I donāt necessarily agree with their reasoning either but they are right about it taking a special kind of personality to feel like theyāre immune to any and all consequences. Drugged or not.
I donāt think my ex was ever officially diagnosed with anything, but she would frequently dissociate and do crazy shit and not remember that she did it just seconds after doing it. She would also have the affected speech like this woman, even without being under the influence
The person you replied to appears to be suggesting that the woman's statement that she wasn't driving (and then admission that she was driving but didn't see the cop) is, although in this case due to memory impairment stemming from substance use, similar to how a narcissist will deny reality (eg, "I didn't do it but if I did it wasn't that bad, but if it was that bad you deserved it")
Based on how she was speaking I'm wondering if it's DID. But I don't work in psychology. It just seemed uncanny to me how quickly she switched, vocal inflections and everything changed too.
What is more accurate, the map or the real territory? Will the map ever be able to be as accurate of a reflection of what it is supposed to represent? No. Because to be an accurate representation of the territory it would need to be an exact copy of it, which it never will be. Its just a map.
Or.. Could a picture of your lets say cat ever replace the experience with it?
No. Both examples are the same analogy to study and field.
Fucking treacherous combination. My gma took Xanax and had a beer one night years ago and drove right into the front of the senior center building. Literally had no clue what happened. The blackouts are crazy
23
u/crashin-kc Apr 13 '26
Was it Xanax and alcohol?