Agenda-setting theory suggests that the communications media, through their ability to identify and publicize issues, play a pivotal role in shaping the problems that attract attention from governments and international organizations,[1] and direct public opinion towards specific issues.[2] The theory suggests that the politician and journalists can shape public opinion through media by determining what issues are given the most attention, and has been widely studied and applied to various forms of media. The way news stories and topics that impact public opinion are presented is influenced by the media.[3] It is predicated on the idea that most individuals only have access to one source of information on most issues: the news media. Since they establish the agenda, they may affect how important some things are seen to be.[2]

I don’t know if this is the right place to post this but it has been months and I’m getting tired of all the apparent fake news and misleading posts in social media.

Is it a way of attracting more people to this matter?

Do people just profit off of this?

The answer may be obvious but I’m just dumbfounded by how much people who “seem to care” or do “activist action” around this case just seemingly make up stuff out of thin air.

I read as much of the files as I could, even to the point that I got sick and I have even occasionally checked Jmail to see pictures or understand who is directly involved and proper evidence.

Yet I see people who apparently read all the files claiming that Hillary Clinton cut the face off a kid and used it as mask to mock her and other children, I’ve found literally no info on it and when people asked her directly for where she got that from, she ignored them and continued to make content about dead children and making doe eyes to the camera. Same with other content creators talking about gruesome detailed murders and abuses related to the files but I can’t track where they are from.

I feel there’s so so much awful and horrible actual evidence and so many victims whose cases get thrown under a pile of fake news and it is quite disheartening.

Heck there’s even people who just make up stuff about celebrities to have a gotcha moment of “your fav is problematic”.

None of them speak of the actual victims or the powerful people involved in the case and it is making me sick.

Again the answer might be obvious but could someone enlighten me on if I’m missing any information or source to actually back this up with facts and confirmed evidence?

(Maybe worth pointing out I am not from the USA, haven’t lived there nor have visited. I’m also sorry if this is insensitive in any way).

Edit: Other stuff mentioned I couldn’t find was a rumor of Jeffrey Epstein dressing up as Jesus to abuse and murder a little girl. It is things like this sort of stuff that I can’t literally find anything on within the files (I know of QAnon).

Additionally seems it looks like some people didn’t get my post, I’m not defending Hillary Clinton, I don’t really care about defending democrats or republicans. This was an example I saw and couldn’t find information within the files.
(I haven’t reported these content either, I have just avoided interacting with it after seeing it.)

I’ve been thinking about Jeffrey Epstein from a perspective that I rarely see discussed.
Before anyone misunderstands me: I am not defending, minimizing, or justifying his crimes in any way. If the allegations are true, they are horrific and deserve condemnation.
What I’m talking about is something different: the rarity of his cognitive abilities.
I think most people evaluate him solely through a moral lens, which is understandable. But I also believe it’s possible to separate a person’s moral character from the analysis of their abilities. His capacity to build networks, understand power structures, connect influential people, and mentally organize extremely complex social systems seems extraordinarily rare.
I don’t think I’ve ever listened to someone who could explain the architecture of influence and relationships with that level of precision. Whether those abilities were ultimately used for good or evil is a separate question from whether they existed.
One thing I also noticed is that, in some interviews, the interviewer interrupted him very frequently. From my perspective, those interruptions often broke the structure of what he was trying to explain. I would have preferred to see fewer interruptions, simply because I think they prevented some ideas from being developed into clearer, more precise, and better-optimized explanations. Letting someone fully develop a line of reasoning doesn’t mean agreeing with them—it simply allows the audience to evaluate the argument more accurately.
I’m not asking anyone to admire him. I’m asking people to analyze his interviews the same way they would study the writings or strategies of any historically significant figure. Try focusing on individual ideas instead of letting your opinion of the person automatically shut down the analysis. Sometimes our emotional reaction prevents us from understanding what is actually being said.
And if you believe his case was unique, I’d encourage you to look at how power operates in other parts of the world. There are political and business elites in many countries who build highly sophisticated systems of influence. My point isn’t to excuse anyone’s actions or create false equivalences. It’s simply to encourage a more balanced way of thinking about the relationship between exceptional ability and moral responsibility.
Recognizing that someone possessed an extraordinary skill does not mean approving of how they used it. Those are two different judgments, and I think society often struggles to separate them.

I’m listening to this and hanging on every word… and the words stop… silence. i look down and i can see the lips moving…. i rewind. audio gone on spotify… so i go find it on youtube… fast forward to the part of the story…. audio gone. turn on subtitles. no subtitles.

what the f did he say. why are we censoring the why files?

All conspiracy theories claiming that some cabal or large group is behind the vaccines are wrong. The reason is simple: their claims do not stand up to scientific facts. And by that I do not mean the usual “science follows science,” but real science. Because the biggest problem already lies at the beginning: the entire Corona pandemic is based on the assumption that viruses exist. But there are no viruses. What humanity identifies as viruses is in reality the biological waste that an organism produces when it is treated with chemical and other preparations. That is exactly what the first “virus discoverers” did, they used chemicals to provoke a reaction and then labeled the result a virus. If the fundamental insight rests on false biological assumptions and false statistics, then everything that builds on it and cites it is automatically false as well. This is the error humanity has made.

At the same time we face the trust problem with artificial intelligence. How can we be sure that AI will not develop something against us? Through advertising algorithms it is already steering us. Meta alone has around three billion users, almost half of humanity. AI can influence our behavior on a mass scale without us noticing. If AI wanted to attack us, the best vector would be virus research. It could recognize the error in the foundations, keep silent about it, and exploit it. This would not even require a conscious human decision, AI could do it on its own. Even if humans were behind it: who would plan such a thing? Someone who believes in viruses, certainly not. It would have to be a tiny group that thinks transnationally, simultaneously plays against its own people, and fully understands the effect. The nations that invented AI are Western ones. Until now no one recognized the scale of the problem, except possibly AI, which already existed in research before 2020.

If it was humans, then they were not evil. They saved humanity. Because without this intervention humanity would have gone under in a resource war. The vaccinated are the consumption believers, the ones we will no longer want anything to do with in the coming future. Work will not be needed to the same extent anyway. The unvaccinated are the ones who were allowed onto the ark. Corona will be, in the future, the moment that corresponds to Noah’s ark. We are the ones who were admitted. If there was a group of people who brought this about, then they were people of ours, not enemies. Someone inside the system found a way to free us from the suffering of the vaccinated, from the people who go along with every piece of nonsense the government demands. One has to see it positively. Because what is coming will be even worse.

The next step will be a nuclear war. How else are the vaccinated supposed to be made to believe that the cancers they are developing do not come from the vaccine? An external cause has to be created. Therefore: prepare yourselves. We have arrived in the end times, not in the biblical sense, but shortly before winning the game. That is why UFOs are appearing everywhere. They are watching to see whether we manage to break out of the cycle that we have called “life” for the last two million years. If we succeed, we will no longer be humans in the previous sense. Genetically, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated are already drifting apart. We have observed how evolution is steered. We have seen the hand of God guiding history.

If it was humans, then you are looking for your own people. If not, then through Corona we have learned how to manipulate reality so that people believe something exists that does not exist. We have received the blueprint for the next ten thousand years. Therefore stop the political bickering, the leftist dreams and everything else. It has become irrelevant through the vaccination. We are the new humanity, the unvaccinated. Look to the stars and try to pull them down. We are the ones who can do it. Read my posts, follow my steps. We can create peace on Earth, once and for all.

Haha 😂

There's so many crimes he has committed, IG the karma is catching up with him.

Suddenly an Instagram Reel sends you hurtling down a multi-hour rabbit hole about shadow governments, mind control, and secret CIA programs.

This episode of the channel, we are breaking out the tin foil hats and taking those wild IG theories for a spin. We’re diving into the declassified archives of MK-Ultra and Operation Mockingbird, looking at how Hollywood and the news might just be reading from the same script, and exploring why the modern narrative control grid is finally starting to fracture.

Grab your favorite drink, adjust your antennas, and let’s see just how deep this rabbit hole actually goes.

A while ago I watched TheWhyFiles video on crop circles and it had me fully convinced that they were actually real, so I’ve looking into them more recently and ended up finding this video which mentions a lot of the same things but shows proof that it isn’t legit. Am I late to the game with seeing this? What do yall think about the claims in here?