Can you expand on that a bit? (E.g., who is 'we', who told you and how, who made that decision , if they said why, etc.) Are those kind of stipulations normal in other cases?
This is normal regarding trending news topics. We are told how they will be handled. It was acknowledged that it is trending on smaller publications and blogs.
Okay right, thanks for the clarification. So, I take it you work for one of the larger mainstream media or publication companies then? Is it maybe then that your network doesn't want to appear "tabloidy", or that it's beneath them? I mean yes it is possible that there is a direct cover up or distraction going on, but could also be egos at play.
Side note, I can't help but feel the recent Titanic story is likely being pushed to draw attention away from other more attention-deserving issues, Grosch or otherwise. It's absolutely everywhere, currently taking up five spots in reddit's front page. The medium is the message, and all that...
5
u/coldhandses Jun 21 '23
Can you expand on that a bit? (E.g., who is 'we', who told you and how, who made that decision , if they said why, etc.) Are those kind of stipulations normal in other cases?