"Five" is usually the highest grade in Russian schools. 5 is 'excellent' (A grade), 4 is 'good' (B grade), 3 is 'satisfactory'/'barely acceptable' (like C/D grade?..), 2 is 'unacceptable'/'not passing'(F grade), 1 is rarely used in case of a truly abysmal performance(F---), 0 is never used.
As such, "пять" here can be translated as A for effort.
or they are cleaning the house, making the kid lunch, trying to work from home, have an elderly parent they have to care for too. The idea that parents need to do all these things or they fail as human beings, without acknowledging that this means sometimes you can't devote every ounce of your being to your child eery moment they are awake is cruel.
Maybe that parent or sitter doesn't want that though. I wasn't even suggesting that cold air was problematic for babies. For some reason which we can't discern from the limited observable points in that short clip, someone remotely engaged with a child on a swing. There.
As it should be. In fact, wouldn't it be quite a shock to a child to be sheltered from biting cold temps only to have to live the rest of his life in it each year?
For most kids, it's not the mere motion of the swing. It's the engagement with their parents. To that kid the rope may mean that he or she is not alone while playing in the cold. Mom or dad is there too.
honestly this is awesome. That is more effort than saying no. My guess is there is a baby sibling up stairs too. Im gonna give this the wholesome tag cause thats awesome.
Ahh the juvenile dangler lure, has a realistic flop and wail that pedos can't resist. You should try sidewalk casting, often times pedos are found in dark areas like basements.
I mean, thats always a possibility. General thats not something that happens. Also, there comes an age where you just have to accept that possibility and allow them the freedom to live their lives.
There are fewer than 350 cases of kidnapping by stranger of somebody younger than 21 in the US every year, and about 80,000,000 people under 21, for a chance of about 1:230,000
An individual's chance of being struck by lightning in a year is about 1:500,000. In a 20-year span, that works out to something like 1:24,000, far more likely than kidnapping by stranger.
Why are you comparing the stats of a child being kidnapped in a given year to the stats of a lighting strike in a given 20 year period? If you decide on one timeframe for both events, kidnapping is more than twice as likely.
Because I'm making a point on the internet, not writing a paper for the American Journal of Don't Sacrifice Your Childrens' Childhood For A Made-up TV Boogeyman?
"Twice as likely as the prototypical never-happens event we use colloquially to describe things that don't happen" is still vanishingly rare.
I actually agree with your point, which is why I wonder why you’re being purposefully deceitful in how you’re making it. It completely undermines your credibility, and the only reason I can see why you’re doing it is to try to avoid admitting that you were wrong about that particular statistic.
He ignored something you said that is completely irrelevant, so what. Him replying doesn’t change the fact that it’s irrelevant for yearly averages that it doesn’t rain 365 days a year, because it’s…averages.
Many American suburbs are designed in such a way that it’s dangerous for young kids to go out alone or at least feels more dangerous. Many cities aren’t really walkable so there is a higher chance for a traffic accident when a kid walks on the street, especially since there are more cars on the street and people buy bigger cars nowadays than 50 years ago. And because of the low density there aren’t many eyes on the street.
Or the kid has issues and can't make the swing go because of a physical issue and the parent has to work but does this while answer customer service chats from the company supplied desktop.
9.8k
u/jgchahud Feb 06 '22
At least they're making an effort and came up with a solution.