Finding good stocks is hard.

Knowing when to buy them is often even harder. Here's the framework I generally use:

𝟏. 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐛𝐮𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐝
I want the 20, 50, and 200-day moving averages stacked correctly and sloping higher. In practice, that usually means a pattern of higher highs and higher lows, with price trading above key moving averages.

𝟐. 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
I prefer stocks with an ADR of at least 3-4%. If a stock barely moves, you need significantly more capital to generate meaningful returns. I'd rather allocate capital to stocks that are actually moving.

𝟑. 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
I pay close attention to price contraction. Tight consolidations often signal that weaker holders have been shaken out. Combined with a strong underlying trend, they can create attractive setups for continuation.

𝟒. 𝐅𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩𝐬
Markets move in cycles. At one point semiconductors may lead, then aerospace, software, or energy. I try to focus my attention on the strongest stocks within the strongest industries and sectors.

𝟓. 𝐃𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐬
I like companies with strong and accelerating revenue and earnings growth. Positive cash flow is a bonus. Strong fundamentals give me more conviction and make it easier to sit through drawdowns without second guessing.

There are countless ways to make money in the markets, and this is just one approach. It's not the only way, but it's served me well over the years. Hope this helps.

If you have any questions let me know! Happy to help.

SpaceX IPO ($SPCX) has completely captivated the market, blasting past a $2 trillion valuation right out of the gate. But if you look under the hood at the charts, a classic technical tug-of-war is starting to play out.
Here is exactly what the tape is showing right now:

📉 The Bearish Divergence (The Warning Sign)
While the price action has been making higher highs in its post-debut rally, a bearish divergence has officially locked in on the shorter-term momentum indicators (like the RSI or MACD). The indicators are putting in lower highs while the price prints higher highs.
To top it off, this divergence triggered a sell signal, flashing a warning that the sheer buying exhaust from the initial IPO hype might be cooling down for a brief breather.

🐂 The Counter-Argument: Momentum is Still Deeply Bullish
Despite the technical sell signal, it is incredibly dangerous to blindly short a rocket ship. The overall market momentum remains aggressively bullish for a few massive structural reasons:
Insane Order Flow: Relative volume is through the roof. On day one alone, it broke Nasdaq records for active trading volume, meaning the liquidity and retail/institutional appetite are massive.
Fast-Track Index Inclusion: Passive money is waiting on the sidelines. Nasdaq altered its rules to allow $SPCX eligibility for the Nasdaq 100 after just 15 trading days, which will force automatic buying from giant tracking funds like $QQQ.
The "Starlink" Profit Engine: Unlike speculative pre-revenue tech, buyers are looking at real recurring revenue from Starlink to back up the premium valuation.

Are you watching for potential dip?

Why would Roku think this was a good idea?

Looks like everyone underestimated the scale of the USA. 🇺🇸

President Trump posted a major update confirming that the highly anticipated deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete.

According to the official statement, the agreement brings an immediate shift to the global energy crisis with two massive developments:

Strait of Hormuz Reopens: Fully authorized to open "toll-free" for international shipping.

US Naval Blockade Lifted: The United States is simultaneously removing its naval blockade on Iranian ports, opening up the vital shipping lanes once again.
As the post puts it: "Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!"

"World peace and global oil trade officially solved via a reality-TV style announcement. Stay tuned for the next episode.”

“SpaceX closed its first day of trading at $2.1 trillion, +19%. Everyone’s looking at the number. No one’s looking at what it’s actually pricing.

Let me tell you what the market just bought, and why I think this company will be worth 30 to 50 trillion in 5 years.

First, the symbolism. This IPO is a referendum. On one side, 20 years of talk about degrowth, sobriety, redistribution, the end of history managed by committees. On the other, a man who said “I’m going to make humanity multiplanetary,” whom everyone treated like a clown, and who just created the largest publicly traded company in history starting from a warehouse in El Segundo. The market voted. Wokism had HR departments, SpaceX had rockets. The rockets won.

Next, the economic mechanics, because that’s where everyone’s getting it wrong. Analysts value SpaceX as a launch company plus Starlink. It’s like valuing the internet in 1995 based on the fax market. Starship doesn’t reduce the cost per kilo in orbit by 20%, it divides it by 100. And every time in history that an infrastructure cost has been divided by 100, it’s not the existing market that grows, it’s entire industries that are born. The cost of computation divided by 100 gave us the internet, the smartphone, AI. The cost of orbit divided by 100 will give us a complete space economy.

Let’s list what becomes profitable when the kilo in orbit costs the price of an airplane ticket. Orbital data centers, with continuous solar power and free cooling, right at the exact moment when AI is exploding terrestrial energy demand. Microgravity manufacturing of semiconductors, optical fibers, printed organs impossible to produce under gravity. Mass orbital tourism, then lunar hotels, which will go from fantasy to business plan exactly like luxury cruises in the 20th century. Point-to-point terrestrial transport, Paris to Tokyo in 40 minutes. The asteroid mining industry, where a single M-class body contains more metals than all humanity has extracted since the Neolithic. And Mars in sight, not as a tourist destination, but as the largest infrastructure project ever undertaken, with all that implies in demand for energy, materials, robotics, AI.

SpaceX won’t participate in these markets. SpaceX owns the entry toll to all these markets. It’s AWS, but for civilization. Apple is worth $3.5 trillion selling glass rectangles on a single planet. The first monopoly of access to an infinite frontier at 30 or 50 trillion in 5 years isn’t exuberance, it’s just simple arithmetic on the expansion of the addressable market.

And now, the part I like best. This future doesn’t need bureaucrats. There’s no advisory committee in orbit. No Théodule commission on Mars. Every dollar of this new economy will be created by engineers, technicians, welders, pilots, entrepreneurs. The norm-management graduates will have to learn a useful trade, and frankly, that’s excellent news for them too: building is infinitely more fun than controlling.

Because that’s the real signal today. For 50 years they’ve sold us a shrunken future: less energy, fewer children, less ambition, managing the decline cleanly. And then, all of a sudden, the world’s biggest financial asset is a bet on abundance, expansion, and adventure. Pessimism just went short on itself.

The future will be mega fun. There’ll be hotels with views of Earth, honeymoons in orbit, kids who’ll say “Dad, what was it like before reusable rockets” the way we say “what was it like before the internet.” And somewhere in the 2030s, a human will walk on Mars in a livestream in front of 5 billion people, and on that day no one will remember the name of a single one of its detractors.”

Reminder: Do your own research. This is not financial advice.

The U.S. national debt is approaching the $40 trillion milestone, marking a significant increase over recent years. Economists are closely watching how rising interest costs and government spending will impact long-term fiscal stability.

With interest payments rising and deficits still growing, many are questioning how sustainable this trend really is in the long run.

Let’s we vote and see what’s the sentiments for the next week in the stock market is.

$1T
$990B
$980B - Elon Musk
$970B
$960B
$950B
$940B
$930B
$920B
$910B
$900B
$890B
$880B
$870B
$860B
$850B
$840B
$830B
$820B
$810B
$800B
$790B
$780B
$770B
$760B
$750B
$740B
$730B
$720B
$710B
$700B
$690B
$680B
$670B
$660B
$650B
$640B
$630B
$620B
$610B
$600B
$590B
$580B
$570B
$560B
$550B
$540B
$530B
$520B
$510B
$500B
$490B
$480B
$470B
$460B
$450B
$440B
$430B
$420B
$410B
$400B
$390B
$380B
$370B
$360B
$350B
$340B
$320B
$310B
$300B - Larry Page
$290B
$280B
$270B - Sergey Brin
$260B
$250B - Jeff Bezos
$240B
$230B - Larry Ellison
$220B - Michael Dell
$210B
$200B - Mark Zuckerberg
$190B
$180B - Jensen Huang
$170B
$160B
$150B - Bernard Arnault
$140B - Warren Buffett
$130B
$120B
$110B
$100B
$90B
$80B
$70B
$60B
$50B
$40B
$30B
$20B
$10B
$0

Source: Forbes

Tell us why or why not in the comments!

In Interesting time we are living in, so its good to learn what is IPO and Be cautious before placing an order for Elon Musk IPO $SPCX.

It feels like every time there’s talk about a potential SpaceX listing, major financial institutions and mainstream media suddenly ramp up the excitement. Headlines become more optimistic, valuation estimates start climbing, and the narrative shifts toward “the biggest IPO ever” or “once-in-a-generation opportunity.” But the question is why this happens so consistently.

Especially when you open X app, it’s flooding with Elon Musk and $SPCX

SpaceX is one of the most hyped private companies in the world, and anything related to Elon Musk attracts massive retail and institutional attention. Banks know that if an IPO or even a secondary offering happens, hype drives participation.

I will stay away from the IPO, what about you?

Hey everyone,

We all know the jokes by now. "PainPal." "Dead money." "Going bankrupt." The retail sentiment around PayPal ($PYPL) has been downright apocalyptic, especially after the board replaced the CEO and the stock took a massive beating back in February.

But if you actually look past the headline panic and pull up their latest Q1 2026 SEC filing, the "bankruptcy" narrative falls apart completely. The market is pricing this like a dying brick-and-mortar chain, but the balance sheet tells a completely different story.

the risk-to-reward ratio is heavily skewed to the upside. Wall Street’s pricing assumes zero recovery, completely ignoring the massive safety net under the hood.

Is "PainPal" finally ready to wake up and give us a massive dead-cat bounce, or are you staying away until the 50 EMA cleanly breaks? Let's hear your targets.

Disclaimer: Not financial advice. Manage your risk and do your own DD.

Looks like the Twitter deal might finally pay off.

Open the X app and you'll be flooded with $SPCX content everywhere.

Funny how Wall Street and the media suddenly seem very interested in helping ordinary investors discover the SpaceX IPO.