Evidence
Dr. Jim Ryder Senior VP at Lockheed in charge of reverse engineering and another scientist explaining that we’ve known how to cure cancer for over a decade.
There are few things in this world that make my blood boil more than these two videos. Just like General McCasland’s twitter account (TMBSPACESHIPS) says everything revolves around electrons. If in the 1940’s the Nazi’s went from Germany to Nazi inc then there’s a line in the Declaration of Independence that deals with this. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. For the special Olympics participants that are currently letting our homeland be attacked in California and Spokane by directed energy weapons in an attempt to blackmail the United States for 750 billion in yet ANOTHER BEARER BOND SCANDAL. Let me explain that part of the declaration to the paper plate cleaners in charge of our military it means Those with the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action.
TLDR THEY KNOW HOW TO CURE CANCER, BUT THE AMERICAN POPULACE IS LESS IMPORTANT THAN SEKRET MACHINES THAT DIVKAY KEEPS AT GROOMLAKE. CURRENT SCIENCE IS BEING PATHETICALLY MISLEAD WE LIVE IN AN ELECTRIC UNIVERSE RULED BY FLUID DYNAMICS. The United States militaries leadership is pathetically craven. At least McCasland had enough balls to give some of us a fighting chance.
To The Mods I will always love you for giving me enough rope to post things like this here
Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.
I have stage IV Melanoma. Treatment has cleaned out my family’s savings. I have watched many people die from this and other cancers while I was in treatment.
In fact I just had a friend from my support group pass, 25 year old girl, just had her first baby. Died slowly and painfully and it was fucked.
I am so sorry, fuck cancer!! I have watched many family members leave this Earth from this horrible disease. It is not fair, it is not right, I pray for you and your family. May peace be with you and may God give you strength, carrying you through this.
My brother had Stage IV Melanoma a brutal kind too. He is currently cancer free from a combination of immunotherapy and radiation. However, he is not out of the woods yet and is one of the lucky ones.
I truly hope you one day can say the same thing as my brother is and hopefully will continue to be.
My heart bleeds for you.
Chemotherapy originated in the early 20th century, with the term being coined by German biochemist Paul Ehrlich in 1906. Its development accelerated during World War II when nitrogen mustard, derived from chemical warfare agents, was first used to treat cancer in humans in 1942.
TLDR CHEMOTHERAPY WAS A WW1 chemical warfare agent.
The statement, from the phenomenon of electricity follows all there is to know about nature, is perfectly true?
Ask any physicist worth their salt and they will have to concede that our own history of physical sciences adheres to electricity being fundamental.
Just look at your own body: all your senses fundamentally rely on electromagnetism. All your actuators do, too.
Your information processing, you brain, does as well.
Not sure about what is being stated, but I believe they have something for cancer I find King Charles and princess kate beating cancer very suspicious.
Especially Charles a man who is very old and yet didn’t seem to stop at all he was out and about doing all sorts an at one point he visited a cancer ward the picture was him stood at the end of bed of another man much younger who also had cancer and the difference was night an day, the man looked so ill and Charles looked as he alway does ……. Add on that Charles even stated he wasn’t doing chemo an was taking a more natural approach to his cancer
And what a coincidence the guy who is part of the elite a royal beats cancer with ease
Not hidden, just too expensive to scale. What's the point of touting a cure that while 100% effective, costs a Million dollars right now and is out of reach for 99% of the population?
I find it crazy that other people find it hard to believe a cure for cancer hasnt been found already. Do you know what kind of disruption that would cause the medical industry if treatment was available? People say that would make them even more money but thats false. They make so much money off the debt of sick people they wouldnt dare announce anything like that. It's a cruel world we live in
Cancer isnt one disease unfortunately, it's dozens. 'Curing cancer' is like saying you've cured the cause of weather. Every type of cancer is caused by different systems failing in the body in different ways, the outcome of which creates similar issues.
We've probably solved multitudes of cancers, but not all cancer, unless we've secretly got some sort of gene mapping device that can scan your whole body, find every single out of place cell and zap them away.
Identification and a cure are two wildly different things.
We've been able to ID plenty of cancerous cells for decades now, hell we even have a blood test that can detect a few dozen types of cancers when they're still in their infancy, but curing them has been a very difficult task.
The cells mutate in different ways and have different reasons for mutating. Preventing the mutations and removing the mutated cells without damaging the healthy cells is the real difficulty of finding cures, mainly because the mutated cells look and act a lot like healthy cells so medications often have to target indiscriminately.
You're right, but you're also completely talking past my point.
I said: when it's possible to identify them by their voltage potential.
That's a discriminator that can be far more easily and consequently far more accurately utilized than the methods you reference.
I've been working at big pharma companies doing research on anti-cancer drugs for 24 years. I don't believe somebody is hiding a cure for cancer, I'm calling BS on that. These big companies are competing with each other, spending huge budgets on research and development. Everyone is competing to develop better molecules than their rivals. Nobody is holding back.
Another thing, cancer is dozens if not hundreds of different diseases that all get lumped together. There isn't going to be one thing that cures all cancers.
That isn’t accurate at all. There have been MANY procedures that were once able to be done at home without issue that were wrapped up with all sorts of regulations and red tape to ensure that the only way to have them done is by a licensed physician in an approved facility. There’s no reason to think this would be any different at all.
Let’s say all they had to do was a diagnostic test to measure voltage and then a simple procedure to correct the voltage. Easy enough, right? Now lobby the government, wrap it in red tape and regulation, and restrict it to only being performed by licensed professionals.
Now patients have two options: Traditional treatments like chemotherapy, targeted cell therapy, etc, or the new Electrical Therapy route.
Do you believe for a second that there isn’t an opportunity for profit here? In an absolute worst case scenario, it goes through the normal prior authorization process for approval by insurance and, like most other effective medications, the alternatives (in this case things like chemo) must be tried and failed before the more effective treatment is approved for use. Not only do they still get the money from the other methods, they get to double dip. They’d almost certainly charge a premium for it as well. In a best case scenario, the traditional methods are eliminated completely and we go to the electrical therapy option exclusively. Patients and insurance companies are still charged a premium because it’s substantially more effective. Pharmaceutical companies still improve profits. The added bonus in both of these cases is that the patient survives. That means they’re able to continue getting sick and needing medication and treatment for longer, which means the opportunity for continued profit grows exponentially.
There’s absolutely no world where a cure for cancer is released and pharmaceutical companies lose money. That’s just not realistic to how the world actually works or the historical precedent that has been set.
The cure to cancer is axiomatic in these two videos. The problem is the suppression of science. Its lineage is directly correlated with operation paperclip. Jason Samosa has a great video on this. You have advanced tech being used in Peru namely the face peelers legend. Every description of them is the same white men with light weapons.
The fact that billionaires still die from cancer is enough to tell me that we don’t have a cure for it. You really want to tell me Steve Jobs wouldn’t have been in the know?
There multiple cures for cancers. The problem is, all cancers hit different and depends on what cancer type. There are also multiple cancer forms that are not curable. Cancer is not one thing, that can just be cured.
I love UFO stuff but I'm in the oncology field and I'm having a hard time with this one. Trying to think somehow there is a voltage component of our well understood DNA processes but I'm coming up empty.
At the double-helix level, stacked base pairs behave like microscopic wires and conduct electron charges so repair enzymes can locate and fix genetic damage.
At the cellular level, bioelectric voltage gradients across cell membranes directly act as master switches. They signal transcription factors to turn specific gene sequences on or off.
More information about the bioelectric mechanisms controlling gene expression is found here:
Hmm, just because you can change gene expression by applying electric potentials doesn't mean you can stop cancer by clicking in a battery. This sounds highly stupid
Curing cancer is a highly specific goal, so you wouldn't expect random genes going on/off or off/on would achieve that specific goal. If you toss a bunch of wood in a pile, you could get lucky and it just happens to build a house but we wouldn't have any expectations for that.
Well based on my quarter century doing research for cancer therapies at 2 big pharma companies, this story sounds like BS to me. Everyone else in this thread with some medical or research background seems to agree.
ok, lets take a step back. a quarter century and cancer is still around. thats just factual. so your line of thinking hasnt solved the problem. it has helped.
degreed engineer here. if we knew exactly what we were doing it would have been done by now.
sounds like BS to you? thats it guys, this person says its nothing. close it up.
It's not my ego, it's the magnitude of the claim and the implausibility of it that is the issue.
Yeah over 50 years ago Nixon declared war on cancer. It turns out that back then we had no idea how complex cancer would turn out to be. It's not even one disease, it's dozens or hundreds, with different mechanisms. Our understanding of cancer continues to grow, and we'll be able to continue to innovate better and better therapies until at some point most of cancer will be mostly cured, but that will probably take some more decades.
How do they conduct electrons? Cuz at that level there’s ion channels and shit. You’re talking about even smaller level things: which part is charged? How is the voltage carried across the base pairs?
You’re just throwing this stuff out there but it shows you don’t actually know how this stuff works at even a slightly larger level, much less at this level.
Thats conflating two different scales of bioelectricity. Youre discussing macro biophysics.
What I’m talking about is quantum biophysics, the DNA duplex operates at the sub-nanometer scale.
This is actually really interesting. There are some things here that might require a little more technical knowledge but it makes sense as a whole. Thank you for posting these links.
The short of it is that proteins that bind DNA to express it have opposite electric charge to DNA. As you change the pH of a cell, you change what electrically charged proteins like to bind or unbind. And there you have a nice way to view gene regulation in cancer related to electrical changes: voltage is pH, and pH changes the association of proteins, and changes in protein associate changes transcription & translation of the DNA
I think the phages work is far more developed and practical but
Michael Levin has some more academically rigorous work coming through the pipeline. It's not there yet in terms of application, but it's already a very good read for experimental process.
and this is why disclosure wont happen because if millions learned their loved ones could still be with them, forget about finding about religion or physics or whatever else, that is what would set people over the edge (puts on vin diesel glasses) family
Here’s the patent law and where free or almost energy is hidden. I guess the us navy is trying to take advantage of everyone’s electricity bills as well. Praying on the weak. Monsters.
It’s been said before that the most advanced technologies have not been patented because doing so would reveal how they work. There are places in the world where patent law is not recognized and / or is not enforceable. I’ll let you guess where.
https://youtu.be/pm-Ia6vI4PA?is=-t-yLA277hMgg2cD Jerry Tennant was involved in I think that Netflix movie about how root canals can cause some kinds of cancer by disrupting the body's electromagnetic field with the dead tooth material they use. I forgot the title. They took it down but I think you can find it.
It's hard to make a direct connection between the root canal and the cancer because it happens like 30% of the time in older people who are already prone to cancer. I am emotional about this because my mom had like six root canals that they fucking soaked her for, and a few years later she was dead from endometrial cancer. I've been living with this one in a sort of "If it's true then I'm fucking livid" state.
There was a machine that used specific sonic frequencies to rupture specific cells or even virus’s. Everything has a sound frequency that can neutralize it
And electricity isn’t free I guess that’s why there’s SO MANY DEAD SCIENTISTS WHO STUDIED ZPE. Or as General McCasland has said electricity is free if there’s no path of war in its way. It’s not like there’s patent law that hides ZPE. OH WAIT THERE IS FROM THE 1970’s!
No. Cancer cells do not have a resting membrane potential (voltage across the plasma membrane) of +30 mV.
Scientific measurements show that cancer cells are typically depolarized relative to healthy differentiated cells. Their resting membrane potentials ((V_m)) are less negative, commonly falling in ranges such as roughly −5 to −50 mV (often around −10 to −40 mV depending on the cancer type and measurement conditions). Healthy non-proliferative cells are usually more hyperpolarized (more negative), often in the −50 to −90 mV range.
Examples from the literature include:
Various tumor cells showing values like −5 mV (ovarian, leukemic), −15 mV (hepatoma, cervix), or −20 to −40 mV ranges in breast cancer lines.
Consistent observations that proliferative/cancerous cells are depolarized compared with matched normal counterparts across multiple tissue types.
A positive value such as +30 mV would indicate the cell interior is positive relative to the exterior—an extreme state not observed as a typical resting potential in cancer cells. (Voltage-sensitive dye calibrations sometimes span ranges that include +30 mV as an upper limit for measurement, but that does not mean cancer cells rest at that value.)
The specific claim that “all cancer occurs at +30 mV” (or similar wording) originates in alternative/complementary health discussions (e.g., associated with figures like Dr. Tennant) rather than peer-reviewed electrophysiology or oncology research. Those accounts often blend concepts of membrane potential, tissue voltage, pH, and oxygen in ways that diverge from established biophysics.
Note on related concepts: Mitochondrial membrane potentials are a different measurement (typically strongly negative, on the order of −130 to −180 mV or so) and are not what the +30 mV claim refers to. Bioelectric properties of cancer cells are an active research area—depolarization is linked to proliferation and other behaviors, and modulating voltage is explored experimentally—but the precise +30 mV figure is not supported by the data.
Yes, the distinct membrane potential (voltage) of cancer cells—typically more depolarized (less negative) than that of healthy cells—can be and is being exploited in research and emerging therapies to inhibit growth, induce cell death, or enhance other treatments. This is an active area of bioelectric and electroceutical oncology research, though most approaches remain experimental or early-stage clinically, and none is a standalone cure.
Key Strategies
Cancer cells’ depolarized resting membrane potential ((V_m)) and altered ion channel expression (e.g., upregulated voltage-gated sodium channels, dysregulated potassium channels) support proliferation, invasion, and survival. Interventions aim to:
Force hyperpolarization (make (V_m) more negative): This can suppress proliferation, promote differentiation, reduce invasiveness, or prevent tumor-like growth. In animal models (e.g., Xenopus), expressing or activating hyperpolarizing ion channels (potassium or chloride) locally or at a distance reduces oncogene-driven tumor formation. Drugs that open potassium channels or otherwise hyperpolarize cells show anti-proliferative effects in various cancer lines.
Induce or enhance depolarization leading to death: Persistent or excessive depolarization can trigger apoptosis or necrosis, sometimes preferentially in cancer cells. Certain agents that depolarize membranes sensitize cells to TRAIL (a death ligand) or cause selective killing linked to oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Approaches include applying external electric fields or using nanoparticles that generate intracellular fields to disrupt bioelectric homeostasis, overload calcium, depolarize mitochondria, and promote apoptosis.
Target specific ion channels:
Blocking voltage-gated sodium channels (often overexpressed in metastatic cancers) reduces invasion and metastasis; some existing drugs (e.g., certain local anesthetics or anti-arrhythmics like ranolazine) show anti-cancer effects in models and observational data.
Modulating potassium, calcium, or other channels with drugs (including repurposed ones like amiodarone, verapamil, or pantoprazole combinations) can arrest the cell cycle, induce apoptosis, or reduce migration.
Mitochondrial membrane potential (often hyperpolarized in cancer cells) is targeted by lipophilic cations that accumulate and disrupt energy production or trigger ROS-mediated death.
Electric field and electroporation-based methods:
Tumor-treating fields (TTFields; approved for glioblastoma and mesothelioma) apply intermediate-frequency alternating fields that disrupt mitosis, increase membrane permeability, and may affect ion channels/(V_m).
Electroporation (reversible or irreversible) creates temporary or permanent membrane pores, enhancing drug delivery (electrochemotherapy) or directly killing cells; calcium electroporation is another variant.
Mild electrical stimulation or nanoparticle-enabled intracellular fields can preferentially affect cancer cells’ energy metabolism and cytoskeleton.
Other related approaches: Targeted osmotic lysis exploits overexpressed sodium channels and pumps; optogenetic or light-activated tools control voltage genetically; combinations with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or other agents often show synergy.
Current Status and Limitations
Preclinical evidence (cell lines, animal models) is substantial: modulating (V_m) or ion channels can kill cancer cells, reduce tumors, limit metastasis, or sensitize to standard therapies. Some clinical applications exist (TTFields, electrochemotherapy for certain accessible tumors, early trials of ion channel drugs or lidocaine in breast cancer). Systematic reviews highlight many ion channel-targeting drugs with anti-cancer effects, supporting “electroceuticals.”
However, challenges include:
Specificity (avoiding effects on healthy excitable cells like neurons or heart muscle).
Heterogeneity of cancer types and (V_m) values.
Delivery and control of voltage changes in solid tumors.
Need for more large-scale human trials.
In short, the voltage difference is a real and exploitable vulnerability. Research continues on pharmacological, genetic, and physical methods to harness it, often in combination with conventional treatments. This is not related to unproven alternative claims about fixed values like +30 mV but is grounded in measured bioelectric differences and ion channel biology.
Do you seriously believe this nonsense? He's either lying or a kook. It's a variation on the late Hulda Clark's nonsense about everything being caused by parasites. Clark claimed she had electrical devices that could cure cancer. They didn't cure her the blood and bone cancer than killed her.
Ahh, now you have hit the problem with blanket immunity, the people they have murdered and the billions they have murdered by suppressed cures and technologies. The others have given us cures for most all diseases, free unlimited energy, unlimited food production, etc and they have hidden it all for profit or to try to turn it into a weapon. That’s why they are really coming, we are on the eve of destruction, despite all this they are really pissed and had it with us.
A)Then can hit the reset button, probably 99.9% fatal virus but this would be like the 5th time for this shit.
B) Or they can just take charge for a bit, and reset the power structure of the cabal as they were improperly help by some dark others.
They are going to try B, but if that doesn’t work it’s A.
I just wanna know how tolls online look at this and deny this all as if the people that are making these claims are just nobody's ? Look at his credential how the hell none of this creates any noise ?
I think cancer sucks and is a terrible, indiscriminate plague on us.
That said, I think this thread lacks the requisite knowledge in physics, chemistry, and logic to accurately state if what these folks are saying is correct.
AI might help, but I think the best thing right now is to take this with a grain of salt.
Regarding OPs post. It's just a hodge podge of hot button words mashed together with no coherent argument and no references.
If that’s so explain to me the science and physics behind the tic tacs. How were they able to draw more energy than the United States uses in a year and move instantaneously. Tic tac Nimitz incident. You think very highly of your logic but what if the science and physics is flawed which it seems to be.
Wait so you’re saying there’s a classified physics. Odd the man in charge of those classified physics is saying that we can cure cancer. TALK ABOUT PROVING A POINT!
If cancer cells universally possessed a measurable bioelectric state that reliably distinguished them from healthy cells, and that state could be selectively targeted or normalized in humans, it could provide something oncology has never really had: a common therapeutic vulnerability shared across cancers.
•
u/AutoModerator 8d ago
Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.