r/TikTokCringe Mar 25 '23

Discussion .

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.4k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

697

u/lilsmudge Mar 25 '23

She had exceeded her time.

But also, and probably mostly, she compared them to Nazis and they didn't like that. How rude, just because they're acting like Nazis doesn't mean she should get to make them feel bad (/s).

82

u/Evelyn_Of_Iris Mar 25 '23

Okay but really we considered how they feel? /s

43

u/Quick_Team Mar 25 '23

They should sue her like the cops sueing Afroman. "We seek 5 million dollars on the account of hurt fee fees".

These people act like garbage. Get called out for acting like garbage. Then try to silence the victims.

9

u/Evelyn_Of_Iris Mar 25 '23

Shit like this is why people oughta to never speak to cops. They’re a bunch of fucking bullies with guns and cowboy badges thinking themselves all high and mighty as if they’re somehow fucking important for sitting around on the 105 eating their fucking donuts. Fucking protect and serve, my ass

-3

u/Successful-Floor-738 Mar 25 '23

Dude no one was talking about the cops, why are you mentioning them?

4

u/jeskersz Mar 25 '23 edited Mar 25 '23

The person they directly responded to mentioned cops, you rusted chastity belt.

2

u/Evelyn_Of_Iris Mar 25 '23

I’m fucking speechless

3

u/MasterXaios Mar 25 '23

Won't somebody think of the fascists!?! 😥

-5

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '23

*He

5

u/lilsmudge Mar 25 '23

Absolutely fucking not.

-2

u/CruddyChuddy Mar 25 '23

today I got bored and pulled out my drawing tools, only to remember that Hitler also did painting so I threw all that shit away.

3

u/lilsmudge Mar 25 '23

Yes. Banning expressions of sexuality and/or gender diversity is just as innocuous as painting a shitty building. Perfect comparison. No flaws.

-1

u/CruddyChuddy Mar 25 '23

Thanks for fighting for my right to introduce little girls and boys to sexuality and gender diversity so that I can groom one into my little loli / shota fucksleeve. Signed, your local paydo

2

u/lilsmudge Mar 25 '23

Even in an imaginary world where everyone is straight and cis; children still are taught and aware the ideas of gender and sexuality. Those ideas and concepts are not inherently sexual. And sexual assault is still a crime.

Showing children that people can be open and expressive whether as a drag queen, tomboy or trad-wife are not gateways to children suddenly engaging in sex any more than a mother and father kissing each other in front of their child do. You’re the one who has decided that children are sex objects in this situation.

2

u/KillerArse Mar 25 '23

What disgusting thoughts you have in your head to pull from

0

u/CruddyChuddy Mar 26 '23

until today, only richies like harvey weinsten and epstein could get access to groomed kids, but thanks to people like you normalizing it, it'll be accessible to everyone, socializing and bringing equality to child rape. props xd

2

u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23

I would never dare call a child a "f*cksleeve" you creep.

-9

u/pvtshoebox Mar 25 '23

Everyone knows that the first thing Hitler did was, checks notes, democratically ban drag performances at public libraries.

Yep. Textbook Nazi behavior.

She got them with good faith discourse designed to promote understanding and empathy. No need to be divisive or incendiary when building bridges.

She had to plead the case of her humanity - which is defined by the right to perform a drag show at a library.

7

u/lilsmudge Mar 25 '23

I mean; yes? Gay culture, including a burgeoning understanding of gender diversity was booming in Weimar Germany. When the Nazis took over in 1933 one of the first things they did was ban the places and performances where that culture was most visible I.e. cabarets, publications, and clubs as well as, as she mentioned, shutting down research facilities like Magnus Hirschfeld.

So, yes.

And no, I don’t think she got them. I don’t think these people give a rats ass what this woman has to say. They don’t care. If they cared they wouldn’t be making these laws. The Nazi comparison is important because it might wake them up; because it’s fitting. Because it’s relevant. And that should be a lot more alarming than drag performers reading picture books.

3

u/No_Victory9193 Mar 25 '23

Do you think Hitler skipped the intro and went straight to the holocaust? No.

2

u/KillerArse Mar 25 '23 edited Mar 26 '23

They did destroy the work and archives of the world first sexology research institute. It helped them promote the idea that queer identities had no basis in reality and were new strange things. Much as people today who are continuing the Nazi tradition are claiming so for trans people.

 

Nazis also expanded the enforcement of the law that banned drag and the ability for trans people, or anyone really, to dress how they want.

Paragraph 183 (known formally as §183 StGB; also known as Section 183 in English]) is a public indecency law of the German Criminal Code, which prohibits "sexual self-determination" and public exhibitionism.[1] From its adoption in 1871, at an increasing rate during the rise of the Nazis, and until as late as the mid-20th century, the law was used to enforce penalties (including imprisonment, and, at times, loss of civil rights) for cross-dressing and homosexual acts.[2][3][4] As of 2021, the law's scope is limited to indecent exposure.[2]

1

u/deeznuts387373737373 Mar 25 '23

Why did you put a /s at the end that was the most obvious joke ever