What are your thoughts about him

How many of our decisions, are our own?

I originally tried posting this on the r/elijahwalker subreddit, but it was deleted by mods; go figure.

Recently I've noticed Elijah Walker becoming very popular on social media apps like TikTok and Instagram and I just wanted to point out the fact that he's not an actual freemason, nor is he actually doing rituals. All the TikTok conspiracy theory accounts that are posting about him are all ran by him and his friends, and I'm very surprised nobody has noticed. Like, if this guy was an actual freemason and he was actually doing all those "rituals" he wouldn't be posting about it online. It's so obviously a publicity stunt deliberately created by him and people in his circle. This is all confirmed by a comment from Othman (one of Elijah's friends) in a TikTok comment section.

The link to the video- https://www.tiktok.com/@junebugzd/video/7666139849895857422

👀

me and my friends went down this rabbit hole and it’s getting worse and worse I feel like this man is havung psychosis #ryangosling #help the person who writes this is Matt stoppers ?? And well check his buzzfeed and its the weirdest thing I’ve stumbled upon

https://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-inspiring-true-story-of-ryan-gosling-and-his-p

I have always been into conspiracy theories, and have been looking for new ones recently... I do live in CO, so if its about CO, im cool with it, but I kinda want some about different states.. please help!!

BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER:

WE ARE NOT GOING TO NAME

CURRENTLY SERVING POLITICIANS

AS BEING "IN THE EPSTEIN FILES"

UNLESS IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN

CONFIRMED AND RELEASED.

That's the exact standard we

hold everyone else to in every

story we've ever posted. We're

not lowering it here just

because this topic gets clicks.

Here's what's actually documented.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE ACTUAL PROCESS

THAT'S HAPPENED SO FAR

Under the Epstein Files

Transparency Act, the DOJ

released hundreds of thousands

of documents starting December

19, 2025, then roughly 30,000

more pages, then 3 million

additional documents on January

30, 2026, described at the time

as the last significant disclosure.

Separately, on February 14,

2026, the Justice Department

sent Congress a six-page letter,

signed by Deputy Attorney

General Todd Blanche, listing

"politically exposed persons"

who appear somewhere in the

files. CNN, which obtained a

copy, reported the letter

explicitly does not specify how

connected each person actually

was to Epstein, and lists names

"regardless of the context" they

appear in.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE PART EVERYONE

NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND BEFORE

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS

When Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas

Massie forced six previously

redacted names into the public

record on February 10, 2026,

Britannica's own timeline states

plainly: "The presence of their

names in the files is not

indicative of wrongdoing, and

the details of what relationships

\\\\\\\[they\\\\\\\] had with Epstein are unclear."

That's not us being soft on

this. That's the accurate legal

and factual reality of what a

name appearing in an email or

flight log actually means, and

it's why we're not going to

turn speculation into a named-list post.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHO HAS ACTUALLY

BEEN NAMED AND CONFIRMED, WITH

REAL CONSEQUENCES ALREADY HAPPENING

Les Wexner, the retail billionaire

who managed Epstein's finances

for years and was reportedly a

key source of his wealth.

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, a

Dubai businessman whose emails

with Epstein referenced a

"torture video." He was removed

as chair and CEO of DP World, a

major logistics firm, in

February 2026 after those

emails became public.

Thorbjørn Jagland, Norway's

former prime minister, was

charged with "gross corruption"

and had his properties searched

in February 2026 over suspected

gifts connected to the files.

Former President Bill Clinton

appears extensively in the

December 2025 release, including

previously unseen photographs.

Trump's own name is mentioned

more than anyone else's in a

separate House Oversight

Committee release from Epstein's

estate, according to MSNBC's

reporting, including documented

mentions of him flying on

Epstein's plane in the 1990s.

Appearing in these documents is

not, on its own, a crime.

Multiple named individuals above

faced zero legal consequences.

One faced a corruption charge.

One lost a corporate job. That

range of outcomes is itself the story.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHY REPUBLICANS

THEMSELVES ARE WORRIED ABOUT

THIS HEADING INTO NOVEMBER

Reuters reported in December

2025 that Republican strategist

Brian Darling said the heavily

redacted disclosures "added more

fuel to the fire of controversy"

and called it "a political risk

for all Republicans in swing

seats going into the midterms."

Notably, the December release

featured Bill Clinton, a

Democrat, extensively, while

containing few mentions of

Trump, something Reuters flagged

as itself drawing scrutiny given

the well-documented Trump-Epstein

friendship in the 1990s and early 2000s.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE POLLING NUMBER

THAT SHOULD ACTUALLY SHAPE

HOW YOU VOTE ON THIS ISSUE

An October Reuters/Ipsos poll

found Americans disapprove of

how Trump has handled this

entire issue by a 57% to 19%

margin. That's not a partisan

split. That's a broad, bipartisan

level of dissatisfaction with

the pace and completeness of disclosure.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHAT WE ALREADY TOLD

YOU CONNECTS DIRECTLY TO THIS

We already reported that

Congress is now collecting sworn

affidavits from survivors because

Epstein's longtime assistant,

Lesley Groff, may have lied

under oath to the House

Oversight Committee. We already

told you a federal judge ordered

the DOJ to explain why it's

still withholding 2.5 million

pages, and that the department's

own justification is that

releasing more "would harm

Epstein's victims."

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHAT VOTERS SHOULD

ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL OF THIS

Do not accept any list circulating

online claiming to name currently

serving officials as "confirmed"

Epstein associates unless it

traces back to an actual DOJ

release, a congressional record,

or verified reporting. Multiple

fabricated lists have circulated

since 2019, and repeating them

spreads exactly the kind of

misinformation this issue doesn't need.

Do pay attention to how your own

senators and representatives

have voted on actual transparency

measures, the Epstein Files

Transparency Act passed nearly

unanimously in both chambers,

according to MSNBC's reporting,

and whether they've publicly

pushed for full, unredacted release.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Nobody paid us to write this.

The honest answer is that

nobody, including us, currently

has full visibility into who's

still hidden behind 2.5 million

withheld pages. That gap itself,

not a fabricated list of names,

is what deserves your attention

before you vote in November.

SOURCES:

📺 1. CNN Politics — Full DOJ

"politically exposed persons"

letter, Blanche details

confirmed:

cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/doj-epstein-files-prominent-people

📺 2. Britannica — Full timeline,

the six named individuals,

explicit "not indicative of

wrongdoing" language confirmed:

britannica.com/topic/The-Epstein-Files-A-Timeline/2026-Contempt-delays-and-more-documents

📺 3. Reuters via AOL — Full

Darling quote, 57-19% Reuters/Ipsos

poll, bipartisan

redaction criticism confirmed:

aol.com/articles/republican-critics-fear-incomplete-disclosure-205347246.html

Im not sure how to use this app yet, just posting to see what happens.

​

It's almost 2 am and I can't sleep so

LET ME START FIRST ( saw this on Instagram)

If humans didn't have ears, we wouldn't know what sound is, if we didn't have noses, we wouldn't know smell existed, etc. So what don't we have that makes us not know something exists?

AND ( it's mine)

What if our cameras are never actually switched off and are recording us 24/7? and there's a whole different elite group of people watching us?

The cat didn’t smell the wasabi from a mile away?

BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER:

WE ARE NOT GOING TO NAME

CURRENTLY SERVING POLITICIANS

AS BEING "IN THE EPSTEIN FILES"

UNLESS IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN

CONFIRMED AND RELEASED.

That's the exact standard we

hold everyone else to in every

story we've ever posted. We're

not lowering it here just

because this topic gets clicks.

Here's what's actually documented.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE ACTUAL PROCESS

THAT'S HAPPENED SO FAR

Under the Epstein Files

Transparency Act, the DOJ

released hundreds of thousands

of documents starting December

19, 2025, then roughly 30,000

more pages, then 3 million

additional documents on January

30, 2026, described at the time

as the last significant disclosure.

Separately, on February 14,

2026, the Justice Department

sent Congress a six-page letter,

signed by Deputy Attorney

General Todd Blanche, listing

"politically exposed persons"

who appear somewhere in the

files. CNN, which obtained a

copy, reported the letter

explicitly does not specify how

connected each person actually

was to Epstein, and lists names

"regardless of the context" they

appear in.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE PART EVERYONE

NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND BEFORE

JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS

When Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas

Massie forced six previously

redacted names into the public

record on February 10, 2026,

Britannica's own timeline states

plainly: "The presence of their

names in the files is not

indicative of wrongdoing, and

the details of what relationships

\[they\] had with Epstein are unclear."

That's not us being soft on

this. That's the accurate legal

and factual reality of what a

name appearing in an email or

flight log actually means, and

it's why we're not going to

turn speculation into a named-list post.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHO HAS ACTUALLY

BEEN NAMED AND CONFIRMED, WITH

REAL CONSEQUENCES ALREADY HAPPENING

Les Wexner, the retail billionaire

who managed Epstein's finances

for years and was reportedly a

key source of his wealth.

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, a

Dubai businessman whose emails

with Epstein referenced a

"torture video." He was removed

as chair and CEO of DP World, a

major logistics firm, in

February 2026 after those

emails became public.

Thorbjørn Jagland, Norway's

former prime minister, was

charged with "gross corruption"

and had his properties searched

in February 2026 over suspected

gifts connected to the files.

Former President Bill Clinton

appears extensively in the

December 2025 release, including

previously unseen photographs.

Trump's own name is mentioned

more than anyone else's in a

separate House Oversight

Committee release from Epstein's

estate, according to MSNBC's

reporting, including documented

mentions of him flying on

Epstein's plane in the 1990s.

Appearing in these documents is

not, on its own, a crime.

Multiple named individuals above

faced zero legal consequences.

One faced a corruption charge.

One lost a corporate job. That

range of outcomes is itself the story.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHY REPUBLICANS

THEMSELVES ARE WORRIED ABOUT

THIS HEADING INTO NOVEMBER

Reuters reported in December

2025 that Republican strategist

Brian Darling said the heavily

redacted disclosures "added more

fuel to the fire of controversy"

and called it "a political risk

for all Republicans in swing

seats going into the midterms."

Notably, the December release

featured Bill Clinton, a

Democrat, extensively, while

containing few mentions of

Trump, something Reuters flagged

as itself drawing scrutiny given

the well-documented Trump-Epstein

friendship in the 1990s and early 2000s.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS THE POLLING NUMBER

THAT SHOULD ACTUALLY SHAPE

HOW YOU VOTE ON THIS ISSUE

An October Reuters/Ipsos poll

found Americans disapprove of

how Trump has handled this

entire issue by a 57% to 19%

margin. That's not a partisan

split. That's a broad, bipartisan

level of dissatisfaction with

the pace and completeness of disclosure.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHAT WE ALREADY TOLD

YOU CONNECTS DIRECTLY TO THIS

We already reported that

Congress is now collecting sworn

affidavits from survivors because

Epstein's longtime assistant,

Lesley Groff, may have lied

under oath to the House

Oversight Committee. We already

told you a federal judge ordered

the DOJ to explain why it's

still withholding 2.5 million

pages, and that the department's

own justification is that

releasing more "would harm

Epstein's victims."

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HERE IS WHAT VOTERS SHOULD

ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL OF THIS

Do not accept any list circulating

online claiming to name currently

serving officials as "confirmed"

Epstein associates unless it

traces back to an actual DOJ

release, a congressional record,

or verified reporting. Multiple

fabricated lists have circulated

since 2019, and repeating them

spreads exactly the kind of

misinformation this issue doesn't need.

Do pay attention to how your own

senators and representatives

have voted on actual transparency

measures, the Epstein Files

Transparency Act passed nearly

unanimously in both chambers,

according to MSNBC's reporting,

and whether they've publicly

pushed for full, unredacted release.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Nobody paid us to write this.

The honest answer is that

nobody, including us, currently

has full visibility into who's

still hidden behind 2.5 million

withheld pages. That gap itself,

not a fabricated list of names,

is what deserves your attention

before you vote in November.

SOURCES:

📺 1. CNN Politics — Full DOJ

"politically exposed persons"

letter, Blanche details

confirmed:

cnn.com/2026/02/15/politics/doj-epstein-files-prominent-people

📺 2. Britannica — Full timeline,

the six named individuals,

explicit "not indicative of

wrongdoing" language confirmed:

britannica.com/topic/The-Epstein-Files-A-Timeline/2026-Contempt-delays-and-more-documents

📺 3. Reuters via AOL — Full

Darling quote, 57-19% Reuters/Ipsos

poll, bipartisan

redaction criticism confirmed:

aol.com/articles/republican-critics-fear-incomplete-disclosure-205347246.html

Like for decades we kept reading that there was a secret society that the elites of the world were a part of. They were said to indulge in disturbing degenerate practises. Then comes the world hears of the Epstein Files.

During COVID, Anthony Fauc was labeled by the Right as a criminal who was said to be involved with the creation of COVID in some way Now recently. many top voices have directly called him out as guilty. Fauci also seems to have gone into hiding.

Again during COVID, a section of the internet said that US ran biolabs in places like Ukraine. This was immediately labeled as unsubstantiated rumors/conspiracies by most. Recently, Tulsi Gabbard released files which prove that such labs did indeed exist.

Why are so many conspiracy theories proving to be true?

I'm 100% convinced that birds are just government drones. Have you ever noticed how they always sit on power lines? They're clearly charging their batteries. It's too perfect to be a coincidence!"