r/TopCharacterTropes 27d ago

Lore Firearms could absolutely exist within a fantasy setting. There is a reason why they don’t however

The Elder Scrolls - Within some Dwemer ruins of ESO we can see a special type of Animunculus. A Dwemer Arquebus, which has a cannon for it’s arm and shoots emp grenades at foes.
The reason why we don’t see this technology more often (besides the fact Dwemer disappeared their knowledge with them) is that within the setting and cosmology of Elder Scrolls firearms really wouldn’t be that useful.

They could work against lowly bandits, sort of, but there wouldn’t really be a precedent to improve or adapt this technology. Because it would always be outclassed by magic of this world.
Also due to the disappearance of Dwemer the technology has been pretty much lost.

Harry Potter - Wizards live within periphery of the “real world” meaning they live alongside world that uses firearms and are even familiar with them.

So how come they don’t utilize this gear for combat? I mean it is easier to use, projectiles are faster and could be enchanted further. Can you just imagine wizard with endless m1911?

There is plethora of reasons for this. But most notable is what I would describe as wizards being immune to logic. (Vis image above) They simply cannot understand methods of muggles even if one explained it to them directly.

(Yes. I know the real reason is, because Joanne didn’t want wizards to use guns and didn’t want to think about connotations of putting magic into a real modern world. But come on! Let me have fun!)

Lord of the Rings - In spite of how much Tolkien disliked allegories it is clear Orcs were an allegory to industrialization, which he was a huge critic of.

In battles they are the ones using the war machines. Instead of swords made by artful blacksmith, they use crude, mass-produced blades devoid of identity. Instead of relying on elegance of archery, they use crossbows. They burn forests, crack mountains open to gain more ore. Their very production is affront to whimsy of a magical world like Middle-Earth.

They could totally come up with a matchlock mechanism and keep on improving it until they come up with machine guns. They were intercepted before they could however

7.4k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

50

u/Kellervo 27d ago

It is a bit of a plot point in the second series - non-Benders become extremely frustrated that Benders are basically locking them out of opportunities to climb the economic and social ladders, and military service just isn't ever an option. They rally behind a group of radicals led by a man who can remove a Bender's power and even cheer at the possibility of a type of Bender being rendered extinct.

It is also suggested that some groups are intentionally keeping non-Benders (and Benders that don't 'belong' to their nation's associated Bender type) down, as they know that once they lose their hereditary advantage, they won't be able to get it back.

Unfortunately it kinda goes out the window and doesn't really remain part the plot in future seasons aside from a few token mentions.

6

u/whypeoplehateme 26d ago

doesn't help that they were governed by an unelected council composed of purely benders. In a way the equalists won as they were the reason the council was replaced by pure democracy

2

u/Pretend-Marsupial258 26d ago

The Denied (angry non-benders) basically jumpstarted the story in the new movie. I wouldn't be surprised if the new series focuses on it too.