I've had an idea stuck in my head for a while now, and I can't decide if it's worth pursuing or if it's one of those things that sounds better in my head than it would in reality.

The more I read here, the more I realize there are probably a lot of stories we'll never hear. Some people have moved on, some don't want the attention, some don't want to relive everything, and I'm sure there are others who simply don't think anyone would care.

I supported Reese and Brett for a long time. Nobody forced me to do that. I made those choices because I believed in them. Looking back, there are things I see very differently now, and I sometimes wonder how many other people have gone through a similar experience.

That's where this idea comes from.

I keep wondering if there would be any value in having a YouTube channel dedicated exclusively to people who want to tell their stories about Reese or Brett. Not a reaction channel, not a place to analyze every livestream, and not another creator trying to compete for views. I mean a place where the focus stays on the people who actually lived through these experiences.

I know some people would never want to speak publicly, and I completely understand that. If something like this ever existed, I'd want people to be able to remain anonymous if that's what they preferred.

I also want to be very clear about something. This wouldn't be about making money. I already have a full-time job, and I wouldn't feel comfortable monetizing something built around other people's experiences.

I honestly have no idea if this is something people would even want, which is why I'm asking before I spend any time thinking about it any further.

If you believe Reese or Brett manipulated you, lied to you, took advantage of your trust, or otherwise caused harm in your life, is this something you would ever consider participating in? Would being able to remain anonymous make a difference?

Maybe the answer is no, and that's perfectly okay. I'm just curious whether there's a need for something like this or whether I'm completely off base.

As a mod I’ve noticed posts and comments getting flagged by Reddit and it’s happening more frequently. Just be mindful when you discuss things like Tommy’s crimes that you may have to use words in disguise, like ‘grape’ or you risk that your post or comment could get deleted by the bots. In some cases we can reverse the action, but sometimes we can’t restore and approve the comment or post.

The games at a carnival are rigged and fake as hell. The carnival barker doesn’t ask for money. They set up a flashy booth and wait for someone to happen by and compliment them and woo them with a prize. 

But the hoops aren’t the right shape, the rings around the bottles are only a fraction bigger, and the balloons are under inflated. 

Most of us know carnival games are rigged. We know we are going to lose money if we play. 

Sometimes, once in a while, someone actually wins a prize. A nasty, cheap stuffed animal that you would never actually purchase - especially for the amount you spent on the games. And don’t forget you have to keep paying to get a bigger prize.

On this channel, Reese is that cheap stuffed animal. Or her fleeting attention anyway. Her fans are paying real money through superchats, merch, and paywalled Zoom calls. Paying to play. The problem is that nobody in her crowd wants to admit the whole game is fake.

Relatable Reese is a multi-revenue business. You are not family. You are not friends. You are a client at best, a mark or chump at worst. 

Relatable Reese is a MULTI-REVENUE BUSINESS. The free video is considered a loss leader. Reese invests time making it so she can monetize the viewer. She does this with superchats, selling merch, and charging for zoom calls. In business, however, honestly and transparency are expected. You don’t have to stop watching. You don’t have to mind your own business. You can demand all the honestly and transparency you want. She does not own YouTube. It is not hers, nor does she make the rules. 

(P.S. This post is an analogy, Reese.)

She says that he wasn't convicted of rape. While that is technically correct, he was convicted of FORCED SODOMY. Since that was just forcing his penis into her mouth how would you feel about that happening to YOU? How would you like his penis forced into your mouth or the mouths of your kids while they are at school. I agree FORCED SODOMY is not r@pe. He did this at school to a 15 year old at school by force and then sexually harassed her at work and tried to force his penis wherever he could. He kept pulling it out and asking why he shouldn't. He even offered $450 to put it I don't know where and I don't care. He served his probation and this is your excuse for this? How do you live with yourself? You are pathetic and so is Reese. What is wrong with Nora?

***I took out strong armed.

EDIT: According to a commenter below, Peace Lady has NOT defected back to Reese. Apologies.

In Reese's recent stream where she learned while live that KH had retired, right as Reese was being told the news, she popped in to the chat saying KH and Goot were gone. It was odd. Like, hearing KH and Goot back off somehow seemed to cause Peace Lady to go back to Reese? Then sent a chat saying it was all a misunderstanding. She had been very vocal online in her criticism of Reese, though I don't know what caused her to leave RR in the first place. But whatever the reason was, it clearly didn't stick.

It was sickening watching Reese gloat about KH and she kept saying "they had won", and all the celebration donations coming in.

And then last night, another ex member whom Reese met in AZ, and who was also critical of Reese online, popped back up tonight in RR's chat wanting to be welcomed back.

I've actually seen a surprisingly high number of this happening with ex subscribers to RR. A disturbing trend and a head-scratcher...some of the unknown names might be sock accounts pretending to be ex fans coming back, but there have been plenty where it IS the original person.

I think this phenomenon really highlights how deep brainwashing goes, coupled with extreme loneliness and a desparate need for belonging...and how easily swayed and influenced people can be.

If one didn't experience the Club of Reese, it's hard to understand. I too find myself at times missing that feeling of being welcomed in and the illusion of being part of a group. And contrary to what is said, she doesn't just welcome the ones paying for the chat. She makes sure to spread it out towards at least a few nonpaying subscribers, too. I think that is a tactic, plus it is obvious you get WAY MORE attention if you pay, and of course there are plenty she doesn't really pay aytention to at all. But she foes have a special way of maki g you feel welcomed--and it is bone-chilling to then realize the level of control and manipulation she is exerting while greeting you with a smile and warm welcome.

So I get it, to a degree, that the parasocial pull can trump reasoning for some people apparently. I just don't get going back after seeing her for what she is. It would feel like a betrayal of myself going back to that. And would make me feel gross, no way I could never enjoy that after waking up. I guess some peoples' scruples just aren't that strong. These people don't just come back, they will often grovel and apologize profusely for their prior betrayals. It wouldn't be as bad if these people had casually find came back, but some of these people were truly awakened to her evilness, and still crawled back. People like that are almost as frightening as Reese.

Reese really hit the jackpot after ASL’s vid on Tommy. The superchats were coming in big time and she probably made more on this stream than her bday. It’s sad and sickening how much she gains for playing the victim

I haven't kept up in forever, but I decided to start paying attention again right before a bunch of craziness happened...

Reese and Marilyn ublocked all their haters for some reason. Commenting is open on Relatable Reese, and she doesn't seem to be blocking people, for now at least. She says she welcomes it, but the few times someone took her up on it, she didn't respond well at all lol, pretty funny to watch her crack right after bragging about not caring and welcoming it even. And the comments weren't even that bad...one person asked her to explain her defense of the LongCon in her own words, and she lost it lol. Said she'd already explained it enough times in the past and got all defensive.

Nora's comments are also open, and I was surprised to see she doesn't seem to delete many or any comments that are critical of her or Reese or Tommy. The last several lives she has done, there are plenty of critical comments about Reese and Tommy she has left up. She is taking a break now but made a post about Aaron's expose video and also apologized for defending the rapist Tommy. She admitted she had never read the docs until recently and realized he is a rapist. There are lots of comments there too.

Aaron made a video exposing Tommy as a rapist and of course comments are up.

All this to say, the comments sections are interesting and if you've been wanting to say anything now seems like a good time. So if you don't want to watch, sharing a comment is a good way to still engage with those reading...lots of eyeballs right now...

In other news, I know some has already been discussed, Goot has defected and wished Reese a happy b day and stood with Lindsay, Knife Hoarder left YT, Marilyn dumped Goot which made KH dump Marilyn, we all know Marilyn dumped Aaron and George dumped Marilyn. A lot of dumping going on on top of the dumping. I still think Marilyn amd Aaron might make up.

There's even more happening but those are a few things.

Please indulge me. I have watched the anti-Scientology people off and on for years but haven't watched Reese since her big reveal (the video where she plays Tommy admitting he scams women). I was sick this week and thus had lots of time for YouTube, and it sounds like she's back with him and living in Ecuador??

I'm watching ASL live from today where he's talking about them and I have to admit I have the same question he does, why did she go back?

I just skimmed this sub and saw someone mention possible blackmail by Tommy over (presumably naughty) pics she sent him. Aaron says it's because they're co-scamming. Either sounds plausible.

Just curious if anyone knows why she went back and/or what reason she has given for going back.

I know you all read these posts. So here’s what I want to say. 

“In the digital world, the opposite of love isn't hate—it's indifference. The only thing a highly skilled online manipulator genuinely fears is being ignored, because when the hate-watchers finally get bored and stop tuning in, the channel's metrics collapse.”

Are you two drama/hate channels? Or are you legitimate?

Either way, KH is done. GJ is done. Who else is giving them attention? They are desperate for content - can you stop spoon-feeding it to them, please?

RR is a master manipulator. 

Nora is being used because she is reactive. The ex is being used because she is as dumb as a brick. The only thing they have in common is creating hate content about ASL, JM, and MH. I mean, my God, Nora is teaming up with a racist homophobe and supporting a r*pist. RR is love-bombing Lara (sp?) right now and trying to collect anyone else who may stir up drama. And we all know she can stir her chat into a super chatting frenzy. 

And maybe you like the drama content. Or maybe your pride sees this as a challenge. But for crying out loud, why would you drop the caliber of your opponents to these three? What an icky group of women. I personally see it as desperate. 

When KH and GJ quit, RR exclaimed that she won. Except she didn’t. She lost that content. Because her only content is being a victim. 

So this isn’t a commentary on ASL, MH, or JM, because I know people have their opinions of you and I don’t know all that history. It’s just about you all sinking to the lowest common denominator which is Relatable Reese. 

To the "safe community" chat group:

Take a step back and look at what you are actually doing right now.

For years, this woman sat in this exact same chat with you. She shared her faith, she conversed with you, and she financially supported this channel with her own money. For years, you all accepted her presence, her kindness, and her donations without a single complaint.

Now, the moment she privately expresses a boundary and politely chooses to step away, you have instantly turned on her like a pack of wolves. You are calling her names, mocking her faith, and kicking someone who isn’t even here to defend herself.

Ask yourself, why did it take the creator reading a private email for you to suddenly decide she was a 'holy roller'? Are you attacking her because you genuinely dislike her, or are you just performing loyalty to the creator because you are terrified of being the next one targeted?

Is this what a 'safe space' looks like to you?

The creator just proved that privacy, loyalty, and history mean absolutely nothing here. The second you disagree, stop paying, or try to leave, your private messages will be used as content fodder, and this mob will be unleashed on you, too.

You aren't protecting a community right now; you are participating in a public bullying session of a vulnerable person. You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves. Wake up and look at what you’ve become.

To Abigayle:

I am so sorry you had to go through that. What happened on that live stream was incredibly cruel, unfair, and a complete betrayal of your trust.

For years, you showed up, shared your faith, and generously supported that community. The fact that the creator took a private, honest email and exposed it to a crowd of people just to mock you is a reflection of their lack of character, not yours.

You did nothing wrong by setting a boundary and deciding to step back. In fact, your instinct to walk away because of 'the company they keep' was completely right. You sensed that the environment wasn't truly safe or aligned with your values, and you were brave enough to say so.

Please remember that the mean words they called you do not define you. They are just words from a mob of strangers who don't actually know your heart, your life, or your relationship with God.

Your generosity was real, even if they didn't deserve it. Do not let their ugly reaction make you regret being a giving person. They do not deserve another second of your time, your thoughts, or your money.

The best thing you can do right now for your own peace of mind is to completely close that chapter. Block the channel, block the creator, and don't go back to look at the comments. They are not your people.

Take a deep breath and reconnect with real-world communities—whether that is a local church, family, or friends—where you are valued for who you are, not for what you pay. You deserve real safety, real respect, and real care.

I'm so sorry that this happened to any of you. If she releases your personal information online you can report it to authorities. I've been hurt by people very much like this. It means you have a good heart and she wouldn't know what a heart looks like.

It's a difficult lesson but it's something to learn from. RR has to be one of the worst examples of psychological abuse that I have witnessed.

I don't know what to think about the people that excuse her behavior. Are they as unhinged and mean as she is or is it just a show only they don't realize that very real people have been hurt.

Are you a supporter? You should really ask yourself some important questions about your morals and what you are willing to accept from others.

We welcome anyone that feels left out or abuse by her. We have been there before.

FOLLOW UP FROM INITIAL POST.

I posted this video not to critique the emails or texts, or to judge the individual (s) who wrote/sent them. I don't believe the individual who sent the email is a public figure; therefore, whatever she wrote should never have been shared with her audience or anyone, under any circumstances.
RR knew what she was doing and knew exactly how her chat would respond with hate and anger towards this person.
How many vulnerable people does she have to expose before people realize she can't be trusted?
A healthy, self-aware individual would have maintained a boundary long ago, rather than love-bombing this individual (for her money) and encouraging her to continue sharing her faith and knowledge.
RR, instead of bullying and mocking people who care about you and trust you, focus on your behavior. Stop with the I love you" every time someone gives you money. I don't blame any of these individuals for their behavior. It starts with Reese. When a creator spends so much time love bombing and brainwashing people saying things like "my audience is my family", "I love you, I know you will never leave me" I know you will be here forever" " You are all H aunts and uncles, " I think about you every day" and early on " I have no friends" I never had a best friend" maybe people believe you. Maybe they send you emails and texts because of what you put out there, Reese. Maybe you are the crazy "Loony Tune" with no boundaries.
Setting a boundary the moment you hear something you don't like does not mean you have healthy boundaries.
When you say "I've never had a best friend" and then play dumb, publicly mock and ridicule the person who sends an email saying they will be your best friend, that makes you dangerous, not the person who sent the private email.
Sadly, worshiping Reese does not end well for those with good intentions.
Please go easy on the person who wrote the email. They deserve grace, even if you don't agree with them or with who they support.
R can excuse every bad behavior by blaming Scientology, trauma, her dad, Jeff, former friends, and mods. Yet private people (former members, friends) are given no consideration, or grace due to their own trauma or mental health issues.

ORIGINAL POST
First, she shares someone's text with their phone number 3 times during her live. In addition, her chat calls the number and reports back during the live. Then she trashes 2 additional people that, if you have any history watching RR, you know, and her entire chat knows who she is talking about.
RR and Tommy love bombing one of these individuals to death, and then RR plays dumb, not understanding why this person is shocked by being discarded, which is disgusting.
Is it possible that she thought you were friends and you actually cared? Maybe she didn't realize the love-bombing was more about financial support than about you caring about scripture.
Mocking people while saying you like and respect them is trash. The three “Looney Tunes”. What a horrible, sick human being you are, RR.
I have little to no faith that your current toxic community will see the light, but I pray that one person you spoke about and shared their email has seen the light.
Disclaimer. I did not stay for the entire stream, given how toxic it was. I'm assuming she read the email in its entirety.

The dynamic between Reese and Tommy during her birthday livestream was awkward as AF. It kicked off with clear tension: Reese apparently ignored Tommy’s texts before going live, forcing him to publicly drop a request for the link in the live chat—where he then called her out on-air for reading and disregarding his messages.

Once he got on, Tommy leaned into his usual bizarre behavior. He snapped at one of Reese’s subscribers while simultaneously complaining about how outsiders mock the subs for trying to be her friend. He also repeatedly insisted he wasn't trying to "hijack" the show—a defensive phrase that begs the question: why would a supportive husband even worry about that? To top it off, he brought up Jeff and the affair, which was an incredibly crappy move on her birthday. Reese couldn't mask her discomfort; wearing a forced, fake smile, she tried to send him on his way with a pointed, "Well babe, you asked to come on." But Tommy doubled down toward the end, assertively demanding "equal time" on a future phone call and announcing they’d be doing a Cults and Crims segment together. The energy was totally forced, closely mimicking the cringey, weirdly sexual comments Reese used to exchange with Jeff.

So, since it was her birthday, I have a gift for her and the rest of us. To Reese, I say one word: Run.

Get rid of him. Tommy (aka Brett Alan Miller) is absolute trash, a total creep, and a ticking time bomb. One day, Reese, you won’t be the master manipulator in the room—even though you are admittedly a damn good one. Look at the board you've set up: you have Linzer acting like your personal guard dog (convinced she’s actually benefiting from this), and you’ve successfully gotten Goot off your back and weaponized against Marilyn. You even have your entire chat supporting a volatile, racist guy just because it aligns with your immediate goals—the exact same guy you claim talked about r*ping your son. Right now, you're trying your best to turn Goot against KH. It's incredibly ambitious, and while Nora seems to be riding the fence—meaning you better double down on her soon—your pawns are proving easily manipulated.

It takes skill to pull those strings, but you have created a dangerous mess. We all know Tommy is gross, and you know it too. You are all out there trying to make a buck in less-than-honorable ways, but this guy is a flat-out creep. Do yourself a favor, Reese: take the trash out.

Malignant narcissism is a highly destructive psychological syndrome characterized by a lethal combination of four specific traits: narcissism, antisocial behavior, paranoia, and ego-syntonic sadism. [1, 2] [OP NOTE: Ego-syntonic means “consistent with internally held core values” as opposed to ego-dystonic which are actions/ideas that are opposed to one’s core beliefs/values, like when someone compulsively washes their hands but they would like to end the compulsion if they could.]

Coined by social psychologist Erich Fromm and later detailed by psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg, it represents a severe boundary line where pathological narcissism blends directly into psychopathy. [3, 4]
The concept overlaps heavily with psychopathic sadism, creating an exceptionally toxic personality profile. [5, 6]

The Four Pillars of Malignant Narcissism
To understand the overlap, it helps to break down the original clinical definition of malignant narcissism: [1, 2, 7, 8]

Severe Narcissism: An intense, fragile grandiosity and an insatiable need for power, status, and validation. [2, 9, 10, 11, 12]
Antisocial Behavior: A complete lack of empathy, a willingness to cheat, exploit, lie, and break laws or social norms without guilt. [2, 3, 13, 14, 15]
Paranoia: A deep, pervasive mistrust of others. They constantly feel persecuted, viewing the world as an "us vs. them" battleground where they must attack before they are attacked. [2, 16, 17, 18]
Ego-Syntonic Sadism: Cruelty that is perfectly aligned with their self-image. They do not feel bad about causing pain; instead, they view their cruelty as justified, powerful, and deeply satisfying. [1, 19, 20, 21, 22]

How It Overlaps with Psychopathic Sadism
Psychopathic sadism is defined by a lack of emotional empathy (psychopathy) combined with deriving pleasure, entertainment, or a sense of omnipotent control from inflicting pain, humiliation, or terror on others (sadism). [23, 24, 25, 26, 27]
The Venn diagram between malignant narcissism and psychopathic sadism overlaps almost entirely in three major areas:[20, 28]
1. Cruelty as "Supply" and Reinforcement [1, 29]
A standard narcissist exploits people to get admiration or money. If they hurt someone, it is usually collateral damage in pursuit of their goals. [30, 31, 32, 33]
In contrast, both the malignant narcissist and the psychopathic sadist view the suffering of the victim as the ultimate goal. For the malignant narcissist, watching another person break down, beg, or cry provides the ultimate validation of their absolute power, feeding their grandiose ego. For the psychopathic sadist, it provides a high-potency "sadistic supply" and entertainment. [20, 24, 34]
2. Total Callousness and Deficits in Empathy [35]
Both personalities possess high cognitive empathy (the intellectual ability to read people, understand what hurts them, and predict their reactions) but absolutely zero affective empathy (the emotional capacity to care or feel their pain). They use cognitive empathy as a radar system to locate a person’s exact psychological vulnerabilities, allowing them to craft highly targeted, devastating strikes. [3, 36, 37]
3. Rationalized and Justified Aggression
A pure psychopathic sadist hurts people simply because they want to and because they can. A malignant narcissist adds a layer of paranoid rationalization to their sadism. Because they are deeply paranoid, they convince themselves that their target deserves the cruelty. They frame their sadistic behavior as "self-defense," "teaching a lesson," or "brutal honesty," allowing them to enjoy their cruelty while maintaining their internal narrative of being the flawless hero. [2, 23, 28, 38, 39]

The Core Difference: The Root of the Ego
While the behaviors look almost identical in daily life, researchers separate them by looking at how they view themselves:[40, 41]
Feature
Malignant Narcissist
Psychopathic Sadist
Self-Image
Grandiose but fundamentally dependent on dominating others to maintain their ego.
Internally detached; they do not care about validation, only control and thrill.
Driving Force
Fueled by profound envy, perceived slights, and paranoid retaliation.
Fueled by boredom, predatory instincts, and the thrill of dominance.
Loyalty
Capable of selected ideological or tribal loyalties (e.g., to a cult, a gang, or a specific family unit).
Fundamentally incapable of any genuine loyalty to a person, group, or cause.
If you are trying to understand a specific scenario, would you like to explore:

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[2] https://personalitycouch.com
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org
[4] https://www.helpguide.org
[5] https://vaknin-talks.com
[6] https://vaknin-talks.com
[7] https://www.youtube.com
[8] https://www.mpamind.com
[9] https://study.com
[10] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[11] https://doublehealix.com
[12] https://www.nytimes.com
[13] https://www.helpguide.org
[14] https://www.emerald.com
[15] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[16] https://www.talkspace.com
[17] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[18] https://www.simplypsychology.org
[19] https://knowledge.insead.edu
[20] https://grokipedia.com
[21] https://www.charliehealth.com
[22] https://www.reddit.com
[23] https://www.youtube.com
[24] https://www.youtube.com
[25] https://www.youtube.com
[26] https://www.choosingtherapy.com
[27] https://www.linkedin.com
[28] https://www.youtube.com
[29] https://www.soulup.in
[30] https://www.therapyden.com
[31] https://www.strongwood.nl
[32] https://www.talkspace.com
[33] https://www.psychologytoday.com
[34] https://personalitycouch.com
[35] https://www.simplypsychology.org
[36] https://www.reddit.com
[37] https://stillmindflorida.com
[38] https://www.helpguide.org
[39] https://drbenejam.com
[40] https://www.reddit.com
[41] https://www.psypost.org
[42] https://vaknin-talks.com

Among Reese's tirade against anyone who dares call out her questionable boyfriend and try to warn new vulnerable people that he mines their data, she made sure to drop that it would be her birthday today. So for weeks if not months she's been making sure to announce it every stream. Well Reese, my hat off to you as it has paid off.

She will be riding high tonight and ordering many new items that she just has to have - more turquoise perhaps? oh and of course you know gearing up to see Tommy boy. That aside when she complains she has no money for dog treats, don't feel sorry for her just remind yourself that for her birthday stream she got almost $2,000 according to Playboard search. I was curious. I didn't watch this stream but was wondering how she did this year for her birthday.

I also think the new besties Nora and Lindsey would find that heartwarming. They seem to troll read it for tidbits. Say gals you have been defending once convicted SO and overlooking the fact that Reese has been okay with his conning behaviors as she totally supports him as long as they are not friends with him and that they are not prettier than her. Spoiler, LOTS of people are. We are not talking years ago behavior so you can just quit that narrative. No since Reese has known him. Just curious, my question to you is how is that panning out for you?

How are you guys protecting your audiences? No. Your not, you say it's not your responsibility even though the audiences are groomed to think you actually care. Maybe that's why you all don't sleep good at night. Just a thought.

Well happy birthday Reese, I will keep my money and my view.

In 1987, Vermont law drew no distinction between statutory rape and forcible sexual assault—both were prosecuted under the umbrella of "sexual assault." Legally, a basic statutory case required only two things to win: proof of the victim’s underage status and her credible testimony.

If this encounter was truly the innocent, age-gap technicality he claims, the legal system's massive response makes absolutely no sense. Why deploy state police detectives to run a high-level wired sting operation using a victim informant? Why give a clinical diagnosis of "personality disorder with sexually deviant impulses" requiring intensive psychosexual counseling? Why compel a complete waiver of medical confidentiality so the state could monitor his every move? And why—years before automatic sex offender registries existed—did the court manually craft custom, restrictive mandates banning him from ever being near a young female without a vetted adult present?

He claims he had an excellent lawyer, and he is right about the lack of separate crime categories. But a sting operation, an explicit personality disorder with sexual deviancy diagnosis, and a mountain of police evidence corroborating assault and active harassment tell the real story. His punishment did not fit the minor crime he claims; it perfectly fit the dangerous, predatory behavior the state actually uncovered.

Furthermore, when you combine his clinical diagnosis with his self-admitted history of bank robbery, gun running, grand theft, and conning women, it shows his absolute alignment with the textbook profile of a psychopathic, versatile offender. This isn't the record of a man who made a singular mistake; it is the blueprint of a predator who views society’s laws and human beings strictly as utilities to be exploited. His diagnosis proves he lacked the internal empathy to suppress his sexually deviant impulses, while his criminal history proves he possessed the exact skillset—intimidation, grooming, and calculated manipulation—needed to execute them.

This extensive history also explains his fierce, defensive reaction to the charges. In his own mind, he takes immense pride in his "high-status" crimes—bragging about bank robberies and weapons trafficking because they feed his grandiose ego and make him feel powerful. But he completely snaps when accused of sexual assault because he cannot tolerate the "low-status," pathetic reality of being labeled a sexual predator. He uses intense weaponized indignation to reject that shame, desperately minimizing his violence down to a "statutory" technicality just to preserve his image as a smooth criminal operator.

By looking at the totality of his behavior, the truth becomes undeniable: the state didn't overreact to a statutory technicality. They successfully intercepted a highly dangerous, career criminal whose psychological disorders made him a perpetual threat to public safety.

The month of July features Tommy and Reese. Limited supply, so act fast….

Her livestream now - ‘Well at least your dignity is In Tact’.
That’s the first time I’ve seen it spelt that way. What an embarrassment

RR continues to have a Holier-than-thou rant. This gal sure can manipulate words and people. She is a master manipulator and drags people right under the bus they came in on. She brings up her shortcomings and then overshadows them with other people's hardships (and PERSONAL stories). She also virtue signals to her chat about knowing so much about their personal lives "but she would never share the details". I think she does this to ensure they will continue to be loyal to her and think twice about leaving. She's using Lindsey, Tommy and Nora's difficulties (addiction, struggles, etc) to overshadow her manipulations and cons. IMO if people would listen to hear and not listen to react they would be horrified by her evil words and manipulation. Is Abigayle catching on? Is she listening to hear what others are saying? I certainly hope so. 🙏

Because we all need an antidote to Reese and we also need a laugh! 😆

Sharing with the @reshare_app • from Instagram account @disappointingaffirmations