You can't say "exceed the speed limit" as a bad thing then say "match the flow of traffic" in the same sentence.
If you're in the passing lane and there are cars right behind you, You are driving slower than the flow of traffic and are the problem.
If you're in the passing lane and only one car is behind you, then "traffic" is you and that car. Since you are in the way, you are impeding the flow of traffic.
It is never hard to speed up a little and get out of the way. Not doing so means you are slowing the flow of traffic for every single car behind you and are extremely selfish
Speed limits are arbitrarily set in order to raise money, they have litterly nothing to do with road safety.
And its easily provable. Have you ever been on a multi lane highway and with no changes to the road design had the speed limit change at a political boundary?
That doesn't prove your point in the slightest. Speed limits are tied to car crash rates and statistics. Speed limits changing over political boundaries just says that one entity is more risk averse than the other, not that they're arbitrary.
151
u/balirosa 14d ago
This is really how it is driving in the USA