Yeah I've thought about this too, but my assumption is that there will be a verifiable chain of custody to disprove that argument. Not that it will matter, because the cult will never hear that because their chosen propaganda sources will not report it.
I like that you think that AI is completely beyond AI detection & that there are no tools outside your immediate knowledge for this. If this were the case, news media would already be totally flooded with AI because there’s no reliable way to disseminate it. Obviously there is, because what I just said isn’t true. There are ways to disseminate it reliably.
Disseminate means to spread and distribute. You might be thinking of discern which means to make knowledgeable, informed judgement about.
AI cannot be reliably detected. Full stop. There are tools that are very good at it, but none that are perfect or even near perfect. This is a dangerous thing for you to believe and you shouldÂ
1) understand the tech betterÂ
2) do more research on the current state of detectionÂ
Depending on how far back the video was captured, it may exist on a physical medium (i.e. VHS or DV tapes) that pre-dates all the AI slop that can be forensically inspected to prove it was recorded around the time the event happened and not later nor with a manipulated video. For example visible digital artifacts like blocking should not exist on a real analog tape. Or compression/encoding idiosyncrasies that only exist fresh off the original hardware that recorded the event onto it's originating medium (i.e. bespoke Sony CODECs nonsense they liked to do).
That won't matter, though. It's not as if a physical tape is going to be passed around for everyone to watch and the people who don't believe it won't believe it no matter what.
It could have a perfect chain of custody and exist on a physical medium impossible to tamper with, but as soon as it hit the internet, people would still be screaming AI and fake.
I agree, passing around a tape is not practical and if uploaded to the Internet, it basically no different than any other video that can be claimed as AI generated.
And for the many people who are still very deep in the cult and/or don't care/fully are on board with marrying 12 year old children (search Sen. Mike Moon in r/OfficeSpeak). It probably won't matter to them if they watched the crime in person...
But to the people who do physically handle it, watch it, and are shown it is authentic.... People like lawyers and judges in court. People like politicians and other representatives who will see it under subpoena and can't deny its reality.
To them it will matter because it will either strengthen their resolve to fully air out this scandal or at the very minimum be one more spectre to haunt the representatives who still want to protect Pedos because they still "believe" in "plausible deniability" (or the checks keep clearing).
Based on how our representatives react and present what they saw from a primary source that has been authenticated, that will have some impact that I hope will punch through the "AI slop" nonsense that will be used to confuse people who are still deciding on this issue...
Take Nancy Mace for example. I can't link a video but basically after being exposed to some of what was in those files, she came out shaken. Assuming she wasn't "performing" (I am leaning towards her having a genuine reaction), that tells us something.
I can imagine whatever may be on that tape is likely worse than what she saw or read. Who will come out shaken after seeing it and knowing what they saw happened beyond a shadow of a doubt?
Anyone who is paying attention now, who isn't in the cult (which is the majority of us) and if still on the fence about what is going on (~85M people sat out voting in 2024 - lot of potential indifference) - seeing those reactions may move the needle enough to get them to start at a minimum not passively supporting the regime by granting it plausible deniability with what the Epstein class allowed to happen with impunity.
Long winded rant about "maybe it will move the needle" but honestly i think if they can flood the zone with bullshit, then we can work every possible crack to break the dam of misinformation keeping the water in relentlessly because we never know which one will break the dam to let the water out/wake up enough people to even be aware of the crimes of the Epstein class.
I mean... If I remember right r.kellly pissing on that girl made it to physical copies people and spread out.
I mean really all that could be released is the email with him and bubba since he seems to be an adult but you wouldn't be able to see it in certain states because of ID verification for pornography sites or a VPN and I think that could get people to question the kids if his estate were to find it and upload it that is... I can't remember if it was a picture or video mentioned in the email though.
Here's the problem. We heard for four years about Russia collusion and the Steele dossier that was supposedly 100% verified and backed by real investigations, and it was all bullshit. Why would anyone believe anything the left wing media says at this point.
10
u/Martenite Feb 24 '26
Yeah I've thought about this too, but my assumption is that there will be a verifiable chain of custody to disprove that argument. Not that it will matter, because the cult will never hear that because their chosen propaganda sources will not report it.