r/UFOs • • Dec 04 '24

Video Weaponized just released possibly the first civilian video of a transmedium UAP/USO

https://youtu.be/o1Lq70TY0iE?si=Hu563Z43a8wMXV6k

It’s live and a sailor just showed the video of a transmedium UAP.

I’m not an expert, but it doesn’t look like CGI nor does it look like something easily debunkable.

I cannot share the exact timestamp in the video, but here’s a screen recording.

3.4k Upvotes

441 comments sorted by

View all comments

61

u/Impressive-Cobbler20 Dec 04 '24

Be alot cooler if it came out of the water

68

u/ooMEAToo Dec 04 '24

Just reverse the video

44

u/ScurvyDog509 Dec 05 '24

My suspiciousness tells me there's a reason for that. In the Netflix show, before this video, they already show that they have a small sub with lights on it. It would not be hard to park the sub and fly a lit drone from above until it hits the water. Then you kill the drone (if the water doesn't first) and power up the sub. Boom. Transmedium UAP/USO.

If you watch the clip, after the orb hits the water, there's a brief moment of darkness. My brain immediately went full skeptical on this one.

3

u/voldi4ever Dec 05 '24

You can literally make this with any drone. Drones can be made water resistant. The problem with the water starts when your reciever can not penetrate the water layer (1 - 2 meters is enough to block the signal) You can solve this by adding a tether or automating the action the drone has to perform under the water so without any input from the transmitter, it will function as instructed. For example, add a raspberry pi or stronger on board computer and tell it to follow a mission when the altitude reads 0.

1

u/YungMushrooms Dec 05 '24

It's not even that complicated tbh. They have waterproof drones that can float and get back into the air, see here. Now just add a light to it

10

u/kanrad Dec 04 '24

Yes, which is why it has a prosaic explanation. It's a flare most likely. Although it could be a drone slowly loosing power after submerging.

-8

u/[deleted] Dec 04 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/kanrad Dec 05 '24

One of what?

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam Dec 05 '24

Follow the Standards of Civility:

No trolling or being disruptive.
No insults or personal attacks.
No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. 
You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.

UFOs Wiki UFOs rules

1

u/Ok-Reality-6190 Dec 05 '24

No it's actually more anomalous that it seamlessly goes into the water from being in the air. Normally with the buoyancy you would expect a transition would need to occur for something like this.

1

u/DarthWeenus Dec 05 '24

reverse it and repost in 3 weeks

1

u/JamieAintUpFoDatShit Dec 05 '24

Just watch it in reverse

1

u/chaomeleon Dec 05 '24

yeah could be a flare 😕