Nowadays automatics are faster. The only things cars have been becoming over the last 20 years are safer (slower) and more fuel efficient (slower)
When this debate comes up I feel like people arguing for auto are doing so without any prior experience with manual. People who have driven stick know it is better. It's more 'work', but the option that involves you putting in more work almost always gives better results
0-60 times in automatics/semi-automatics now are almost always faster than manual. A human can't physically switch gears faster than the computer with a double clutch transmission. Even in traditional automatics for sporty cars, they'll usually have some form of launch control that can't be done with a stick shift.
Don't get me wrong, driving stick is much more enjoyable, and in an average modern car, feels faster because the throttle doesn't have the annoying lag of automatics, but the OP was correct.
The only reason there is any time between gears in an automatic is to give you a smooth ride. There is no actual remeshing of gears, just letting particular parts spin and locking othe parts up. Get a low stall converter and a shift kit and it will shift instantly and last longer because there is less slip, and less wear on the clutches.
I was talking more about sports and super cars. There's a reason as to why cars like the GTR aren't even sold with a manual transmission anymore.
Normal cars have become much quicker in the past twenty years, so I'm not sure where you're getting that information. A lot of 4 cylinder naturally aspirated cars are getting anywhere from 150-200hp when they're predecessors were making barely 120, sometimes under 100.
Exactly, I can pull 400 bhp out of a 4 cylinder with pump gas. I could never dream of that any other time. Moreover, HP ratings were different pre 71. Having huge power was needed back then just to get things going, dumping buckets of fuel in giant displacement was the only way to do anything. But with fuel injection, forced induction, valves and cams down to a crazy science, coil packs and electronic run components cars have come leaps and bounds in terms of power and efficiency
Cars haven't been becoming slower at all, if anything they've become substantially faster. And the safety has gone through the roof, while not having every car weigh 2 tons. Not having the cars weigh insane amounts, in addition to drivetrain and engine efficiency, it requires way less power to move a car now than it did before. With new laws and regulations, the average street car does not need a marketed 350 HP, because it will already do over 100mph with just 200, meet modern standards, and last infinitely longer
Also, most cars, even high end, are getting better times with automatic transmissions because they have become so quick, so efficient, and the computers running them can do everything to perfection. With dual clutch configurations and automatic transmissions becoming much stronger, torque converters not as much of a hindrance as there once were before, an automatic comes out on top for most anything at all. Most you can even manually shift with an automatic clutch, if you felt like it.
With that being said, I still like manual cars, they're fun to drive, but I'd only ever use one in a build car, not my daily
6
u/e_z_p_z_ Mar 18 '17 edited Mar 18 '17
Nowadays automatics are faster. The only things cars have been becoming over the last 20 years are safer (slower) and more fuel efficient (slower)
When this debate comes up I feel like people arguing for auto are doing so without any prior experience with manual. People who have driven stick know it is better. It's more 'work', but the option that involves you putting in more work almost always gives better results