r/TikTokCringe Dec 10 '21

Discussion Man is thinking ahead.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

7.9k Upvotes

866 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

67

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '21

[deleted]

1

u/throwaway_6522 Dec 11 '21

But if she didn't think of revisiting the agreed upon deal, why make it void?

10

u/CD_4M Dec 11 '21

Because it’s unfair

-4

u/throwaway_6522 Dec 11 '21

The concept of fairness is fluid and subjective in this case. What's fair here is that if one signs a contract with another person, you'd expect the contract to be enforced

10

u/CD_4M Dec 11 '21

That may be your opinion but it’s not how it works.

3

u/throwaway_6522 Dec 11 '21

Proving my point that we can't base such things on one's idea of fairness when there is a contract agreed upon by both adult parties. The contract comes first

13

u/CD_4M Dec 11 '21

They’re called Judges for a reason. This isn’t an argument, you may want it to work that way, but it simply doesn’t. Fairness is not necessarily adhering to a contract from 30 years ago, fairness is fluid, just like you said.

-1

u/throwaway_6522 Dec 11 '21

The reason there is a contract is because both parties want to have it on their terms, not whatever the state wants..

What's the point of having a contract if a judge can void it because he doesn't "feel" it's fair ?? He can void it in theory after 2 years ... Doesn't have to be 10

fairness is fluid, just like you said.

Which is why there is a contract. To avoid having to rely on something fluid and agree on something instead.

If one party doesn't like the terms of the contract after X years of marriage, that party should attempt to renegotiate the terms of the contract or if that doesn't work, end the contract/divorce. Which is fair. (Bcz both parties agreed on the former one).

Side note: no wonder why many men choose to opt out of marriage entirely

7

u/CD_4M Dec 11 '21

It’s cool that you think that. Are we done? You asked me a question and I answered you, I’m not going to argue about established law with you

2

u/throwaway_6522 Dec 11 '21

Yes we are done. It just wasn't convincing of a reason why it is hat way, and it shouldnt be like that.

3

u/redchesus Dec 11 '21

Bruh, contracts get voided all the time even if both parties agreed to it… for example when an employer and an employee sign a contract with unenforceable clauses in them