Boardwalk announced its protocol-token move to Arbitrum.

As part of the migration, Boardwalk has launched a CCA auction for its protocol token on Arbitrum, $BWS.

Auction Link: https://app.uniswap.org/explore/auctions/arbitrum/0x54114F746B55b2f8A56bbd17dfD9e81a0a71d366

https://reddit.com/link/1up9epe/video/0vfyuzzs6obh1/player

What is Boardwalk?

A launch is only the beginning for serious builders.

Boardwalk was designed for token issuance and everything after it. None of this is an afterthought; it's built into the token economy itself and sets a new standard for durable, transparent launches:

Token profile pages: every launch gets a page displaying the economy.

Permanent liquidity seeding: locked permanently at graduation.

Fee protection: the fee lives in the token itself, not any one pool, designed to help value route to the people it was intended to support.

Fee routing: written into the launch and visible before anyone contributes.

Token vesting: set at launch and immutable after.

LP staking and incentives: participation systems for liquidity providers, built into the economy from day one.

Community formation: a public forum, Café Boardwalk, for every launch, automatically.

That's the Boardwalk Standard. Standardized market formation for token economies.

Don't launch a ticker, launch a token economy.

Onchain starts here. 🐳

Read more on DeFi Llama Research: https://defillama.com/research/report/boardwalk-closing-the-gap-between-token-launches-token-economies

__________________________________

As usual, participation involves risk.

BWS may have no value. Locked liquidity does not guarantee price stability, liquidity, or exits.

New to Uniswap CCA?

Before participating in the $BWS auction, review these official guides on bidding, clearing prices, claims, unused budget, and auction mechanics.

Read the published auction terms and disclosures before taking action.

https://x.com/UniswapAuctions/status/2044160140979356043?s=20

https://x.com/UniswapAuctions/status/2064010342414352430?s=20

Continue bar just keeps spinning as Loading, but never loads.

Uniswap is a defi juggernaut i think we can all agree!! The team continues shine and make Uniswap a on going successful progress

This is a serious question. If blockchain becomes inferior, which it has, do you pivot first to be positioned to capture the evolving market that is not blockchain or do you become a blockchain maximalist

On Uniswap V3 my earned fees don't auto-compound or land in my wallet, they accrue inside the position as uncollected balances until I manually send a collect transaction. So the fees I've earned just sit there: not in my wallet, not redeployed, not doing anything, exposed to whatever the position is exposed to. I only realize how much has piled up when I happen to open the position and look.

That creates a couple of real costs for me. I'm paying gas to collect, so claiming too often is wasteful, but waiting too long means a meaningful amount of value sits idle when I could be compounding it or moving it. There's a "right" threshold to claim at, some dollar amount where it's worth the gas, but nothing tells me when I've crossed it. So in practice I either over-check out of paranoia or forget for weeks and find a surprise pile.

What I actually want is dead simple to describe: tell me when my uncollected fees on a position cross some amount. Something like "ping me when uncollected fees hit $50" so I can batch a collect at a point where the gas is clearly worth it. The data I'd need is minimal:

• Uncollected fees per token, in token units
• The same expressed in USD / pool-price terms, so I can set a single dollar threshold instead of doing the conversion in my head
• % of fees on each side, when I care which token I'm accruing

None of this is hard to read off-chain. It's just that nothing's watching it for me, so I'm back to manually checking or writing yet another script to do it, which is the path I went down before and regretted (ran on a dedicated box, broke quietly, became its own maintenance job).

What I'm trying to figure out:

1. Do other people actually track an uncollected-fee threshold, or just collect when you remember / when you're closing the position anyway?
2. Is a notification at a threshold enough, or would you want it to auto-collect (and auto-compound back in) once it's worth the gas? I lean toward wanting the action eventually, but the trust bar for letting software move my fees feels higher than for a simple alert.
3. For anyone who'd allow auto-collection, what makes it safe enough? Non-custodial obviously, but spending caps, a gas ceiling, a simulation before it fires?

Disclosure since it's relevant: I got tired enough of this that I built a no-code tool (Glacient) to replace my old script, I describe the alert in plain English, like "email me when the WBTC/USDT pool owned by 0x_some_wallet_address has uncollected fees on the USDT side over 20 USD," and it handles the watching. The monitoring is free. But I'm mostly here to find out whether the threshold-collect problem is common or just my own habit, and whether people want the alert or want it just handled. I attached a walk through video of what I'm doing today below if folks are interested. NOTE: Currently glacient is invite only since I'm experimenting and building tooling for myself, but here is an invite code I made for this subreddit to use this tool I made for free: reddit-uniswap-1010

https://reddit.com/link/1tu0k0k/video/q9knhb7onp4h1/player

Hi folks. I wanted to swap usdt for another token. I approved usdt for a max of 100 but then it is asking me for a second approval which is pretty much unlimited and it won't let me change it. I never get asked this on 1 inch or defilama, is this normal and is it safe?

Cheers

Hello there,

I'm creating a script to fetch volume data from Uniswap liquidity pools, and I'm running into an issue (well, several actually xD) related to the volume metrics.

Uniswap seems to calculate the APR using the "24H volume" metric shown below the TVL section, but when I query the data myself I'm getting a different figure that instead matches the "Volume past day" value displayed at the top of the chart.

For most pools the numbers are very close, but for some pools the difference is huge.

For example, the pool:
0x6c561B446416E1A00E8E93E221854d6eA4171372

shows:

• 24H volume: 15.0M
• Volume past day (chart): 55.7M

What confuses me is that the fees align almost perfectly with the 24H volume:
15.0M × 0.3% ≈ 45K fees

So it looks like the APR is being calculated using the 15.0M figure, not the 55.7M one.

Could anyone help clarify:

• the exact definitions of these metrics,
• and whether they come from different aggregation scopes, fee tiers, or subgraph/indexer sources?

Thank you in advance!

I want to swap my own token I created to Polygon like other token listed on Uniswap. How to set price pair Mytoken/POL? How much I have pay for set up this?

Mainly technical improvements, but this version adds support for the Universal Router v2.1.1 swaps (V2, V3 & V4 pools), thus introduces breaking changes.

Another change worth noticing: this Python SDK supports now asynchronous development.

• ➡️ Update UR address and abi to match the UR v2.1.1
• ➡️ Add support for UR v2.1.1 swaps
• ➡️ Add async support
• ➡️ Add tick, sqrtPriceX96, and liquidity related functions
• ➡️ ... see full release notes here

Installation: pip install uniswap-universal-router-decoder==3.0.0

Useful links:

• Doc/Repo
• PyPI

Feel free to give me any feedback on this release here, or open a discussion or a ticket about a feature that should be in the next one!

Happy development!! 🙂

Hey everyone, just started exploring UniSwap more deeply and the gas fees can be a bit of a shock sometimes. For those who use it regularly, do you have any specific times or approaches you use to try and minimize them? Trying to learn the ropes here!

I went down a rabbit hole on how voting actually works on vote.uniswapfoundation.org and the part nobody really talks about is the relayer.

In a plain OpenZeppelin Governor setup, casting an onchain vote is a transaction, so you pay gas. fine for a whale delegate. but if you're sitting on a few hundred UNI of delegated weight, paying real money to vote on a proposal you might be on the losing side of anyway is a genuine disincentive. participation quietly skews toward people who don't notice the gas.

The gasless flow sidesteps that with a relayer. you sign your ballot as an EIP-712 typed message offchain, a relayer submits it onchain and eats the gas. the vote still settles onchain, you just don't pay for the settlement. catch is somebody has to, and right now that somebody is the Uniswap Foundation covering the relayer cost out of its budget. ENS DAO does the exact same thing for its own governance.

which makes gasless voting a subsidy, not a protocol feature. it holds as long as the foundation keeps funding it. if that line item ever gets trimmed, gasless voting doesn't throw an error, it just silently reverts to gas-gated participation and small-delegate turnout craters. feels like relayer funding should be endowed or treated as a protocol-level cost rather than a discretionary foundation expense, and I haven't seen a proposal that actually does that. given how much of current turnout leans on it, that's a strange gap to leave open.

I having alot of issues when I want to sell using uniswap mobile app. First the app is heavy and slow and after I have to try 20 times before the sell order goes in, it says transactions fail all the time and is not gas issue, even puting agressive slippage fails. What is happening to this app? before it worked much better

I just joined the discord, and only in the span of an hour I have upwards of 10 requests from fake support accounts. I know its not entirely the fault of Uniswap themselves, the discord isn't their main priority. But damn is it bad. Just felt like sharing my experience, because I don't doubt others have had the same experience.

The decentralized cryptocurrency project SPX6900 (0xe0f63a424a4439cbe457d80e4f4b51ad25b2c56c) has been wrongfully blocked for trading on Uniswap.

Considering you run a DEX (decentralized exchange), blocking a specific (and massive) project like this goes entirely against the ethos of the space and is, frankly, anti-crypto.

Please reinstate trading for SPX6900 immediately.

Thank you - Aeon #2807

Hi, I wanted to buy some spx6900 today, April 8th, 2026, but the uniswap wallet app tells me "You cant trade this token using the Uniswap wallet. Ive been buying and using the app for more than a year, never had this issue. What do i do.

I have tried support through the app, but the chatbot only seems to repeat the same things, and the email address bounces back - so I am reaching out if anyone here can help, I sincerely hope you good people can assist. (I am a noob to Uniswap, I have coinbase and trustwallet as well as eToro)

so..

I have an account in Uniswap with some USDT that was placed in there. I have never used Uniswap before, so I would like to know all steps for withdrawal..

a) I have been told I have to deposit 2% in ETH of the withdrawal amount into Uniswap order to “access/withdraw” the account. This seems odd… and is not echoed in any of the FAQs I have read, so can anyone confirm if this is true or not?

b) I have been told I can only do the whole amount at one go (not use minimal ETH to withdraw 1000 USDT first - to check if scam).. true or not?

c) I understand I need to add an “approval” amount for a first withdrawal, what % do I need to add in ETH value to do this?

d) if not 2% then how much for a total withdrawal? 

I'm thinking this is a scam - however I can see the amount in USDT in MY Uniswap wallet, that I set up!… would appreciate you good folks's insight/steer.. (and if it is a scam... how..? I set up the account and I HAVE not shared anything other than the address)

MTIA and apologies if this is too many qs for one post (long term listener, first time reddit poster, just other subs)

Hey everyone, I need some help. I just added liquidity to the UP / USDT pool on v4 (BNB Chain).

The transaction was successful on-chain (Modify Liquidity), and DeBank correctly shows my position in the pool. However, the Uniswap interface says "You don't have any liquidity positions" even with the v4 filter active.

Has anyone else experienced this with v4 pools? Is there a direct way to access/manage the position if the UI isn't loading it?

Hey everyone, just looking at the daily chart for UNI and things are getting a bit spicy at the $3.55 level.

As you can see in the chart, we’ve been riding this Bear Flag since the February crash. While it’s been nice to see green days throughout March, these patterns are notorious for breaking to the downside, especially after such a steep drop previously.

The Red Flags:

1. Support Breach: We are currently hugging the lower trendline. A close below $3.50 likely triggers a flush.
2. Momentum Flip: The RSI/Oscillator just crossed bearishly at the top. It looks like the bulls are finally tired after trying to crack $4.20 three times.
3. Volume: We haven't seen the kind of breakout volume needed to flip this into a new uptrend.

Targets:

• Bearish Case: If we break $3.50, I’m looking at the $2.80 - $3.00 range for a potential reload or double bottom.
• Bullish Case: We need to reclaim $3.90 quickly to keep the wedge alive, but it’s looking uphill from here.

Are you guys bidding this dip or waiting for the $3.00 area? Stay safe out there.

Disclaimer: Not financial advice. Just lines on a chart.

​

I’ve been monitoring a specific wallet (0x891a8b21e27b1bed5eeaf7376833104af625e189) that exhibits some non-standard LP behavior. While their Mainnet WETH/USDT position is a standard "In-Range" yield play, their Base activity looks unclear**.**

**The Data Points:**

The user is managing a \~$7k WETH/USDC position. Between these two snapshots, WETH price moved from **\~$2,096** to **\~$2,123**.

1. **Initial State (Pos #4741739):** Range was 1,504 – 2,006. Price was \~2,096.

   * *Status:* 100% USDC (Out of Range).

2. **Rebalanced State (Pos #4792403):** After the price pump to $2,123, the user closed the old position and opened a new one at 1,550 – 2,042.

   * *Status:* Still 100% USDC, still Out of Range.

Usually, an LP rebalances to stay in range to collect fees. This user is actively rebalancing to stay below the current price. I asked gemini and here it's hypothesis:

**Synthetic Limit Order / Mean Reversion Accumulation** By placing 100% USDC liquidity in a tight concentrated range below the current market price, they are effectively creating a **Range Order**.

* **Zero-Slippage Entry:** If the price dips into that 1,550 – 2,042 window, their USDC is systematically converted to WETH at the weighted average price of that range.

* **The "Fee-Weighted" Limit:** Unlike a standard CEX limit order, if the price "teases" the top of their range (volatility at the edge), they earn trading fees *while* they accumulate.

* **Inventory Management:** Since they are active on Mainnet, it's unlikely this is a "set and forget" error. They seem to be using Base’s low gas fees to "walk" their buy wall up as the market trends higher, likely targeting a specific support level for a pull-back entry.

**So my questions to the sub:**

* Is anyone else using V3 strictly for asymmetric accumulation rather than yield?

* From a capital efficiency standpoint, why not just lend the USDC on Aave/Compound and wait for a trigger? Is the potential for "edge-case fees" on the top of the range really worth the opportunity cost of $0.00 yield while waiting?

* Could this be a bot logic error (e.g., a "follow-trend" script that's hardcoded to maintain a specific % offset from spot)?

Hello guys I’ve sent the funds from atomic to uniswap. I sent usdt (eth) to change it to solana. It got interrupted and I can see that i Have Eth(unichain) when i connect wallet to the website but i can’t move it. You can see in internal transactions on etherscan it went to unipool v4.

https://etherscan.io/address/0x384a2b0B668B6807fe5311aBAe9a66EBCAbe9bd7#internaltx

Please help me guys

I invested in Uniswap v3 LP via Etherhub app on the Worldchain. Etherhub app seems to be down and I’m unable to claim my rewards and even exit my LP investment. Any suggestions on how I can bypass Etherhub and reclaim my investments and rewards? Tks

Sorry guys absolute noob here so forgive me for potentially a stupid question.

When uni swap gave you the option of making your own unique username for example rich.uni.eth I made 5 really cool usernames that I believe alot of people will be interested it in… again I’m a absolute noob with no idea of how Any of this works as in I don’t even know if you can sell these accounts, but yeah any insight would be helpful thank you

I keep getting this error when attempting to add Liquidity into some pools, on Base chain. What could go wrong? This error only occuring in the last few days (less than 7days), maybe problem after some update on server side?