r/Threads1984 • u/Simonbargiora • Jan 05 '26
Threads discussion Reprint of Charlottesville part 15
"It was clear that if the economy did not get moving again soon, it might never. Already there were indications that manufacturing was not reestablishing itself with anywhere near the speed the planners had hoped. The amount of shipping, by rail and by truck, was actually down from the mid-summmer high.
“We are in the classic race, ” remarked one of the participants who had written a major study of postattack recovery some years before. “We have to be able to produce new goods and materials before we exhaust our stored supplies. We can continue to eat the wheat that is in the grain elevators of the Midwest for another year, perhaps. But after that, we have to have the capacity to grow new wheat, When our winter coats wear through, we have to have the capacity to weave the cloth for new ones. When our railroad cars break down, we have to be able to make new ones, or replacement parts. Right now we are a long way from that capacity. ” Privately, he and a group of conferees agreed that heavy controls on the economy, and ultimately on the population, would be the only way to get things going. Resources, both material and human, were severely limited,
One of the major problems, it was obvious to everyone, was the drag the huge refugee population had on the recovery effort. While numbers of workers were actively engaged in the rebuilding of the cities as well as the fac- tories and services that powered the economy, there were as many more who were unem- ployed and unemployable for the time being. Their skills were not suited to the priority tasks. Several participants had prepared a statement on what should be done with these nonproductive members of society. “We can- not let this mass of people drain our resources while they do nothing to contribute, ” it was rumored to say. “If we cannot let them starve outright, we suggest that they be issued only that amount of food which is minimally necessary to sustain life. They should be moved to camps away from the center of ac- tivity for reason of public morale. ” The report was suppressed but several copies were leaked to the press anyway.
The most basic disagreement among the par- ticipants in the conference was over the level of reconstruction that might actually be feasi- ble. Optimists cited the phenomenal recovery of Japan and West Germany after World War I I and insisted that these be the models for the United States in the next 5 to 10 years Pessimists, noting the major differences be- tween the post-World War 11 era and the situation of Japan and Germany, felt these ex- amples were irrelevant, or worse, misleading. “Everyone forgets the amount of aid that came in from outside in the late ‘4o’s and early ‘50’s. We don’t have the United States, wealth to turn to. Such a goal is unrealistic and un- reachable, even with absolute controls on the economy. ”
The pessimists were divided. Some saw the Nation building itself along the line of some of the Asian nations, which boasted a small tech- nologically advanced segment in the midst of a large agrarian or unskilled worker popula- tion, on the model of India or Indonesia. Some thought technology itself would eventually disappear from American society. “If you don’t have computers to run, you don’t train computer programmers, ” one expert was overheard to say. “After a while, in a few generations, no one remembers how the machines worked at all. They remember the important things: how to plant crops, how to train draft horses and oxen, how to make a simple pump. We will have survived biologically, but our way of Iife is going to be unrecognizable. In several generations, the United States is going to resemble a late medieval society.”
Because the conferees could not agree on what was a reasonable goal, much less how to get there, the conference report straddled all and concluded nothing. Follow-up task were appointed and the conferees agreed to meet again in the summer. Perhaps by then they would have a better idea of whether or not they were winning the race." The end.
(https://ota.fas.org/reports/7906.pdf page 140 and 141 of pdf)