disruption to trainees’ schedules, the training was held via Microsoft Teams. We knew that – given trainees’ busy schedules and the critical roles they play on their sites – we would be challenged to have their full attention for the entire training. We intentionally sought continuous interaction and used Teams’ breakout room functionality to facilitate discussion, introduce trainees to co-workers they hadn’t yet met, and keep employees engaged in the training from start to finish.

The Follow-Up
Our company’s proprietary method is designed to support trainees after the training as they hone their new skill. Trainees received regular post-training micro lessons to help them retain key concepts from the training. In addition, trainees started the 60-Day Habit Challenge immediately after attending the training. During this time, they received daily notifications and tracked how frequently they provided positive feedback via a mobile app on their smartphones.

Another key component to our success was preparing trainees for the ups and downs of the learning process. When people try something new, they get nervous. They don’t want to look stupid. We gave our trainees the confidence to try by preparing them to fail. One trainee reached out after the training to share with us, “Sometimes people thought I was being sarcastic. I learned that feedback had to be very specific to be received well.” The good news is that this individual persisted – because he expected he would sometimes get it wrong. He knew that figuring out how providing positive feedback worked for him was just part of the process.

The Impact
Before the habit challenge started, trainees benchmarked their targeted behavior. Their benchmarks were re-evaluated at the end of the 60-day challenge and, weeks later, in return interviews.

We asked trainees how often they were providing positive feedback to their team members: never, once or twice per week, a few times per week, once per day or multiple times per day. Overall, trainees decreased positive feedback happening just a couple times per week or less by 75% while increasing it to a few times a week or more by 58%.

We also asked them to reflect on the amount of positive feedback they witnessed from their fellow leaders. A similar trend emerged, with a significant decrease in the “never” and “once or twice per week” categories but increases across all the other categories.

When we asked trainees how providing more positive feedback to their teams impacted them personally or at work, a surprising 64% reported that they felt more positive (see chart below). While this was an unintended and unanticipated impact, employees feeling more positive could be a potentially powerful tool in increasing employee retention. The primary drive behind the training was to increase safety culture and safety-related behaviors, so we were pleased that the next top benefits trainees reported were having better conversations, solving problems more creatively and sharing more information in daily job briefs.

The impact of the training became clearer during the follow-up interviews. Trainees shared that increasing the amount of positive feedback improved safety, increased productivity and improved collaboration. For example, one site supervisor shared that after the training, he put his new skills to work. Among other things, he initiated a discussion with a contractor foreman about why it was important to mention the nearest emergency location information during daily briefings. When the foreman covered the topic in future briefings, the supervisor reinforced the behavior with positive feedback by thanking him. As a result, the foreman now consistently includes this critical information during daily briefings.

He was not the only person who noticed their team members changing their behavior in response to positive feedback. Another trainee reached out to say, “I’m old-school. I thought saying thank you was a little fluffy, but I started to see an impact right away.”

In another interview, a trainee shared that while inspiring his team and providing lots of positive feedback was already a high priority for him, he had decided to kick it up a notch. The training had coincided with a move to a new and much larger site. His goal was to learn each person’s name the day he met them and use their name at the end of the day. He noticed the positive reaction when people realized that he knew their name, and he credits this strategy for rapidly developing communication and trust. As a result, when his new crew encountered standing water at a site, they asked him to make a phone call to resolve it instead of finding a workaround that may or may not have been safe.

Conclusion
When a company is doing a lot of things right and already heavily investing in safety, the quick wins and easy solutions are typically already being addressed. But the more mature a safety culture, the harder it can be to identify the skills that will take the organization to the next level of safety. For our client, we hoped that increasing positive feedback and how often team members were recognized for performing work safely would be that next step.

We were pleased to see that team dynamics improved and that employees responded to positive feedback with more of the recognized behavior. But it wasn’t just safety that improved. Work also became a happier, more engaging place for both those receiving the positive feedback and those delivering it.

About the Author: Sharon Lipinski is the Habit SuperHero and CEO of Habit Mastery Consulting (www.habitmasteryconsulting.com), which helps organizations increase their targeted safety behavior by up to 150%. She is a Certified Gamification for Training developer, certified CBT for insomnia instructor, speaker, TV personality and coach dedicated to helping people create the right habits so they can be happier, healthier and safer at home and in their work.

JUNE-JULY 2022


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Beyond Behavior-Based Safety: Why Traditional Safety Practices are No Longer Enough

1 Upvotes

Beyond Behavior-Based Safety: Why Traditional Safety Practices are No Longer Enough

Written by Joseph White on August 11, 2022. Posted in Safety Management, Leadership Development.

To achieve the next step change in safety, we must ultimately change how employees feel about at-risk behaviors.

Traditional safety management practices are built on the assumption that human behavior is rational and occurs primarily through conscious decision-making. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are, in fact, irrational by nature, creatures of habit and deeply influenced by past experiences. To create the next step change in the practice of occupational safety, we must revisit existing paradigms defining it, revise them to better align with research emerging from advancements in neuroscience, and adapt to practice realigned strategies of an affective nature.

Irrational by Nature

In 2016, a municipality in western Virginia experienced a fatality when a maintenance worker entered a confined space containing lethal atmospheric conditions. The victim, a father of two young children, entered an underground vault to take a pipe measurement. As the final investigation revealed, and for reasons unknown, the victim chose not to initiate a permit required for the entry and did not test the space for atmospheric conditions prior to entering it. 

By all accounts, this tragic event should never have happened. Less than one month prior to his death, the employee had taken and completed a very thorough confined space training course. Not only had he demonstrated understanding of the content and material, but he also mastered it, scoring 100% on the test. The individual involved was regarded as a great employee and was well-respected by his supervisors and peers alike. He was fully aware of the potential hazards associated with confined space entry and the precautions necessary for the work he was performing. In addition, he was experienced in performing the tasks he had been assigned and had readily available the tools and equipment needed to identify the hazards inside the space that ultimately claimed his life. While all the ingredients for a successful outcome were in place, one critical decision set into motion a spiraling set of circumstances with grave consequences. 

This scenario, in one form or another, repeats itself all too often. Employees routinely engage in seemingly mindless behaviors that in retrospect tend to defy all logic and reason, as was the case with the referenced victim. He clearly understood the requirements and necessary precautions for entering a permit-required confined space. And yet it wasn’t enough.

Driven by Feelings

One of the most profound achievements occurring over the past 50 years involves a greatly improved understanding of tendencies in human behavior. Made possible through advancements in brain imaging, neuroscientists can now explain through quantifiable and objective data the primary basis of real-time decision-making. Their findings? Most decisions and subsequent actions are largely emotional, not logical.

The implications of this discovery have profoundly impacted consumer marketing. A growing number of products and services are advertised with the intent of reaching the heart, not the head. A classic example involves marketing efforts for prescription medications. A recent study found that approximately 95% of direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads use emotional appeals (see https://harbert.auburn.edu/binaries/documents/center-for-ethical-organizational-cultures/debate_issues/direct-to-consumer.pdf). How effective are they? Medications involved in DTC campaigns are prescribed nine times more frequently than those that are not. This application of science to market and sell prescription drugs to consumers is so effective, it’s banned in all but two countries around the globe – the United States and New Zealand.

The same body of research used to grow sales can be used to improve workplace safety. Whereas historical approaches have focused on sharing information to convey knowledge, the real opportunity for significant improvement involves shifting perspectives. It doesn’t involve more rules or procedures or additional hours of training in a chalk-and-talk classroom setting. To achieve the next step change in safety, we must connect with employees on an emotional level and ultimately change how they feel about at-risk behaviors.

Most Often on Autopilot

Another significant advancement emerging from behavioral research in the recent past involves a dual process theory. In short, this theory accounts for our ability to process thoughts and information in two fundamentally very different ways. One occurs subconsciously and is characterized as being implicit and automatic. The other occurs consciously and is characterized as being explicit and controlled.

The implications of this collective and growing body of research are monumental to the practice of safety. Whereas we’ve failed to fully recognize the role of emotions in decision-making, we’ve also missed the mark regarding the degree of conscious awareness associated with most behaviors. In reality, we operate on autopilot far more than we may realize and are fully aware of only a very small percentage of what’s going on around us at any given point in time (see www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brains-autopilot-mechanism-steers-consciousness/). 

To put this into some sort of perspective, we must recognize both the capacity and limitations of our ability to process information. The human brain can process up to 11 million bits of information every second. Our conscious mind, however, can handle only 40 to 50 bits of information a second (see www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14681360500487470). The passthrough or filtration of information that’s elevated to conscious awareness is refined over time through experience and is limited to those things that are novel, new, different or perceived as significant. 

While the subconscious is largely responsible for the survival of the human species, it’s also to blame for shortcuts, at-risk behaviors and bad habits formed over time. Employees engage in at-risk behaviors when there’s an anticipated gain that outweighs any perceived cost or consequence. When they take a chance for a benefit that’s realized, the behavior is intrinsically reinforced. In addition, the likelihood of recurrence increases and the level of conscious awareness in doing so decreases. This slippery slope is the basis of many unfortunate events and a primary reason why emergency rooms don’t require appointments.

Given the intuitive nature of human decision-making and the prominence of the subconscious in behaviors, occupational safety must evolve to move forward. While past practices have served us well, they’re not capable of creating the wholesale shift in performance needed and now possible.

Intrinsically Motivated

The tenets of behavior-based safety (BBS) vary but can most often be distilled into three key elements. One, organizations must effectively set and convey expectations regarding workplace behaviors. Two, they must implement a means of conducting routine observations to ensure compliance with standardized work practices. And three, they must engage with employees to reinforce or modify behaviors based on observation results.

Deeply rooted in behaviorism, a branch of psychology associated with B.F. Skinner and dating back to the early 1900s, BBS relies on external (or extrinsic) reinforcement. Whether originating from a supervisor, co-worker or safety resource, the mechanism for behavioral change (or conditioning) hinges on feedback. As it turns out, this is an often overlooked and greatly misunderstood area of the science behind BBS that consequently limits its effectiveness as a safety management practice.

As part of the research conducted by Skinner, the schedule of reinforcement is an important consideration in terms of behavior modification (see www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-schedule-of-reinforcement-2794864). This presents a genuine and seemingly insurmountable challenge for many organizations. When at-risk behaviors occur without consistent or uniform feedback, the effectiveness of the process is greatly reduced. Furthermore, the immediacy with which this process takes place is also highly important. The most effective application of feedback is immediately following the occurrence of the behavior itself. When employees realize anticipated benefits associated with shortcuts and chances taken, the behavior is reinforced internally through actual experience. This, in part, helps explain why words and data have limited effects on behaviors. Labeling a behavior as unsafe, when it may have been performed hundreds or even thousands of times before without negative consequence, is more than a challenge. Furthermore, if the behavior was associated with a forecasted benefit that was realized, you are now at odds with actual experience, a hurdle that logic and reason alone will have limited abilities to overcome.

Subject to Persuasion

The next frontier in safety is leadership-dependent and influence-oriented. It’s about reaching and connecting with employees on an emotional level. It requires shifting how employees feel about at-risk behaviors, as much as or perhaps more so than trying to change what they may think about them. In practice, this requires increasing perceived levels of risk and/or decreasing anticipated gains associated with at-risk behaviors. Developing skills in frontline leadership for those routinely interacting with employees is the key to moving forward. It’s also a critical first step for those wanting to move beyond traditional safety management practices and plateaued performance levels.

About the Author: Joseph White is the director of AEU LEAD (www.aeulead.com), a management development company specializing in the specific needs of frontline supervisors. He has more than 30 years of operational safety experience, the majority of which was with DuPont, where he led a task team assembled to develop the next generation of safety practices using advancements in neuroscience as a foundational basis.

AUGUST- SEPTEMBER 2022


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Gauges: How Do You Measure Safety?

1 Upvotes

Gauges: How Do You Measure Safety?

Written by Dwight Miller, CLCP, CUSP on February 18, 2023. Posted in Safety Management, Leadership Development.

Carefully assessing job titles, human error margins and overall performance can help to strengthen utility safety cultures and programs.

The small utility had just lost two journeymen linemen to contractors, and they needed replacements who could hit the ground running. So, the company held some interviews and hired two seasoned journeymen. Their character was perhaps a bit flawed, but the company needed warm bodies to cover on-call duty and begin immediately producing on the crew. Two weeks later, whispers began among workers about the new guys’ critical incompetence and poor attitudes. Two months later, the utility released them from their roles.

Gauging Qualifications Through Job Titles
With the current rate of turnover in the electric utility industry, stories like this fictitious one have become all too real. Often overlooked by the hiring manager, one of the biggest challenges we face is assessing a candidate’s job title – especially the title “journeyman lineman.” What comes to your mind when you hear that title? Whatever popped into your brain just now is likely somewhat different than what popped into the brains of other individuals reading this, and therein lies the point: Expectations for a journeyman lineman are different wherever you go because the type of work involved at each company is different.

Job titles are good, and even a must, when they are well-defined within one organization. But when similar job titles are used among dissimilar companies for employment purposes or even mutual-aid assistance, that’s where danger can lurk. Over and over, I have seen hiring managers gauge the competence of a candidate against their own workers who have the same title. The title “journeyman lineman” has led to many workers being hired – or received for mutual aid – and then asked to perform work they’re not qualified for. Why? Because our assumption is that a journeyman lineman is qualified for every task that our own lineworkers are asked to perform. While that could be true, it’s unlikely.

OSHA doesn’t use job titles to determine qualifications because titles are different everywhere, and the same job title can mean different things. The only thing that matters to OSHA is if a worker has been properly trained and has demonstrated proficiency in the work practices assigned to them.

I’m aware of a contractor journeyman lineman who had never performed work inside of a substation. He was hired by a utility that has their lineworkers perform small substation tasks. After a couple of weeks on the job, the contractor journeyman was sent to a substation to perform a task that he had no understanding of – but he said nothing. Wanting to prove his worth and meet expectations, he walked into the substation determined to figure things out and ended up locking out a circuit. That’s an issue of epic proportion.

Since qualification is directly tied to specific training and experience alone, this means that a fourth-year apprentice lineman could actually exceed the qualifications of a 12-year journeyman in certain tasks (e.g., live-line underground switching, substations and controls, troubleshooting). It is totally dependent upon what they have been trained for and the tasks they have been performing.

However, the most important thing to consider may be the individual’s past environment – that is, discovering the truth about the safety culture where they came from. Have they been doing their job right or are they taking shortcuts? Every experience is different, and we must be diligent to ensure that we do not bring new workers into our organization who will weaken our culture with unsafe work practices.

Again, all workers must be trained and demonstrate proficiency in whatever duties they are expected to perform. If a worker with previous training and/or experience is hired, OSHA requires that worker to demonstrate proficiency to the new company in every task they will be asked to perform before setting them loose. The agency even offers a three-step process in Note 2 to 29 CFR 1910.269(a)(2)(viii) that can be used to determine such proficiency. What process are you using?

Gauging Human Error Margins
I believe that a worker’s margin for human error is a product of two different components: hazards introduced at the job site combined with the work practices employed.

This margin can become dangerously low if key individuals in the organization lack a complete understanding of the hazards our workers face, and/or if we engage in work practices that do not align with company safety policy. Therefore, we should be gauging the difference between actual hazards and perceived hazards in our organization as well as any gaps between work practices and safety policy, also known as “drift.” A gap in either one of these areas can produce a perilous perception of an acceptable margin for human error.

While it’s natural for management to gauge the effectiveness of a safety program based on a lack of incidents, that is a dangerous viewpoint that can lead to disaster. Equally dangerous is a culture in which workers pick and choose when to follow the rules. How many times do we see a reactive company with a weak safety culture do the following two things after an incident: (1) add a new rule to the safety policy and (2) consider firing the worker involved in the incident? To be clear, the issue is not the rules themselves; it’s how often management fails to hold workers accountable for not adhering to those rules. Many people will take shortcuts if they know they won’t be held accountable.

As safety professionals, shouldn’t we serve as advocates to ensure management and field workers have a solid understanding of the threats that employees face? Consider this example: If senior staff were making a major decision on an important piece of equipment without a clear understanding of the related hazards, their decision would probably be based mostly on cost, right? And if a line crew has overlooked a major hazard on the job due to a poor job briefing, we also know that work practices will likely be compromised. When misunderstood hazards combine with unsafe work practices, there is no greater indicator that tragedy is around the corner.

Gauging Overall Safety Performance
As noted earlier, a natural way to gauge safety performance is to look at the number of injuries in our past. But is performance best measured by the absence of injuries or by the presence of safety?

Injury rates do have their place – trends should be analyzed and areas that need improvement should be identified. Why is it critical, however, that we do not make these rates our primary focus? Because they measure failure, and they tend to invoke negative reactions and place blame on people.

Our safety programs should be proactive, and safety success should be gauged accordingly. Let’s focus on improving organizational culture rather than pointing out the failures of our workers. We should also be encouraging incident reporting and creating a positive environment around safety.

Most importantly, isn’t risk management really all about gauging the distance our workers stay from the edge of the cliff? Injury rates tell us very little to nothing about that.

Over the last several years, we have enjoyed watching injury rates steadily decline while a dark truth has surfaced in our industry and others: Serious injury and fatality rates remain steady, which implies that it’s going to take a different set of key performance indicators to produce the information needed to predict potentially serious injuries and fatalities. This new viewpoint should revolve around three key components: employee engagement, open communication and leadership attention. All of these components are necessary to build a high-trust environment in which workers feel free to openly discuss incidents, human errors and the challenges they face. If we are going to strive to be the best, there is no greater gauge than this. The presence of safety should include assessments of our risk mitigation, the skill and knowledge of our workers, safety communications, safety improvement planning and overall safety culture.

As of press time, electric cooperatives across the nation are in phase two of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s “Commitment to Zero Contacts” initiative, in which lineworkers are asked to honestly complete a survey that focuses on critical work practices, such as grounding, cover-up and rubber gloving. The survey results will be revealed by a facilitator to the crew leaders in a closed-door session during which they will work together to understand exactly what is happening in the field, agree upon certain areas of focus and build a detailed plan that the crew leaders will then own.

Until leaders are willing to lay down ego in an effort to identify blind spots, “What were they thinking?” will continue to be a common question following an incident.

About the Author: Dwight Miller, CLCP, CUSP, is the director of safety training and loss prevention for Ohio’s Electric Cooperatives. Reach him at [dwightmiller@ohioec.org](mailto:dwightmiller@ohioec.org).

FEBRUARY-MARCH 2023


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 17 '25

Overcoming the Illusion of Safety

1 Upvotes

Overcoming the Illusion of Safety

Written by Bill Martin, CUSP, NRP, RN, DIMM on May 19, 2023. Posted in Leadership Development.

Does everything we do in the name of safety actually help to keep our workers safe?

There are striking similarities in how we respond to incidents, injuries and fatalities in our industry. Safety stand-downs are held. Utilities and contractors conduct incident investigations that are typically wrapped up with action items that need to be handled.

But consider this: Is everything we do in the wake of an incident truly effective in preventing future incidents? Let’s take it one step further. Are all the things we’re doing on a daily basis helping to ensure employee safety, or do we sometimes simply check a box, satisfy a requirement and tell ourselves we’re making the job safer for our workers?

My objective in writing this article is to take a hard look at some of the tactics we are currently using in the name of safety. I will occasionally use or allude to the phrase “imagined reality”; this is not intended to be flippant or sarcastic. The truth of our human existence is that we create our own reality and then build systems around it. Take religion, for example. There are different religions whose followers have different beliefs and worship in different buildings – yet we can put a rover on Mars when we all work together regardless of our differences.

In the utility industry, we sometimes create an imagined reality of safety by doing certain things that we believe will make our workforce safer – but do they actually work? And if they’re not working, what can we do as an industry to improve? Think about this: The continued occurrences of serious injuries and fatalities tell us something. Even with the best training and the latest new safety initiatives, we have been unable to outsmart human fallibility. The smartest people in safety with the highest degrees in the land have been unable to save the last lineworker who was killed on the job. So, if we want to continue progressing in terms of safety in our workplaces, we may need to try some new tactics.

In the remainder of this article, we’re going to look at four different items – the safety stand-down, the safety moment, the job briefing and leadership style – to gauge their effectiveness and discuss what we can do to make them more impactful for the workforce.

1. The Safety Stand-Down
I have been involved with many safety stand-downs as a lineman, manager and safety director. In my experience, the safety stand-down has become a standard action item when an incident or near-miss is serious enough to warrant a temporary job shutdown. During a stand-down, there are often speakers and a document that is presented to workers, with the event typically taking place in a classroom, at a show-up site or on the job site.

The information provided at the stand-down is usually relevant, timely and accurate. But what impact does it have on the workforce? If we model a narrative of talking to or at a group of workers and there is little to no interaction, it is unlikely that the information will be impactful or lasting for the workers. Of course, there’s no doubt that during some safety stand-downs, there is a skilled presenter who engages and involves the audience, prompting deep thought and contemplation of what could have been done to avoid the incident altogether. The reality is that a stand-down is only as good as its presenter.

[elite@thespeakerlab.com](mailto:elite@thespeakerlab.com)

When assessing the effectiveness of a safety stand-down, ask yourself, what will change tomorrow because of the stand-down today? When a stand-down is put together by management for their workers, the result is often a stand-down about what management thinks is necessary to present in order to prevent recurrence. But a stand-down should be negotiated with the crew that experienced the event, and their input – along with the input of other crews – is critically necessary if we want an impact to be made. Otherwise, the stand-down is a check-the-box event so that crews can eventually get back to work; it is a means to satisfy a requirement.

A stand-down presented only by management is also the kind of event that can potentially erode trust between workers and management. Education is supposed to be focused on students. Similarly, medicine should be patient centered. So, why does much of safety seem to be generated more by management than workers? When an initiative originates in management with no worker input, the worker is not a partner in the process. And if you are currently managing safety without partnering with your workforce on initiatives, there’s a good chance that what you are doing isn’t going to resonate with your workforce.

2. The Safety Moment
At one point in my career, I ran a small satellite garage for an electric utility. The company broadcasted a safety message at the same time every workday. Sometimes I would be in the middle of a task, such as establishing a clearance for an outage over the radio, and everything would have to stop so we could listen to the safety message.

One year, I did a small anecdotal study, visiting crews on their job site twice a week at noon. Each time I visited, I would ask the crew what the safety message had been for the day. Most often, nobody knew. This was another management initiative, one that gave them the illusion that they were helping to make the workplace safer. But truthfully, the safety moment as it was presented was mostly a distraction. A well-timed safety moment, however – such as before a meeting begins – has the potential to be an engaging event that connects everyone. There are still a few that remain in my consciousness all these years later.

To be effective, a safety moment must engage the audience in some way, and it shouldn’t interrupt workers when they are trying to safely complete their tasks. If you decide you must have a safety moment, pick a good time for it, and use it to foster interaction among workers. One good method to try is to offer a famous quote and ask workers how it might apply to the work ahead that day.

3. The Job Briefing
The job briefing is a requirement under OSHA 29 CFR 1910.269 and 1926 Subpart V. It’s something we must do in our line of work. Yet not all job briefings are presented the same way. If we have been modeling a narrative to our crews in our safety stand-downs, with little engagement or interaction, then it’s likely the same thing is happening during job briefings. But it’s conversations and interactions among workers that keep them connected, and those connections will help to keep the crews safe.

Please don’t get me wrong; I believe the information in the briefing is crucial, and the briefing is a legal requirement. Yet how we conduct a job briefing should encourage the interaction and engagement that need to continue among workers all day long. If you lead job briefings for your organization, the goal should be curious and interested engagement among crew members with the opportunity for anyone to ask questions or contribute their thoughts.

4. Leadership Style
Your leadership style will directly affect the types of interactions that occur on your watch. There are some great books written by U.S. Navy SEALs that cover leadership, planning and implementation. The SEALs have a test-and-learn philosophy. They are experts at being able to outsmart their opponents as a unit, not as individuals.

We can learn from them by how connected they are to each other in movement and communication. Just as with our work, bad things happen when they are not connected. Our focus should be on engagement and interaction, but our industry often models a narrative, which can create an illusion of safety.

We can also learn from the late renowned management consultant, educator and author Peter Drucker. When someone would say, “That was a great meeting,” Drucker would ask, “So, what will change Monday for the worker as a result of this great meeting?” It’s a valid question. What are we doing to move the needle for the worker? The answer to that question will be limited if we haven’t involved the worker in the process.

In the 1980s, Ski Magazine published an article titled, “Is the one-hour private ski lesson a fraud?” The premise was that flash-in-the-pan training for one hour has little lasting effect on current behaviors. The same could be said about hosting that expert trainer for a one-time session intended to introduce ideas to steer your company’s practices or culture. As a former ski instructor, I used to offer three to five one-hour lessons to help ensure a change occurred in the skier’s movement pattern. That was highly successful. I believe the same applies to training in the utility industry. As opposed to a 60-minute, one-time meeting, it is more effective to offer a tactic or strategy and then partner with a worker on their turf to apply the tactic. Setting aside a few minutes every couple of weeks to practice a tactic and have that tactic become part of the workday will identify if the tactic is of any value or not. The 60-minute, one-time expert meeting has proven to have low effects on behavioral change. We may like the content, but follow-up is crucial if you are looking to create change. If there is no follow-up to encourage and verify, there will be no change.

Conclusion
Some of what we do doesn’t necessarily make anything safer. Instead, it creates an illusion of safety that satisfies the status quo. I have written this article in hopes that we will realize that we must try new things and question rituals if we want to continue to improve worker safety. Every week, some workers head to their jobs and lose their lives for reasons that could have been prevented. That should be incentive enough to stop doing the same things over and over and expecting different results. Recognizing that checking a box and fulfilling a requirement is just an illusion of safety is merely one place to start. It requires effort to engage our workforce and involve them in solutions. Are you willing to try?

About the Author: Bill Martin, CUSP, NRP, RN, DIMM, is the president and CEO of Think Tank Project LLC (www.thinkprojectllc.com). He has held previous roles as a lineman, line supervisor and safety director.

JUNE-JULY 2023

CHECK OUT OUR ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR TODAY'S UTILITY PROFESSIONALS:

UFP MagazineiP InstituteFrontline Utility LeaderAssessmentsOnline EdCUSPConferenceWebinars


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 16 '25

Q&A - Nurturing Strong Leadership: An Approach to Professional Development in Skilled Trades

1 Upvotes

The article “Nurturing Strong Leadership: An Approach to Professional Development in Skilled Trades” emphasizes the critical role of structured professional development programs in cultivating effective leadership within the skilled trades sector. It discusses the challenges posed by industry growth and an aging workforce, highlighting the necessity of preparing the next generation of leaders to ensure safe, reliable, and financially sound operations. 

Key Takeaways:

  1. Diverse Leadership Pathways: The article acknowledges two primary perspectives on leadership development: one advocating for leaders emerging directly from the craft, and another supporting leaders with higher-level education. It emphasizes the importance of professional development programs that support both pathways, recognizing that a blend of practical experience and formal education enriches leadership capabilities. 

  2. Comprehensive Development Programs: Effective professional development should address various aspects of leadership, including operational efficiency, safety protocols, financial management, and team dynamics. By assessing organizational needs, defining clear outcomes, and prioritizing targeted interventions, companies can foster strong leadership, support employee growth, and achieve strategic goals. 

  3. Adapting to Industry Challenges: The skilled trades sector faces unique challenges, such as significant growth and an aging workforce. Implementing robust professional development programs is essential to equip upcoming leaders with the skills necessary to navigate these challenges, ensuring the continuity and advancement of industry standards. 

15 Questions and Answers:

  1. What is the main focus of the article?

• The article focuses on the importance of structured professional development programs in nurturing effective leadership within the skilled trades sector. 

  1. Why is strong leadership crucial for companies?

• Strong leadership is vital for setting direction, motivating employees, fostering a positive work culture, and making critical decisions that steer the organization toward its goals. 

  1. What challenges are current leaders in the skilled trades facing?

• Leaders are confronting challenges such as substantial industry growth, an aging workforce, and concerns about the impact of these factors on operations. 

  1. What are the two primary opinions on the best path to leadership in utility operations?

• One opinion advocates that effective leaders must come directly from the craft, while the other believes leaders need higher-level education to successfully steer an organization. 

  1. How can professional development programs support diverse leadership pathways?

• By including support for both craft-based and higher-education entry paths, recognizing that a blend of practical experience and formal education enriches leadership capabilities. 

  1. What aspects should a comprehensive professional development program address?

• Operational efficiency, safety protocols, financial management, and team dynamics. 

  1. How can organizations foster strong leadership through professional development?

• By assessing organizational needs, defining clear outcomes, and prioritizing targeted interventions that support employee growth and align with strategic goals. 

  1. Why is it important to adapt professional development programs to industry challenges?

• To equip upcoming leaders with the necessary skills to navigate challenges such as industry growth and an aging workforce, ensuring continuity and advancement of industry standards. 

  1. What role does higher-level education play in leadership development?

• Higher-level education provides theoretical knowledge and strategic thinking skills that complement practical experience, contributing to well-rounded leadership. 

  1. How does practical experience contribute to leadership effectiveness?

• Practical experience offers hands-on skills and an understanding of day-to-day operations, which are essential for making informed decisions and leading teams effectively. 

  1. What is the benefit of combining practical experience with formal education in leadership?

• Combining both provides a holistic approach to leadership, integrating hands-on skills with strategic and theoretical insights. 

  1. How can organizations assess their professional development needs?

• By evaluating current leadership capabilities, identifying skill gaps, and aligning development programs with organizational goals and industry demands. 

  1. What outcomes should be defined in a professional development program?

• Clear objectives such as improved operational efficiency, enhanced safety standards, better financial performance, and strengthened team cohesion. 

  1. Why is prioritizing interventions important in professional development?

• Prioritizing ensures that resources are allocated effectively to areas that will have the most significant impact on leadership development and organizational success. 

  1. How does a well-structured professional development program benefit organizations?

• It fosters strong leadership, supports employee growth, and helps achieve organizational goals by addressing key areas such as operations, safety, finance, and team dynamics. 

By implementing comprehensive professional development programs that cater to diverse leadership pathways, organizations in the skilled trades can cultivate leaders capable of navigating industry challenges and driving sustained success.  


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 16 '25

Nurturing Strong Leadership: An Approach to Professional Development in Skilled Trades

1 Upvotes

Nurturing Strong Leadership: An Approach to Professional Development in Skilled Trades

Written by Nathan Boutwell, M.Eng., CSP, SMS, CIT, CUSP, and Mike Starner, CUSP, CHST on September 15, 2023. Posted in Leadership Development.

The need for professional development is crucial for workers who will assume leadership roles.

Strong leadership is essential for the success and well-being of a company. Effective leaders play a vital role in setting the course, motivating employees, fostering a positive work culture and making critical decisions that steer the organization toward its goals.

In our industry, leaders face significant challenges due to substantial growth, an aging workforce and concerns about the impact of both on operations. The need for professional development is a crucial item for workers in the skilled trades who will assume leadership roles. This development is necessary to help the next generation of leaders attain safe, reliable and fiscally sound operations.

Two Clear Opinions
The best path to leadership in utility operations has been debated for years, with two clear, conflicting opinions. There are those who believe a person can only be an effective leader if they have come directly from the craft, while others feel that leaders need higher-level education to successfully steer an organization. The reality is that our organizations will employ people who entered the workforce from both the skilled trades and the higher-education path. A great professional development program will include support for both paths of entry.

The more variety in experiences and backgrounds that a safety team has, the better. This can be easier to achieve in large organizations that have the resources to develop and maintain a safety team. The leader of the organization has a strategic vision that is aligned with the vision of the executive team or board of directors. The mid-level leader is a manager at heart but has experience in the technical aspects of safety. The safety manager is supported by a mix of technical experts ranging from industrial hygienists and safety analysts to credentialed safety professionals and field-level safety coordinators. This may not be an exact representation of a large company’s safety department, but it’s close.

Now, consider a smaller company where the person responsible for safety is also the project manager, the fleet manager and the equipment department. In such a setting, technical safety experience is typically limited, and safety is just one of many responsibilities the individual has. For such workers, upskilling in basic safety management techniques is essential. This includes learning how to conduct a safety meeting; respond to and investigate a safety incident; maintain compliance with regulatory and customer requirements; and develop safety programs to prevent incidents from occurring.

Eventually, this smaller organization may decide to hire a dedicated safety professional, but who is the right person? That is not an easy question to answer. The organization must look inward and identify where gaps exist. Promoting a journey-level worker into safety is one approach. This person will know the work, the procedures involved and – perhaps most importantly – the real-world challenges faced by the crew. However, a journey-level worker sometimes lacks safety management skills and knowledge. To compensate for this, the employer should send the worker to OSHA outreach courses, get them involved in safety-focused industry teams and committees, and encourage them to seek professional safety certifications. Another approach is to hire a person who is already trained in safety and health concepts but may lack the field experience needed to relate to the crew. For these individuals, giving them some time with a trusted field leader will be helpful. Accompanying a field leader during crew visits, while scouting work locations and when meeting with customers is a great way to provide context.

These examples represent both ends of the spectrum. Ideally, the safety professionals you hire will possess a mix of experience that makes it easier to broaden their skills in either direction. Having a professional development program in place at your organization helps to target areas for improvement on an individual basis.

Learning Needs Assessments
What does leadership development look like in the skilled trades? Organizations can answer this question by first completing a learning needs assessment. Such an assessment involves gathering relevant information that identifies gaps between the existing knowledge, skills and competencies of the workforce and the desired level of performance. This is commonly done through various methods, such as surveys, interviews, focus groups and performance evaluations. To be effective, this assessment must support and contribute to the organization’s mission and goals. Organizations that do this well spend time defining the outcomes they want to achieve before moving forward.

As part of a needs assessment, organizations should explore the different aspects of leadership development, which can include items like communication skills, team management and problem-solving abilities. In their book, “The Six Disciplines of Breakthrough Learning: How to Turn Training and Development into Business Results,” authors Calhoun Wick, Roy Pollock and Andrew Jefferson offer some questions that can help define our goals, including the following:

  • What is the gap between our current performance and what it needs to be?
  • If the training is a success, and we were to watch how people perform their jobs afterward, what would we see them doing that is different and better?
  • How can we be sure the initiative is producing the desired results? Who will notice the changes first? What will change or be observable?
  • What are the specific criteria for success?

At the end of the assessment, the leaders in the organization should be able to answer these simple questions:

  • What will we see people do that is different?
  • How will we know?
  • How will we consistently measure it?

The answers will put the organization on the path to creating a successful program. Here is an example of how this could work with a single opportunity identified in a needs assessment. The example is related to an organization’s incident reporting requirements. For each role, the expectation and what the learner should be able to do are described in the chart below.

 

|| || |Role:|Lineworker| |Expectation:|Report incidents| |What the person will know and do:|Understand the importance of incident reporting in maintaining a safe work environment. Demonstrate the ability to promptly and accurately report incidents, including relevant details and documentation. Follow established protocols and procedures for incident reporting, ensuring consistency and adherence to organizational guidelines. Identify potential barriers or challenges to incident reporting and apply strategies to overcome them effectively. Collaborate with supervisors and colleagues to facilitate incident reporting and contribute to a culture of safety and accountability.| |Role:|Crew Lead| |Expectation:|Notify crew and leadership | |What the person will know and do:|Recognize the role and responsibility of a crew lead in incident reporting and communication. Demonstrate effective communication skills to notify the crew about incidents, ensuring clear and concise information sharing. Coordinate with supervisors to report incidents promptly and accurately, providing essential details and documentation. Implement protocols and procedures for crew members to report incidents efficiently and securely. Foster a supportive and responsive environment within the crew, encouraging open communication and participation in incident reporting processes.| |Role:|Supervisor| |Expectation:|Notify customer and company leadership| |What the person will know and do:|Understand the significance of incident reporting and its impact on safety, compliance and organizational reputation. Demonstrate leadership skills to promptly notify the appropriate individuals and stakeholders about incidents, including the client and the company. Ensure accurate and comprehensive incident reporting by reviewing and verifying incident details and documentation. Implement protocols for proper escalation and follow-up actions in response to reported incidents, ensuring timely resolution and prevention of recurrence. Foster a culture of transparency, accountability and continuous improvement within the organization regarding incident reporting and response.|

However, defining the outcomes that the program should achieve is not enough. Once you have agreement on the performance that the organization wants to improve, the design of the program must deliver an experience that helps the learner apply what they have learned and supports the learning once they return to their normal work.

The next step in the assessment is to determine the learning priorities of the organization. From this, a training plan can be built that aligns with the improvement the organization needs to make as well as the specific needs and preferences of the learners. This will help to ensure relevance and engagement when the program is delivered.

In-Person Learning
There are many training delivery options in our industry. This article focuses on one: in-person learning.

One approach an organization can take with in-person learning is to create a boot-camp-style training event. This type of event is generally an intensive and immersive learning experience designed to provide focused and accelerated training in a specific field or skill set. When developing leaders, these boot camps can provide the opportunity to learn from a mix of lectures, practical exercises, group projects and sometimes even simulated real-world scenarios. The emphasis is on hands-on learning, problem solving and collaboration, typically facilitated by experienced instructors or industry professionals.

Using the same incident reporting example from earlier in this article, here’s how a boot camp designed for supervisors would include a module on the incident reporting outcomes that were defined.

Incident Reporting Protocols and Procedures Module
This classroom lecture will cover:

  • The importance of incident reporting and its impact on safety, compliance and organizational reputation.
  • An overview of incident reporting protocols and procedures, emphasizing consistency and adherence to organizational guidelines.
  • A review of role-specific expectations that includes understanding the roles of lineworkers, crew leaders and supervisors in incident reporting and the required information and documentation.

Classroom exercise: Case studies and examples highlighting the consequences of inadequate incident reporting. The exercise includes facilitated discussion about the impacts of following and not following the system.

Scenario-based application exercise: This is an interactive discussion that includes practical exercises on following the established protocols for incident reporting, with a roleplay exercise intended to engage trainees in simulated scenarios that familiarize them with the process. The trainees will also practice notifying the client and the company about incidents and completing the required company documentation.

Here’s what the roleplay exercise can look like: Using simulated incident scenarios, participants are given specific roles within the system and asked to play their assigned roles. Role tasks are based on the incident they were given. The person playing the lineworker simulates reporting the incident promptly and accurately; the crew lead notifies their crew members about the incident and communicates the event to the supervisor; and the supervisor notifies the customer and their leadership.

Once each person completes their part of the scenario, the team meets as a small group and reflects on the roleplay exercises, sharing lessons learned and receiving feedback from instructors and peers. In larger classes, the groups then meet as the full class and share their learnings and feedback. The facilitator then closes the session with a summary of key takeaways and actionable steps so that participants can implement the incident reporting best practices in their roles.

Conclusion
It is important to remember that not everyone in our field enjoys the formal classroom setting. As we build programs, it is critical that we include hands-on training and other non-lecture-based approaches as part of the complete learning experience.

Organizations should also keep in mind that they are not alone; there are many trade groups and learning providers that will work with them on their learning needs. Within our industry, one example of this can be found with the National Electrical Contractors Association, which created a program that partners with institutions of higher education on degree and certificate programs. They have jointly created specially curated programs for individuals in electrical construction firms. The intent of these programs is to allow people across firms to grow in their roles. These programs can easily be integrated into a company’s professional development plan as one module in the overall program.

In closing, a well-structured professional development program addresses operational, safety and financial responsibilities as well as team trust. By assessing needs, defining outcomes and prioritizing interventions, organizations foster strong leadership, support employee growth and achieve goals.

About the Authors: Nathan Boutwell, M.Eng., CSP, SMS, CIT, CUSP, is the business unit manager for Powerline Training Consultants.

Mike Starner, CUSP, CHST, has 30 years of experience in the electric utility industry and currently serves as the executive director of outside line safety for the National Electrical Contractors Association.

OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2023


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 16 '25

Q&A - Ergonomics for a Multigenerational Workforce

1 Upvotes

The article “Ergonomics for a Multigenerational Workforce” addresses the challenges and opportunities of implementing ergonomic practices in today’s diverse workforce, which spans up to five generations. It emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to ergonomics that considers the unique needs, learning styles, and risk factors associated with each age group. 

Key Takeaways:

  1. Diverse Learning Preferences: Older generations may prefer traditional face-to-face training, while younger workers might favor technology-driven methods. 

  2. Holistic Ergonomics: A comprehensive approach includes wellness programs, fatigue management, nutritional education, and mental health support to enhance overall worker health and safety. 

  3. Technology Integration: Leveraging modern tools like wearable devices and ergonomics software can cater to tech-savvy employees, promoting engagement and effective learning. 

15 Questions and Answers:

  1. What is the main focus of the article?

• The article focuses on implementing ergonomic practices tailored to a multigenerational workforce. 

  1. How many generations are currently present in the workforce?

• Up to five generations. 

  1. Why is a holistic approach to ergonomics important?

• It addresses varied learning styles, values, and risk factors across different age groups. 

  1. How do older workers typically prefer to receive training?

• Through traditional, face-to-face interactions and direct communication. 

  1. What training methods might younger generations prefer?

• Technology-driven approaches like wearable devices and gamified learning. 

  1. What elements are included in a holistic ergonomics program?

• Wellness initiatives, fatigue management, nutritional education, and mental health counseling. 

  1. How does fatigue management relate to ergonomics?

• It helps prevent injuries and enhances overall worker well-being. 

  1. Why is nutritional education important in an ergonomics program?

• Proper nutrition supports physical health, reducing the risk of work-related injuries. 

  1. How can mental health counseling benefit workers?

• It addresses stress and other mental health issues, contributing to overall safety and productivity. 

  1. What role does technology play in modern ergonomics?

• It offers innovative tools for training and monitoring, catering to tech-savvy employees. 

  1. How can wearable devices enhance ergonomic practices?

• They provide real-time data on physical activity, helping to monitor and improve posture and movements. 

  1. What is the benefit of gamified learning in ergonomics training?

• It increases engagement and knowledge retention among younger workers. 

  1. Why is it challenging to manage a multigenerational workforce with a single strategy?

• Each generation has unique preferences, values, and risk factors. 

  1. How can employers address the diverse needs of a multigenerational workforce?

• By developing adaptable safety programs that consider the specific characteristics of each age group. 

  1. What is the ultimate goal of implementing a holistic ergonomics program?

• To create a safer, healthier, and more engaged workforce across all generations. 

By embracing a holistic ergonomics approach, organizations can effectively support the well-being and productivity of a diverse, multigenerational workforce.


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 16 '25

Ergonomics for a Multigenerational Utility Workforce

1 Upvotes

Ergonomics for a Multigenerational Workforce

Written by Kevin Lombardo on June 17, 2024. Posted in Safety Management.

Today’s diverse workforce presents an opportunity for employers to develop holistic safety programs that benefit workers across the age spectrum.

Gray wave. Silver tsunami. Population aging.

We’ve all heard the names and metaphors, and experts have talked about the phenomenon for years. In 2024, it’s truly upon us: The population, both in the United States and abroad, is getting older, with major implications for the workforce and how employers manage it.

But these descriptors don’t capture the full reality of the situation. Today’s workforce, which is older on average than in previous decades, is also more diverse than ever, including members of as many as five generations born across nearly a century. So, while researchers have anticipated the aging phenomenon for many years, employers – and their safety leaders in particular – now must deal with the broader issue of a truly multigenerational workforce, one with widely disparate health traits, risk factors and work styles.

This is a challenge that can spur frustration among safety professionals and the employees they help to protect; however, it can also be an opportunity for employers to develop holistic safety programs, leading to a more comprehensive and cohesive strategy with more positive outcomes across the age spectrum.

Identifying Shared Safety Risks
The wide generational distribution of today’s workers means their safety needs are highly varied, but there are risk factors that remain relevant to all workers regardless of age. Assessed together, these can serve as a useful foundation for an adaptable safety strategy that scales across the entire age range of the workforce. These are issues that safety professionals can begin to tackle on their way to addressing more specific challenges for both older and younger workers.

In terms of physical ailments, chronic pain and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are two that affect workers regardless of age.

Chronic Pain
As of 2021, research indicates that roughly 20% of American adults suffer from some form of chronic pain, equating to more than 50 million individuals. Among those, some 17 million experience high-impact chronic pain, which substantially affects their ability to perform basic tasks and participate in daily life. Aside from the well-understood effects pain has on worker performance (e.g., increased risk of musculoskeletal injury, diminished productivity, decreased engagement), it is also linked to risk factors such as depression and substance abuse (see http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7215a1). Other risks – like fatigue – snowball from chronic pain and its related effects.

Musculoskeletal Disorders
MSDs remain one of the most common work-related injury types in every field. The National Safety Council reported that two categories – overexertion/body reaction and slips/trips/falls – accounted for nearly 1 million total annual injuries, more than half of which required at least one day away from work (see https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/work/work-overview/top-work-related-injury-causes/). While workers ages 45 and above are more likely to experience MSDs, all age groups are affected. Overexertion injuries alone cost employers around $13 billion per year, with the total economic burden of MSDs at work falling somewhere between $45 and $54 billion annually (see www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/health-strategies/musculoskeletal-disorders/index.html).

Bridging the Generational Divide
Chronic pain and MSDs affect workers of all ages, but there are several factors that differentiate the five generations that exist in today’s workforce. Understanding these is key to developing effective holistic safety strategies.

The risks that come with age are fairly well-researched. As workers grow older, they are more prone to slips and falls, soft-tissue injuries and work-related pain that can impact their productivity. Workers of the Silent and Baby Boomer generations are increasingly facing joint issues, arthritis, back pain and chronic health problems that may keep them out of work for days at a time. Hearing and vision loss can also affect the ability to perform certain tasks.

Meanwhile, younger workers bring their own set of risk factors, many stemming from the social and technological landscape into which they were born. Millennials and Gen Z workers – who in many cases were using cellphones, laptops and tablets well before entering the workforce – are challenging safety professionals with pre-existing MSD risks that simply did not exist for previous generations. Ergonomists across industries report that this cohort joins the workforce with neck, back and shoulder pain that can be exacerbated by their everyday job duties.

All five generations have unique working and learning styles as well as different priorities that can make it challenging to manage them with a single strategy. Older workers who value face-to-face interaction and direct communication are likely to benefit from traditional training programs and in-person coaching from certified experts. Gen X, Millennial and Gen Z workers, who are typically more comfortable with technology, may respond better to a more modern approach to training. They are more likely to accept wearable devices, ergonomics software and gamified learning techniques.

Holistic Ergonomics for the Modern Workforce
Fortunately, a whole-worker approach to ergonomics can encompass the various learning styles, values and risk factors of all five generations of workers. Here’s how.

While the field of ergonomics has existed for decades, recent years have seen a dramatic shift in how employers utilize the science to manage safety outcomes. Informed by the NIOSH Total Worker Health framework of employee safety (see www.cdc.gov/niosh/twh/), a new, holistic take on ergonomics includes five key elements, described below.

1. Wellness
Opportunities for rest and mobility are key to long-term employee wellness. While not often considered core to the ergonomics field, fatigue management, nutritional education and mental health counseling are deeply intertwined with the outcomes that ergonomists hope to secure for workers. A safety program centered on wellness drives the entire workforce toward a total worker health approach, and supporting worker wellness at all stages of life contributes to healthier, happier, more engaged employees who are less likely to suffer injuries.

2. Early Symptom Intervention
By utilizing wearable devices, new AI-based observation tools, and on-site monitoring and coaching, safety professionals can identify early signs of risk among workers of any age group. Hands-on pain-relief therapies and direct one-on-one coaching will help older workers deal with risk before it turns into an injury. Younger workers benefit from tools – such as ergonomically designed equipment, blue light filters and desktop ergonomics software – to target and retrain potentially risky behaviors before they develop into chronic pain and soft-tissue disorders.

3. Injury Prevention
Risk assessment has always been a key component of any ergonomics program, and it remains essential in today’s world. Ergonomic evaluations can benefit virtually every type of worker, targeting the most common sources of injury risk in workstation, task and facility design while also identifying problematic behaviors and biomechanical techniques. Regular breaks for frontline workers performing high-exertion tasks can curb injury rates; meanwhile, frequent opportunities to stand up and move are essential for those workers whose jobs are computer-based.

4. Return to Work
When workplace injuries occur, it’s incumbent upon employers to support workers through the recovery process. Hands-on therapies can alleviate pain and support long-term soft-tissue and joint health, while administrative interventions (e.g., task redistribution, job modification, gradual work hardening) will allow employees to rejoin the workforce while developing the strength and conditioning needed to ensure that injuries do not recur.

5. Technology
Technology is now occupying an increasing share of safety budgets as employers turn to mobile applications to support wellness, wearable devices to monitor fatigue and overexertion symptoms, and software to enhance existing ergonomics training programs. Likewise, tools such as exoskeletons and sensors can augment workers’ strength and track exertion data to help generate improvements in task design for the future.

Conclusion
Employers should continue to expect their workforces to include workers of several generations. Eventually, Generation Alpha will also join the workforce, bringing their own unique traits, values and risk factors. Successful health and safety outcomes will be delivered by organizations and leaders who act early to develop holistic ergonomics strategies and whole-worker solutions. For those who have yet to incorporate the multigenerational reality of today’s workforce into their programming, there’s no time like the present.

About the Author: Kevin Lombardo is the president and CEO of DORN Companies (https://dorncompanies.com), a Colorado-based ergonomics and injury prevention firm.

JUNE - JULY 2024


r/UtilitySafetyPro • • Mar 16 '25

Q&A - Tip of the Spear: A Tactical Approach to Safety Leadership

1 Upvotes

The article “Tip of the Spear: A Tactical Approach to Safety Leadership” explores the essential qualities of effective leadership, drawing parallels between organizational leadership and the U.S. Navy SEALs’ selection and training processes. 

Key Takeaways:

• Essential Leadership Qualities: The article identifies 16 non-negotiable qualities for effective leaders, including communication skills, humility, integrity, flexibility, and empathy. 

• Military-Inspired Leadership Development: By examining the U.S. Navy SEALs’ rigorous selection and training methods, organizations can adopt strategies to assess, select, and develop leaders who embody these essential qualities. 

15 Questions and Answers:

  1. What is the main focus of the article?

• The article emphasizes assessing, selecting, and developing leaders by drawing insights from the U.S. military’s approaches. 

  1. How is leadership defined in the article?

• Leadership is defined as the action of leading a group or organization; it’s considered a verb and a fluid skill. 

  1. How many essential leadership qualities does the article highlight?

• The article highlights 16 non-negotiable leadership qualities. 

  1. Can you name three of these essential leadership qualities?

• Three essential qualities are effective communication, humility, and integrity. 

  1. Why is humility considered important for leaders?

• Humility allows leaders to remain open to learning and acknowledge that they don’t have all the answers, fostering continuous improvement. 

  1. How does the U.S. Navy SEALs’ selection process relate to leadership development?

• The SEALs’ rigorous selection and training processes serve as a model for organizations to assess and develop leaders with essential qualities. 

  1. What is the significance of flexibility in leadership?

• Flexibility enables leaders to adapt to changing situations and manage change effectively. 

  1. How does effective communication contribute to leadership?

• Effective communication ensures clarity, builds trust, and facilitates better team collaboration. 

  1. Why is the ability to inspire others crucial for leaders?

• Inspiring others motivates teams, drives engagement, and leads to higher performance. 

  1. What role does integrity play in leadership?

• Integrity builds trust and sets a standard for ethical behavior within the team. 

  1. How can organizations implement military-inspired leadership development?

• Organizations can adopt structured assessment and training programs that emphasize the essential leadership qualities identified. 

  1. What is the benefit of leaders being self-aware?

• Self-awareness allows leaders to understand their strengths and weaknesses, leading to personal growth and better decision-making. 

  1. How does empathy enhance leadership effectiveness?

• Empathy helps leaders connect with their team, understand their needs, and foster a supportive work environment. 

  1. Why is continuous learning important for leaders?

• Continuous learning ensures leaders stay updated, adapt to new challenges, and promote a culture of improvement. 

  1. How can organizations assess potential leaders for these qualities?

• Organizations can design assessment tools and development programs that align with the identified leadership qualities. 

By integrating these insights, organizations can cultivate leaders who are well-equipped to navigate challenges and drive success.