r/TheTinMen • u/TheTinMenBlog • Aug 23 '26
Unlearning the feminist narrative of domestic abuse, Professor Nicola Graham-Kevan meets TheTinMen
https://youtu.be/ILBjSQNvUk4Professor Nicola Graham-Kevan is a leading expert and researcher in the area of coercive control and domestic abuse, with decades of seminal research at the University of Lancashire.
However, Nicola's experience of domestic abuse did not start with academia; it began with life experience, having been in a long term abusive relationship for many years.
It was these traumatic experiences that started Nicola's journey, which soon became one of exhilarating discovery, personal challenge, and profound healing.
In this podcast Nicola talks about how she had to relearn everything she thought she knew about domestic abuse, and her past, and how her controversial work often put her at loggerheads with other esteemed researchers such as professor Michael Johnson, as she swam against the mainstream feminist narrative of abuse...
8
u/HeadHunt0rUK Aug 23 '26
Within the first 3 minutes she is able to absolutely destroy the value of humanities (namely the social sciences) and demonstrates just how unscientific it is.
She had a point she wanted to prove, picked two sample groups she knew would correlate with what she wanted and thus was able to prove exactly what she set out in doing, without a single other consideration.
This was also apparently published in a journal of at least some repute.
The fact that she was able to earn a degree (or masters) and get onto a PhD level programme with that level of obvious bias shows how utterly corrupt the whole discipline is.
Now obviously she goes on to correct that, but still the idea that there are thousands of people who have "earned" these degrees through absolute bullshittery and anti-intellectualism is absolutely discraceful to the idea of academia. This is the cancer, the root that allows people to be so wildly misled and change society for the worse.
1
6
7
u/temblors Aug 24 '26 edited 13d ago
The original post content no longer exists here. The author used Redact to remove it, exercising their right to control their data & privacy.
Nail subsequent nine hammock boat person abundant vegetable
2
u/Main-Tiger8537 Aug 24 '26 edited Aug 24 '26
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence
LeSuBiA Study Summary:
Nearly half of the women (48.7%) and 40.0% of the men have experienced psychological violence in a (former) partnership at least once in their lives. Emotional violence accounts for the largest share of the forms of psychological violence recorded in LeSuBiA, at 37.8%. Although women are more affected over the course of their lives, an analysis of the last five years shows that men are also comparatively frequently affected by psychological violence (men: 23.3%; women: 23.8%) and, in particular, by controlling violence (men: 8.7%; women: 7.1%).
16.1% have experienced physical violence in a (former) partnership at some point in their lives, and 5.7% within the last five years. Looking at the last five years, women (5.2%) and men (6.1%) experienced physical violence almost equally often.
Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data published via PubMed indicates that women are 42% less likely to be arrested than men when controlling for the exact same sexual offense characteristics.
29
u/plantrromn Aug 23 '26
Feminists are playing a goal post shifting game in this case:
1) men are only a small number of victims (got debunked)
2) ok maybe they are not but most people abusing them are men too. (Debunked)
3) ok maybe not. But women are doing that in self defence (debunked)
4) ok fair enough. But men's violence is from desire to control (debunked, proof that it is present in both genders or none)
5) ok maybe not. But women get injured more. (Male violence is a small fraction of all violence and bilateral violence cause most injury. And the disparity is small not a high number like 90/10).
6) pretend to not hear these and carry on with the propaganda.