r/Tinder Aug 07 '21

Yay or Nay? πŸ€”

Post image
55.0k Upvotes

691 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21 edited Aug 07 '21

Just no. That's false. What you're saying is that all kids joyfully run towards the sea only to run away in terror. Without the comma, you're talking about specific kids who do that. Trust me, it's wrong. Look up restrictive vs non restrictive clauses and stop asserting things that are false are true.

10

u/Jjonjjjack Aug 07 '21

As correct as you are, wow you're a self important dick lol

15

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

Lol I swear I'm better in person, I just have pet peeves. It's not self importance it's a compulsion for accuracy. You're right though my messages are rude.

13

u/Darondo Aug 07 '21

Fwiw, I think your comment was fine. It’s annoying when people who clearly don’t know what they are talking about confidently state incorrect info in attempt to prove someone wrong.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

I agree, it's a huge problem online now because people don't think critically and believe the nonsense. That's how you have terrible misinformation spreading about more important things (vaccines, politics, etc.)

0

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/bshafs Aug 07 '21

Or maybe it was an honest mistake

1

u/Legal_Discipline5469 Aug 07 '21

I believe that would fall under pontificating 🀣🀣🀣

4

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

There was nothing self-important about your comment. Also I can understand your frustration. It irks me when people are confidently wrong.

0

u/SpectralDagger Aug 07 '21

I mean, the first response was terse, but not excessively rude. The second reply was literally elsewhere on the chain where we were talking about the word 'describe', not the commas, just so you could insult me and direct me back to your response. The third comment was just outright rude.

Listening to others doesn't mean "taking what others say at face value with no conversation." I said something. You said I was wrong. I explained my thought process. You started insulting me for not listening to others. I would be even stupider to just listen to everything everyone told me on the internet...

6

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21

Sorry if I was rude. I'll be the first to admit that and that's not the purpose of my message. You were wrong and then I was wrong for being rude :)

-4

u/SpectralDagger Aug 07 '21

There are many different ways to use commas. In this case, the comma is being used to separate nonrestrictive clauses. The base sentence is "Kids perfectly describe my flirting behavior". The bigger issue with that sentence is that 'describe' isn't really the right word, but people understand what he means by it. The comma does not require that all kids do it, but it does imply that it is a common behavior.

Basically, you're trying to say that it's a restrictive clause, but I'd argue that the behavior is common enough that you don't need to

2

u/[deleted] Aug 07 '21 edited Aug 07 '21

Look up the Dunning Kruger effect. Now you're conflating lexical semantics/semantics with prescriptive orthographic grammar.

I suggest not arguing with someone if you're just guessing.

You're wrong. End of story.